Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Bitopex Maniacs

Channel

Bitopex Maniacs

@bitopexmaniacs

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,915subscribers

-374 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002138131320
TypeChannel
Username@bitopexmaniacs
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/bitopexmaniacs

Growth

7,9158,2898,1026 August 2026 — 8,289 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,288 subscribers9 August 2026 — 8,250 subscribers12 August 2026 — 8,213 subscribers15 August 2026 — 8,183 subscribers18 August 2026 — 8,143 subscribers21 August 2026 — 8,116 subscribers25 August 2026 — 8,064 subscribers28 August 2026 — 8,038 subscribers31 August 2026 — 8,004 subscribers3 September 2026 — 7,973 subscribers8 September 2026 — 7,915 subscribers6 August 20268 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 33 days, net -374. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,859–8,345 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Sept 2026, 14:587,915-58
3 Sept 2026, 00:247,973-31
31 Aug 2026, 07:538,004-34
28 Aug 2026, 14:488,038-26
25 Aug 2026, 04:078,064-52
21 Aug 2026, 15:368,116-27
18 Aug 2026, 23:258,143-40
15 Aug 2026, 18:228,183-30
12 Aug 2026, 13:178,213-37
9 Aug 2026, 22:128,250-38
6 Aug 2026, 21:308,288-1
6 Aug 2026, 19:178,289first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 5 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.28%
avg views ÷ 7,915 subscribers
Avg views / post
101
1 post measured
Reaction rate
1.98%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 August 2026
Posts held20 (5 April 202621 August 2026)
Views total101
Reactions total2
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 19:09 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

60 reactions across 16 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥3558.3%
👍1525.0%
46.67%
👌23.33%
👏23.33%
🤝23.33%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 60 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 April 2026 to 21 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

21 Aug 2026, 05:36 UTC101 views2 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @bitOpexchannel

Crypto pumped this week and almost nobody was positioned for it. $3.3B in positions were liquidated in a matter of hours, and 91% of them were shorts. The Fear and Greed Index was sitting under 25, deep in extreme fear, days before the move. In the new video, Evinho goes through what actually caused it: - The US Treasury doubling its long-end bond buybacks from Sept 9 - 20 to 30 year yields at a 19 year high - The

🔥2

6 Aug 2026, 05:18 UTC195 views2 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @bitOpexchannel

New video is up. July closed at 2.1% on the Bitcoin vault and 3.4% on the altcoin one. Best month since April, and the market gave up almost nothing this month. Also in there: why Bitcoin is stuck in the same range it has been in since June, why Solana's volume is basically gone, and the two calls I sold this week (ETH 2k, SOL 78). Last week @evinho0x said HYPE was going under 55. It went to 50. https://x.com/Bit

👍2

2 Aug 2026, 10:34 UTC268 views3 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Community Update Hello everyone, This weekend, we consciously did not open any positions – in hindsight, this was the right decision. The market continued the expected downward trend, although it was pushed upwards by news surrounding Trump. Such short-term, news-driven movements are hardly reliably predictable and do not belong to our trading approach. In the past two weeks, we executed significantly fewer trades

🔥2👍1

19 Jul 2026, 08:37 UTC340 views5 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Hello Community, The weekend went significantly better again. I missed the entry a bit and therefore built the position more conservatively; nevertheless, the trade went well. I closed the BTC position early to reduce risk. In recent weeks, we have often seen that the market has risen from Friday to Sunday. Therefore, I consciously skipped our call sales this weekend. At the same time, the option premiums have beco

2🔥2👍1

18 Jul 2026, 07:08 UTC176 views3 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @bitOpexchannelPhoto

Copytrading results, tracked in real time 📊 🔶0DTE Bitcoin $BTC Strategy +58.44% ROI/year +125.05% total P&L 🔷ALT-0DTE Strategy +29.99% ROI/year +21.28% total P&L ▶️Review the data, compare the strategies, and decide what fits your approach. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

🔥3

12 Jul 2026, 10:29 UTC294 views5 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Update from the Bitopex CEO Hello Community, The trades over the weekend started off positively. However, a large portion of the gains was unfortunately lost again after the conflict with Iran flared up once more, and the markets reacted accordingly. This is, of course, frustrating, as we would have had a significantly stronger month without this event. Nevertheless, we still stand solid overall and are operating

🔥3👌2

6 Jul 2026, 08:54 UTC263 viewsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @bitOpexchannelPhoto

Green week across the board 👇 • BTC: +5.6% • ETH: +9.8% • SOL: +7.1% • XRP: +7.4% • PAXG: +2.7% Outlook for this week: Markets enter the new week with buyers back in control, but resistance is now close. Expected volatility: • BTC: ~4.5% expected move • ETH: ~6.0% • SOL: ~8.0% Right now, $BTC holding above 61.8k and reclaiming 64k is the main signal for broader continuation. A possible strategy idea is a weekly Bul

26 Jun 2026, 11:00 UTC259 views4 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @bitOpexchannelPhoto

I was right on direction and still lost money? That usually sounds impossible, until you meet IV crush. You buy a call before a big market move. Price goes up. Your option should win, right? Not always. Options are priced on more than direction. They also price expected movement. If traders expect chaos, implied volatility rises. That makes options more expensive. After the event passes, that fear can disappear fa

🔥4

21 Jun 2026, 15:04 UTC≈3,320 views8 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

CEO Update on Trading The week went well; we are out of the drawdown. The last trade went exactly as expected; I even wanted to sell puts more aggressively and would have been right, but since there was hardly any premium on the higher strikes, I opted for the calmer option. I closed the trades earlier because we had 2-3 trades this month where our profit evaporated 1-2 hours before expiration. When we are already

👍3🔥3🤝2

14 Jun 2026, 20:38 UTC255 viewsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @bitOpexchannel

SpaceX IPO is the headline, but the real setup is liquidity. - $75B raise - Almost 4x oversubscribed retail demand - 95x valuation mentioned in the transcript - Elon becomes the first trillionaire ever - Anthropic and OpenAI are next in the IPO race If retail money gets locked into SpaceX, the next AI IPOs may have a very different market waiting for them. https://x.com/BitopexIO/status/2066154428952887417

29 May 2026, 18:57 UTC317 views3 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @bitOpexchannelPhoto

🎯 Ever wonder why BTC suddenly moves into a certain price on Friday expiration? It might be… Max Pain! ▶️Max Pain is the price at which the largest number of options expire worthless. Why does it matter? Because market makers often benefit most when the price expires near that level: • Option buyers lose premium • Sellers keep the decay • Volatility compresses into expiry That’s why you sometimes see BTC stuck to

1👍1🔥1

25 May 2026, 09:11 UTC300 views2 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @bitOpexchannelPhoto

📅 Most Important Macro Events This Week Three key U.S. reports could drive volatility across crypto markets 👇 Consumer Confidence (Tue 15:00 CET) • Strong confidence + stable inflation expectations → bullish • Weak confidence or rising inflation fears → bearish US GDP Q1 (Thu 13:30 CET) • Stable or stronger growth → risk-on • Weak revision or stagflation fears → risk-off PCE Inflation / Core PCE (Thu 13:30 CET) •

🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @bitopexmaniacs. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Warrior Coin Announcements
@WarriorCoin_Ann · 329,514
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 26 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Bitopex Maniacs” (@bitopexmaniacs), 7,915 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bitopexmaniacs.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.