В ток-шоу "Еще не вечер" обсудили зумеров и их первую работу — и то, как к ним относится коллектив. 🔥🔥🔥Боровик дал несколько очень полезных советов молодым специалистам.
💯3❤2👍2💋1
Signed ️

Channel
@borovikofficial
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
21,539subscribers
+1,441 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002228577468 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @borovikofficial |
| Description | Официальный телеграм канал |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 60 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/borovikofficial |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Nov 2026, 15:55 | 21,539 | -49 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 13:28 | 21,588 | -23 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 12:29 | 21,611 | -142 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 11:35 | 21,753 | -497 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 10:19 | 22,250 | -81 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 12:27 | 22,331 | +716 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 11:06 | 21,615 | -59 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 13:00 | 21,674 | -33 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 12:35 | 21,707 | -79 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 11:14 | 21,786 | -50 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 11:38 | 21,836 | -74 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 08:41 | 21,910 | -26 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 12:00 | 21,936 | -21 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 13:27 | 21,957 | -7 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 13:46 | 21,964 | -64 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 10:56 | 22,028 | -29 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 12:16 | 22,057 | -16 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 04:59 | 22,073 | -9 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 00:44 | 22,082 | -22 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 21:26 | 22,104 | first reading |
80 posts held, back to 17 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 78 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 80 (17 June 2026 – 7 November 2026) |
| Views total | 32,340 |
| Reactions total | 232 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Nov 2026, 15:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 50 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,024 reactions across 80 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 285 | 27.8% | |
| 🔥 | 183 | 17.9% | |
| 💯 | 148 | 14.5% | |
| 👏 | 143 | 14.0% | |
| 💋 | 69 | 6.74% | |
| 👍 | 68 | 6.64% | |
| 🥰 | 65 | 6.35% | |
| ❤🔥 | 35 | 3.42% | |
| 🏆 | 13 | 1.27% | |
| 🤝 | 8 | 0.781% | |
| 🙏 | 4 | 0.391% | |
| 💘 | 2 | 0.195% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 0.098% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 80 of the 80 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,024 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 80 most recent posts we hold, published 17 June 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 20 posts held from the last 30 days (5.00%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
В ток-шоу "Еще не вечер" обсудили зумеров и их первую работу — и то, как к ним относится коллектив. 🔥🔥🔥Боровик дал несколько очень полезных советов молодым специалистам.
💯3❤2👍2💋1
Signed ️
⚡️ЗАЧЕМ ЕВРОПУ ВТЯГИВАЮТ В КОНФЛИКТ? 📌Останьтесь "Наедине с Боровиком" по субботам в 12:00 на СБТВ. 🇧🇾Читайте нас в MAX | VK | Telegram
👏5💋2👍1🥰1
Signed ️
🤖Как ИИ манипулирует людьми? ВСЯ ПРАВДА О ЧАТ-БОТАХ 📌Останьтесь "Наедине с Боровиком" по субботам в 12:00 на СБТВ. 🇧🇾Читайте нас в MAX | VK | Telegram
👍3🥰3❤1💯1🔥1
Signed ️
Боровик: выступление Лукашенко на Минской конференции обозначило ориентиры новой архитектуры безопасности 🇧🇾Делегат Всебелорусского народного собрания, депутат Мингорсовета Вадим Боровик прокомментировал ключевые тезисы Президента Александра Лукашенко на IV Минской международной конференции по евразийской безопасности. По оценке Боровика, выступление главы государства сформировало практическую повестку — от институц…
💯4❤3👏2🏆1🙏1
Signed ️
🇧🇾Вадим Боровик о технологическом отставании, ИИ и глобальной конкуренции 🔻❗️Делегат Всебелорусского народного собрания, депутат Вадим Боровик встретился с участниками международного форума «Мой город – мое будущее». Центральными темами разговора стали влияние технологий на городскую среду, развитие искусственного интеллекта, преодоление технологического отставания и роль государства в условиях глобальной конкуренц…
🔥5🥰2👏1💋1
Signed ️
Президент Республики Беларусь Александр Лукашенко выступает на Минской международной конференции по евразийской безопасности. 📣 Лукашенко: «Знаем, что за ходом нашей Конференции следят на Западе и многие хотели бы на ней побывать. Но им мешает страх оторваться от западного мейнстрима. 💬 Скажу сразу: мы не проводим разделительных линий и не навешиваем ярлыки, а честно и открыто говорим о нашем восприятии проблем». В…
❤7👏3🔥2💯1
Signed ️
🔥🎵Мая новая песня на роднай мове "Чараўніца".
👍5👏4💋3❤2🔥1🥰1
Signed ️
🆕Путин-Трамп-Зеленский: встреча будет? Егор Крид, ИДИ И СМОТРИ! Кто качает Европу? 🔥В новом выпуске проекта «Наедине с Боровиком» острый политический анализ главных событий недели! Сегодня политический обозреватель Полина Конога и общественный деятель Вадим Боровик разбирают самые громкие темы, о которых говорят все. 31 октября собираем 🔪 такие грибы: 🍄 Встреча Путина, Трампа и Зеленского: будет ли и какие перспек…
❤3💋3🏆2💯2🔥1
Signed ️
Украинский кризис — операция США и Великобритании по сдерживанию ЕС, России и Китая СВО — не региональный конфликт. Это спланированная операция англосаксов: ослабить Европу как экономического конкурента, втянуть Россию в затяжную войну, не допустить её технологического усиления и создать плацдарм давления на Китай. 🔹 Технологическое сдерживание России — не побочный эффект, а цель. России отводят роль сырьевого прид…
👏5💯3🥰2❤1
Signed ️
🇧🇾 Встреча Делегата ВНС, депутата Вадима Боровика с коллективом «ДорОрса» стала площадкой для содержательного разговора о взаимосвязи личного и общественного — от крепости семейных устоев до стратегических вопросов национальной безопасности и экономической эффективности. 🔻Семья как опора государства Центральной темой обсуждения стала роль традиционных семейных ценностей. Вадим Боровик последовательно отстаивает п…
👍5❤3💯3🥰1
Signed ️
▶️ Зеленский взбесил Трампа! ЛЕТАЮЩАЯ TESLA! Белорусская хирургия УДИВИЛА! 🔥В новом выпуске проекта «Наедине с Боровиком» острый политический анализ главных событий недели! Сегодня политический обозреватель Полина Конога и общественный деятель Вадим Боровик разбирают самые громкие темы, о которых говорят все. 24 октября собираем 🔪 такие грибы: 🍄 Новые заявления Зеленского: как будет реагировать Трамп? 🍄 Операция н…
❤5👏3💯1🥰1
Signed ️
⚡️ Боровик: объективная оценка угроз и стратегии в период конфликта в Украине ⏳ Затягивание войны как инструмент сдерживания Западу невыгодно быстрое завершение конфликта. Цель — «тлеющий» сценарий, чтобы измотать Россию и подорвать социально-политическую стабильность изнутри. Дальнейшее затягивание — это колоссальное давление на российскую экономику и угроза национальным интересам. ⚠️ Вероятность войны России и …
👏5👍3💯2❤1
Signed ️
Showing the 12 most recent of 80 posts we hold for @borovikofficial. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@borovikofficial named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Borovik.official Вадим Боровик” (@borovikofficial), 21,539 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/borovikofficial.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.