International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 85% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
33 measurements spanning 43 days, net -130. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 19,495–19,690 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 20:16
19,517
-2
15 Sept 2026, 16:39
19,519
-4
13 Sept 2026, 23:59
19,523
-5
12 Sept 2026, 07:38
19,528
-5
10 Sept 2026, 02:58
19,533
-22
6 Sept 2026, 20:58
19,555
-10
4 Sept 2026, 04:40
19,565
-16
2 Sept 2026, 17:38
19,581
-14
1 Sept 2026, 14:36
19,595
-6
31 Aug 2026, 11:06
19,601
-4
30 Aug 2026, 12:44
19,605
-3
29 Aug 2026, 15:33
19,608
-9
28 Aug 2026, 14:08
19,617
-11
27 Aug 2026, 10:49
19,628
-3
25 Aug 2026, 15:15
19,631
-6
24 Aug 2026, 16:47
19,637
-17
21 Aug 2026, 16:38
19,654
-5
20 Aug 2026, 18:18
19,659
-3
19 Aug 2026, 15:12
19,662
-3
18 Aug 2026, 16:23
19,665
first reading
Engagement
894 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 56 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
3.60%
avg views ÷ 19,517 subscribers
Avg views / post
702
263 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.36%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
263
of 894 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 257 of 263 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held
894 (5 August 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total
184,714
Reactions total
4,325
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 01:03 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
3h 21m
Average length
52s
Measured directly from 232 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
14,975 reactions across 855 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
3,883
25.9%
❤
2,467
16.5%
🤡
997
6.66%
🙏
935
6.24%
😁
905
6.04%
😱
807
5.39%
🤣
767
5.12%
🔥
765
5.11%
🤬
695
4.64%
👏
658
4.39%
🤔
441
2.94%
😢
316
2.11%
💯
289
1.93%
👎
233
1.56%
🤪
212
1.42%
🤯
198
1.32%
🎉
169
1.13%
🥰
89
0.594%
😭
50
0.334%
❤🔥
36
0.24%
4 further kinds
63
0.421%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 876 of the 894 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 15,369 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 894 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
💬«Красная Поляна. Медведь. Мы едем. Человек бежит. Человек через забор прыгает».
Бегущий вдоль дороги медведь замечен в районе посёлка Эсто-Садок в Краснодарском крае. А вблизи Улан-Удэ полиция обезвредила агрессивного зверя, который вышел из леса к жилым корпусам базы отдыха.
Подобные случаи в последнее время участились и в других регионах РФ. Например, в природном парке «Ергаки» в Красноярском крае закрыли турист…
Трамп признался, что рад тому, что принц Гарри с семьей уехали из США в Великобританию.
"Мне показалось, что они проявили крайнее неуважение к королевской семье. Мне это не понравилось", - сказал президент журналистам в ответ на просьбу прокомментировать отъезд принца.
Он подчеркнул, что у него сложились отличные отношения и с покойной королевой Елизавете II, и с ее преемником Карлом III.
"Может быть, я от них отл…
ВС США уничтожили 28 кораблей в Ормузском проливе в ночь на 1 сентября, заявил Трамп в интервью автору подкаста Lt. Dan Дэну Патрику.
Читайте нас в МАХ
Альпинисту в Австрии вернули рюкзак и вещи, которые он потерял в горах 63 года назад
В 1963 году тогда еще 23-летний парень (сейчас ему 86) сорвался в ледяную расщелину на высоте почти 3000 метров. Друзья его благополучно вытащили, но ради спасения пришлось бросить рюкзак.
Спустя кучу лет из-за таяния ледников вещи оказались на поверхности: среди них были ледоруб, трубка, фотоаппарат и потрепанные документы, по кот…
Третья попытка импичмента Трампа после промежуточных выборов в Конгресс фактически неизбежна. С такой оценкой выступила газета The Hill.
Американские аналитики "сходятся во мнении о том, что республиканцы [по результатам выборов] лишатся своего скромного большинства в Палате представителей", отмечает издание.
Читайте нас в МАХ
Число умерших в ДР Конго от Эболы превысило 3 тыс, сообщило министерство связи и по делам СМИ.
Общее количество заразившихся составляет 6 186, причем 86 случаев были выявлены за последние 24 часа. Летальность достигает 48,6%.
Читайте нас в МАХ
Германия столкнулась с дефицитом сардин, ситуация затрагивает всю Европу.
Дефицит подтвердили компании Lidl, Kaufland, Picnic. Причиной нехватки сырья стало снижение добычи в рыболовном регионе к западу от Марокко, сообщает агентство DPA.
Читайте нас в МАХ
🥔В Беларуси приступили к уборке «второго хлеба».
Первыми комбайны в картофельные поля вывели хозяйства юга республики — Брестской области. Причем эта кампания — еще и проверка новых технологий. Корреспондент «МИР 24» Андрей Зражевский изучил модельный ряд.
Читайте нас в МАХ
Доллар Трампа, приуроченный к 250-летию независимости страны, выпустили в США.
Монеты продают по 154$ за сотню - примерно полтора доллара за штуку.
Читайте нас в МАХ
🤡23😁4❤2🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 894 posts we hold for @radiomirby. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 27 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
4
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
4
vacant every time we have ever looked
@radiomirby named 4 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@rt_russian named in 5 posts, 10 August 2026 – 3 September 2026
@rian_ru named in 5 posts, 10 August 2026 – 2 September 2026
@sputniklive named in 4 posts, 8 August 2026 – 25 August 2026
@sputnikby named in 1 post, 25 August 2026 – 25 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
BALTNEWS @baltnews · 24,444 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 16 September 2026
ONT NEWS @ontnews · 30,103 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 7 September 2026
Минск-Новости @minsknews_by · 22,818 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 19 September 2026
Главный. Тур @glav_tur · 21,074 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 25 September 2026
МАРТ @mart_gov_by · 23,229 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 18 September 2026
Минская правда|MLYN.by @mlynby · 21,276 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 24 September 2026
ЖС Premium @zheltye_slivy_Belarus · 38,448 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 31 August 2026
BELTA @belta_telegramm · 82,023 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 18 August 2026
Официальный Минздрав - новости здравоохранения и фармацевтики Республики Беларусь @minzdravbelarus · 32,530 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 5 September 2026
Министерство обороны Республики Беларусь @modmilby · 36,234 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 2 September 2026
Невольфович @nevolf · 28,787 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 16 September 2026
Гайдукевич Олег @gajdukevichh · 43,422 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 15 September 2026
МЧС Беларуси @mchs112by · 45,526 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 27 August 2026
УГАИ ГУВД Мингорисполкома @gaiminsk · 38,050 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 1 September 2026
Следственный комитет Беларуси @skgovby · 30,373 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 7 September 2026
МВД Беларуси @pressmvd · 71,048 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 20 August 2026
Дзермант @dzermant · 29,998 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 15 September 2026
Картотека @kartotekaio · 260,921 Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 31 August 2026
Министерство труда и социальной защиты Республики Беларусь @MintrudSocBelarus · 25,220 Telegram ranks this channel #87 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 14 September 2026
Милиция Минска @police_minsk · 22,525 Telegram ranks this channel #90 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 20 September 2026
This channel appears in 20 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“MIRBY” (@radiomirby), 19,517 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/radiomirby.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.