National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 43 days, net +526. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 29,488–30,260 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 17:59
30,103
-23
15 Sept 2026, 16:59
30,126
-26
14 Sept 2026, 01:21
30,152
-19
12 Sept 2026, 09:16
30,171
+53
10 Sept 2026, 06:20
30,118
+105
6 Sept 2026, 20:57
30,013
-6
4 Sept 2026, 09:58
30,019
+58
3 Sept 2026, 00:29
29,961
+45
2 Sept 2026, 00:53
29,916
+42
1 Sept 2026, 02:05
29,874
+30
31 Aug 2026, 01:27
29,844
+52
30 Aug 2026, 03:44
29,792
+50
29 Aug 2026, 03:03
29,742
-37
28 Aug 2026, 03:06
29,779
+68
27 Aug 2026, 06:08
29,711
+37
26 Aug 2026, 09:23
29,674
+69
25 Aug 2026, 09:55
29,605
+17
24 Aug 2026, 13:03
29,588
+3
22 Aug 2026, 22:54
29,585
-1
21 Aug 2026, 14:14
29,586
first reading
Engagement
1,175 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 68 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
4.20%
avg views ÷ 30,103 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,260
542 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.497%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
542
of 1,175 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 505 of 542 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 September 2026
Posts held
1,175 (5 August 2026 – 22 September 2026)
Views total
685,190
Reactions total
3,253
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
22 Sept 2026, 13:25 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈74,300
Videos
≈56,700
Links
≈85,800
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
21h 04m
Average length
3m 10s
Measured directly from 400 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
6,101 reactions across 935 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
2,479
40.6%
❤
1,717
28.1%
😁
222
3.64%
👎
199
3.26%
🔥
197
3.23%
😢
171
2.80%
😱
152
2.49%
🙏
133
2.18%
👏
129
2.11%
🤬
127
2.08%
🤔
91
1.49%
🤯
78
1.28%
👌
72
1.18%
🎉
55
0.901%
💯
55
0.901%
🙈
53
0.869%
😭
50
0.82%
💔
49
0.803%
🥰
28
0.459%
🕊
19
0.311%
2 further kinds
25
0.41%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 942 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,101 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 10 August 2026 to 22 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🐎В РЦОП по конному спорту в Ратомке с 23 по 26 сентября пройдет чемпионат Беларуси по преодолению препятствий
Маршруты турнира характеризуются различной сложностью: от скоростных до классических — с перепрыжкой. Квалификационные маршруты с высотой препятствий от 120 до 145 см проверят техническую подготовленность спортивных пар.
За звание чемпиона Беларуси всадники будут бороться в финальном маршруте Гран-при с выс…
⁉️Когда-нибудь Лукашенко уйдет — но готовы ли белорусы справиться без него?
Игорь Тур:
Трижды только за последние годы мы были близки к тому, чтобы скатиться в проблемы для государства и государственности из-за отсутствия единства. Трижды Президент был вынужден принимать решения фактически в одиночку. Что будет в четвертый раз, десятый или сотый, когда все на себя взять он не сможет?
Мы в основном пока не хотим и б…
❗️Ограничения на посещение лесов введены в 5 районах Беларуси
При ограничении заходить в лес можно для прогулок, собрать грибы или ягоды. Въехать на территорию леса на машине нельзя, также запрещено разводить костры.
🟨Раздача денег на государственном уровне — каждому! Расскажем, где спрятан обман.
🟨Руководство столицы теперь пишет минчанам лично. Причем здесь проверка КГБ?
🟨Белоруска родила тройню — редкий случай! Как его используют фейкоделы в своих целях?
Разбираем последние шумные случаи сетевого и реального вранья вместе в новом выпуске проекта "Проверка слуха".
👉 Смотрите СЕГОДНЯ в 21:20 в эфире ОНТ и на нашем RUTUBE-канал
Лукашенко спросил чиновников о причинах снижения темпов ввода жилья в первом полугодии 2026 года
Президент обратил внимание, что в СМИ и соцсетях иногда появляются жалобы граждан на некомпетентность местных властей, бюрократические проволочки банков при выдаче жилищных кредитов и тому подобное.
⚡️Лукашенко поручил предоставить возможность выкупа арендного жилья у предприятий
"Главой государства поручено, чтобы мы создали возможность производить выкуп этого арендного жилья после достижения определенного стажа работы [на предприятии, которое построило и предоставило работнику арендное жилье]. Допустим, 15, 20, 25 лет", — заявил вице-премьер Александр Терехов.
❗️Рейды, "табло позора" и учет электросамокатов: как ГАИ наводит порядок на дорогах Беларуси?
В новом выпуске проекта "Лицом к лицу" — начальник Главного управления Государственной автомобильной инспекции МВД, полковник милиции Виктор Ротченков.
👇 В этом выпуске:
◽️Где в Беларуси чаще всего происходят ДТП?
◽️Сколько в стране бесправников и почему штрафы их не останавливают?
◽️Что будет с незарегистрированными самок…
Квартиры в привязке к рабочим местам. Лукашенко о задачах при строительстве арендного жилья
👍7
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,175 posts we hold for @ontnews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 214 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 86 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@ontnews named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@rt_russian named in 1 post, 7 September 2026 – 7 September 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 7 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Пул Первого @pul_1 · 251,158 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 10 August 2026
BELTA @belta_telegramm · 82,023 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 18 August 2026
Невольфович @nevolf · 28,787 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 16 September 2026
Дзермант @dzermant · 29,998 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 15 September 2026
Министерство обороны Республики Беларусь @modmilby · 36,234 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 2 September 2026
МВД Беларуси @pressmvd · 71,048 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 20 August 2026
ЖС Premium @zheltye_slivy_Belarus · 38,448 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 31 August 2026
Гайдукевич Олег @gajdukevichh · 43,422 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 15 September 2026
МАРТ @mart_gov_by · 23,229 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 18 September 2026
Smartpress.by / Новости @smartpress · 31,191 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 6 September 2026
Belorusneft_official @Belorusneft_official · 22,055 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 21 September 2026
Минск. Главное! @minsk_gl · 216,909 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 14 August 2026
Минск | Беларусь | Новости | Интересное @minsk_belaruss · 21,874 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 22 September 2026
Сильные Новости - gomel.today @gomeltoday · 21,777 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 22 September 2026
Цифровая грамотность @cifgram · 22,807 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 19 September 2026
ОХРАНА.BY @ohranaby · 26,631 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 12 September 2026
Гомель. Официально @Gomel_official · 28,252 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 9 September 2026
Витебск. Главное! @vitebsk · 43,160 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 28 August 2026
Беларусбанк: канал @belarusbank_channel · 36,903 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 1 September 2026
Минск Online @minsk_vesti · 32,795 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 4 September 2026
Могилёв - мой город! @moymogilev · 23,106 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 19 September 2026
Министерство труда и социальной защиты Республики Беларусь @MintrudSocBelarus · 25,220 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 14 September 2026
УГАИ ГУВД Мингорисполкома @gaiminsk · 38,050 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 1 September 2026
Милиция Минска @police_minsk · 22,525 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 20 September 2026
This channel appears in 34 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cross-platform identity — Wikidata
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
2 Wikipedia articles name this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
Богданович, Максим Адамович(ru.wikipedia.org) “…сделал клип с виртуальным образом поэта (2025){{Cite web|url=https://t.me/ontnews/188313|title=ПРЕМЬЕРА: БОГДАНОВИЧ ”ИСПОЛНИЛ” СВОЙ ХИТ “ЗОРКА ВЕНЕРА…” read 13 September 2026
Семенченко Семен Ігорович(uk.wikipedia.org) “…смогли — всех задержали белорусские спецслужбы.»{{Cite news|url=https://t.me/s/ontnews?before=67834|title=ONT NEWS|date=27.02.2022}}
Реакция российских…” read 13 September 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ONT NEWS” (@ontnews), 30,103 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ontnews.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.