Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for GLUSHILKI

Channel

GLUSHILKI

@blocksignal

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

39,567subscribers

+564 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001475829159
TypeChannel
Username@blocksignal
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 October 2026
Measurements held41
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/blocksignal

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 59% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

38,99439,56739,280.55 August 2026 — 39,003 subscribers6 August 2026 — 39,003 subscribers6 August 2026 — 38,998 subscribers7 August 2026 — 38,994 subscribers8 August 2026 — 39,014 subscribers9 August 2026 — 39,021 subscribers10 August 2026 — 39,035 subscribers11 August 2026 — 39,081 subscribers12 August 2026 — 39,094 subscribers13 August 2026 — 39,088 subscribers15 August 2026 — 39,083 subscribers16 August 2026 — 39,079 subscribers17 August 2026 — 39,071 subscribers19 August 2026 — 39,081 subscribers20 August 2026 — 39,082 subscribers21 August 2026 — 39,081 subscribers23 August 2026 — 39,088 subscribers24 August 2026 — 39,093 subscribers25 August 2026 — 39,123 subscribers27 August 2026 — 39,126 subscribers28 August 2026 — 39,144 subscribers29 August 2026 — 39,131 subscribers30 August 2026 — 39,117 subscribers1 September 2026 — 39,130 subscribers2 September 2026 — 39,134 subscribers3 September 2026 — 39,133 subscribers5 September 2026 — 39,145 subscribers8 September 2026 — 39,152 subscribers11 September 2026 — 39,156 subscribers13 September 2026 — 39,173 subscribers14 September 2026 — 39,196 subscribers16 September 2026 — 39,206 subscribers19 September 2026 — 39,220 subscribers25 September 2026 — 39,217 subscribers4 October 2026 — 39,299 subscribers8 October 2026 — 39,337 subscribers13 October 2026 — 39,504 subscribers14 October 2026 — 39,527 subscribers15 October 2026 — 39,542 subscribers16 October 2026 — 39,554 subscribers17 October 2026 — 39,567 subscribers5 August 202617 October 2026
41 measurements spanning 73 days, net +564. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 38,908–39,653 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 41
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Oct 2026, 10:3739,567+13
16 Oct 2026, 10:5639,554+12
15 Oct 2026, 11:2939,542+15
14 Oct 2026, 12:5839,527+23
13 Oct 2026, 02:1139,504+167
8 Oct 2026, 17:3739,337+38
4 Oct 2026, 09:4139,299+82
25 Sept 2026, 23:0239,217-3
19 Sept 2026, 07:5639,220+14
16 Sept 2026, 20:3639,206+10
14 Sept 2026, 20:0139,196+23
13 Sept 2026, 09:5939,173+17
11 Sept 2026, 13:3639,156+4
8 Sept 2026, 18:1639,152+7
5 Sept 2026, 09:0039,145+12
3 Sept 2026, 09:1639,133-1
2 Sept 2026, 03:5539,134+4
1 Sept 2026, 01:4439,130+13
30 Aug 2026, 22:2439,117-14
29 Aug 2026, 19:1739,131first reading

Engagement

484 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 133 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
18.2%
avg views ÷ 39,567 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,210
170 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.17%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
171
of 484 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 October 2026
Posts held484 (4 August 2026 – 16 October 2026)
Views total1,225,380
Reactions total26,646
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken17 Oct 2026, 04:57 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1h 37m
Average length
30s

Measured directly from 194 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

76,910 reactions across 470 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣51,71067.2%
👍7,70010.0%
❤‍🔥5,0826.61%
🫡4,5925.97%
🌚1,6782.18%
🗿1,3521.76%
🤝1,3291.73%
⚡1,2061.57%
🤬1,0971.43%
😈7590.987%
🙏4050.527%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 483 of the 484 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 78,922 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 484 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 16 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
501
across the posts below
Posts paid on
73
of 483 we hold a reading for · 15%
Most on one post
108
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @blocksignal. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 484 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 16 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

16 Oct 2026, 13:53 UTC≈3,540 views179 reactions1 Starread 17 October 2026
Photo

Когда рассказал новой знакомой в баре про все свои схемы и темки, а она на вопрос будет ли еще коктейль ответила «никак нет» GLUSHILKI

🤣141🫡27🌚9❤‍🔥1😈1

16 Oct 2026, 12:25 UTC≈3,830 views75 reactions1 Starread 17 October 2026
Video

Завеса - это вам не терминатор и скорпион, но и не Пелена. GLUSHILKI

🤣58❤‍🔥8🫡6😈2⚡1

16 Oct 2026, 11:08 UTC≈4,500 views121 reactionsread 17 October 2026
Photo

Вопреки здравому смыслу.. GLUSHILKI

🤣109❤‍🔥5🤝4🫡3

16 Oct 2026, 09:19 UTC≈4,730 views157 reactionsread 17 October 2026
Photo

Ведь на кладбище оптимист видит одни плюсы GLUSHILKI

🤣146❤‍🔥11

16 Oct 2026, 06:35 UTC≈5,030 views143 reactionsread 17 October 2026
Photo

Норм план GLUSHILKI

🤣79👍48🌚10🗿4😈2

15 Oct 2026, 15:18 UTC≈6,920 views246 reactionsread 17 October 2026
Photo

Неважно на какой машине ты подъехал к своему офису, Феррари или Ламборгини, если рядом припаркован форт транзит следственного комитета) GLUSHILKI

🤣200❤‍🔥25⚡13👍5🗿3

15 Oct 2026, 13:45 UTC≈6,020 views128 reactionsread 17 October 2026
Photo

🚗 💨 GLUSHILKI

🤣115❤‍🔥6🤬4😈3

15 Oct 2026, 09:40 UTC≈6,240 views292 reactions1 Starread 17 October 2026
Video

Колоритно GLUSHILKI

👍173❤‍🔥82🫡30🙏5⚡1🤬1

15 Oct 2026, 07:58 UTC≈6,120 views121 reactionsread 17 October 2026
Photo

Так было https://t.me/vadresah/7220 GLUSHILKI

🤣104🌚8❤‍🔥6⚡3

15 Oct 2026, 06:55 UTC≈6,140 views130 reactions1 Starread 17 October 2026
Photo

Важно помнить о последствиях GLUSHILKI

🌚57🤣50👍20❤‍🔥1🫡1😈1

15 Oct 2026, 06:52 UTC≈6,810 views83 reactionsread 17 October 2026
Video

🟥Опасность сдачи квартир посуточно У вас арендуют квартиру, там ставят симбоксы, мошенники довольны, вызовы крутятся, лавешка мутится, дальше приходят дяди в масках и спрашивают у вас, ты че, рамсы попутал? Шучу, другое говорят Мораль сей басни такова, внимательнее к тем, кому сдаете квартиру GLUSHILKI

👍58🫡24🗿1

15 Oct 2026, 04:59 UTC≈6,440 views128 reactionsread 17 October 2026
Video

Где-то в Казахстане GLUSHILKI

🤣113❤‍🔥7🫡4😈4

Showing the 12 most recent of 484 posts we hold for @blocksignal. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

24 Sept 2026, 18:46 UTCAnonymous Poll1,150 voters approx.

В какую страну вы поехали бы, если бы не нужен был загранпаспорт и виза😁

  1. Финляндия70%
  2. Эстония4%
  3. Литва3%
  4. Латвия3%
  5. Польша19%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

29 Aug 2026, 12:01 UTCAnonymous Poll1,860 voters approx.

Как вы относитесь к применению тактического ядерного удара по противнику?

  1. Положительно65%
  2. Отрицательно37%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 484 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 16 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

В адресах
@vadresah · 28,937
7 posts
Ночные мемы
@night_memes · 11
5 posts
Интернет-Розыск
@irozysk · 45,821
4 posts
Чужие мемы
@alien_mems · 114
3 posts
ФСБач
@fsbach · 16,001
2 posts
Михаил Мухлынин 🇷🇺
@muhlynin_m · 1,170
2 posts
СМЕРШ 64
@smersh64 · 55
2 posts
ЦИОД
@CIOD_ru · 1,577
1 post
🇷🇺Культура против террора (КППИТ 24-28гг)
@CultureVSterror · 743
1 post
УЦТМ Казань
@KazanTacticalMedicine · 99
1 post
Татьяна Маругова ✍🏻
@MarugovaSlovo · 15,405
1 post
А.В. Корякин | Развернутая эпитафия
@Public_epitaph · 97
1 post
Дневник Волка с Groove Street
@TheWolfofGrooveStreet · 30
1 post
ОТРЯДЫ ВЕТЕРАНОВ
@VeteranGroupRussia · 91
1 post
Какой-то Андерсон
@andreson4hhhh · 968
1 post
КриптоИванов
@cryptoivanoff · 860
1 post
Цифровая эстетика (aka цифровой "колхоз")
@digitaltalent · 798
1 post
Фёдор Филатов
@feodorfilatov · 1,742
1 post
Glockmeister
@glockmeister_lj · 6,634
1 post
Личная Безопасность
@ikken_hisatsu · 6,425
1 post
Оперативный обзор
@operobzor · 96,390
1 post
Юрий Евич | "Юрич"
@russkiysoldatYurich · 35,376
1 post
STT GROUP
@stt_group · 388
1 post
Телега проще, чем кажется
@telega_proshe · 73
1 post
РосСнарягКонтроль (тот самый DOOMER_SQUAD)
@the_doomer_squad · 2,768
1 post
Большие решения
@top_novostii · 2,403
1 post
Беспилотники (дроны, БПЛА, UAV)
@uav_tech · 18,094
1 post
Подпольный клуб
@undergal · 8,272
1 post
🔥Писарь из Штаба🧨
@war24022022 · 7,079
1 post

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 32 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 23 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“GLUSHILKI” (@blocksignal), 39,567 subscribers as measured 17 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/blocksignal.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.