Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Бук Таміла

Channel

Бук Таміла

@booktamila

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

178subscribers

-6 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001795892940
TypeChannel
Username@booktamila
CreatedBetween 1 January 2022 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/booktamila

Growth

1781841818 August 2026 — 184 subscribers8 August 2026 — 184 subscribers23 August 2026 — 182 subscribers29 August 2026 — 181 subscribers7 September 2026 — 179 subscribers15 September 2026 — 178 subscribers8 August 202615 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 38 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 177–185 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 03:37178-1
7 Sept 2026, 04:22179-2
29 Aug 2026, 13:08181-1
23 Aug 2026, 11:26182-2
8 Aug 2026, 12:30184no change
8 Aug 2026, 05:32184first reading

Engagement

7 posts held, back to 20 December 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 June 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

34 reactions across 7 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 88.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3088.2%
👍411.8%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 34 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 20 December 2024 to 1 June 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Jun 2025, 13:36 UTC698 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

З усього скандалу щодо Софі Ларк ця новина для мене найдивніша. Взагалі дивно що раніше ніхто його не помітив 🙆‍♀️🧐. Саму книгу «Brutal Prince» (з якої й почався скандал) я читала ще декілька років тому й можу сміло сказати, що у порівнянні зі схожими авторами цього жанру вона ну дуже слабка та безглуздо написана.

👍4

1 Jun 2025, 13:33 UTC687 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @readsawturnPhoto

Мені тут в коментарях сказали, що у Софі Ларк є книжка про українку. І я пішла досліджувати це питання. І так, вона є. Вона вийшла у 2024 році. Це щось типу «дарк роману», де в нас ЕЛЕНА ЗЕЛЕНСЬКА (тобто, авторка 100% знала про що пише, якщо чесно, це виглядає дуже дивно), яка настільки хоче покинути Україну, що летить в Америку, щоб одружитися з чоловіком, якого не бачила (чи бачила 1 раз, я так і не зрозуміла) До

2

2 Jan 2025, 16:42 UTC749 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Перша книга року - Король Неверленду (#1) - 4/10 Перша книга серії темного ретелінга історіі Пітера Пена. На жаль попри цікаву ідею, авторка вирішила написати всього лише 200 сторінок і очевидно багато з цього не вийшло. У книзі троп «why choose » тому стосовно любовної лінії поки що не зрозуміло🤷‍♀️ Загалом ця серія була доволі популярною, тому я дуже хотіла ознайомитись, але після першої частини навіть не знаю чи ч

8

2 Jan 2025, 13:52 UTC515 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Прочитане за 2024 : 64 книги (усі на фото) Результат майже вдвічі менший ніж за попередні роки але що є😔🙌🏻 Мій goodreads де відмічаю усі книги протягом читання та відгуки : тут У кого яка улюблена книга за попередній рік? 👇

7

31 Dec 2024, 09:59 UTC385 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Одна з моїх улюблених книг минулого року 🎉🎉🎉☝🏻☝🏻

2

31 Dec 2024, 09:59 UTC385 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @vivat_publishingPhoto

«Неонові боги» будуть українською ⚡️ Передзамовлення на першу частину серії вже у січні 💚 Гарячий переспів відомого міфу про Персефону і Аїда Це перша книжка серії Dark Olympus із 8 романів, кожен з яких в еротичній та вишуканій манері переосмислює відомий грецький міф на сучасний лад. «Надзвичайно винахідливо… Цей роман гарячий, мов лава», — так пишуть про «Неонових богів» у Publishers Weekly. 😎 Мерч треба? А по

4

20 Dec 2024, 16:02 UTC427 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

КСД не перестає тішити🔥 Анонси новинок на січень можна глянути на їх сторінці Для себе напевно буду брати ці три книги😏

7

Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @booktamila. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Бук Таміла” (@booktamila), 178 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/booktamila.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.