Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Придыбайло

Channel

Придыбайло

@pridybaylo_k

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

15,159subscribers

-67 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001673975057
TypeChannel
Username@pridybaylo_k
Created23 September 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held32
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/pridybaylo_k

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 64% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

15,15615,24215,1995 August 2026 — 15,226 subscribers6 August 2026 — 15,226 subscribers6 August 2026 — 15,220 subscribers7 August 2026 — 15,218 subscribers8 August 2026 — 15,214 subscribers9 August 2026 — 15,207 subscribers10 August 2026 — 15,205 subscribers11 August 2026 — 15,227 subscribers12 August 2026 — 15,240 subscribers13 August 2026 — 15,242 subscribers14 August 2026 — 15,233 subscribers16 August 2026 — 15,229 subscribers17 August 2026 — 15,228 subscribers18 August 2026 — 15,219 subscribers19 August 2026 — 15,221 subscribers20 August 2026 — 15,225 subscribers21 August 2026 — 15,220 subscribers25 August 2026 — 15,216 subscribers26 August 2026 — 15,213 subscribers27 August 2026 — 15,207 subscribers29 August 2026 — 15,202 subscribers29 August 2026 — 15,208 subscribers31 August 2026 — 15,207 subscribers1 September 2026 — 15,196 subscribers2 September 2026 — 15,191 subscribers4 September 2026 — 15,181 subscribers7 September 2026 — 15,183 subscribers10 September 2026 — 15,170 subscribers12 September 2026 — 15,156 subscribers14 September 2026 — 15,169 subscribers15 September 2026 — 15,165 subscribers18 September 2026 — 15,159 subscribers15,1595 August 202618 September 2026
32 measurements spanning 43 days, net -67. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,143–15,255 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 03:4115,159-6
15 Sept 2026, 21:2115,165-4
14 Sept 2026, 08:2115,169+13
12 Sept 2026, 19:4115,156-14
10 Sept 2026, 17:1815,170-13
7 Sept 2026, 15:2015,183+2
4 Sept 2026, 18:3715,181-10
2 Sept 2026, 03:4815,191-5
1 Sept 2026, 05:4515,196-11
31 Aug 2026, 02:2415,207-1
29 Aug 2026, 22:5715,208+6
29 Aug 2026, 00:3515,202-5
27 Aug 2026, 21:5815,207-6
26 Aug 2026, 22:2715,213-3
25 Aug 2026, 22:0215,216-4
21 Aug 2026, 22:2915,220-5
20 Aug 2026, 19:4515,225+4
19 Aug 2026, 19:1215,221+2
18 Aug 2026, 17:0715,219-9
17 Aug 2026, 19:3615,228first reading

Engagement

223 posts held, back to 2 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 53 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.4%
avg views ÷ 15,159 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,890
69 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.37%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
70
of 223 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held223 (2 August 20263 September 2026)
Views total130,200
Reactions total3,088
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 10:55 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2h 56m
Average length
2m 27s

Measured directly from 72 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

10,963 reactions across 204 posts, in 52 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💯1,86017.0%
👍1,33612.2%
1,32612.1%
🤡1,25711.5%
😁1,23411.3%
🤣1,18810.8%
🔥4944.51%
🤮4714.30%
👏3523.21%
❤‍🔥2151.96%
💩2031.85%
🤬1671.52%
🖕1261.15%
1080.985%
👎800.73%
🤔630.575%
🥰480.438%
🤯430.392%
👀380.347%
😢380.347%
32 further kinds3162.88%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 222 of the 223 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11,787 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 223 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
6
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 222 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @pridybaylo_k. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 223 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 August 2026 to 3 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

3 Sept 2026, 10:36 UTC217 views1 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Я русский понимаю лучше, чем белорусский. Так сказал какой-то украинский «комик» среди «белорусских комиков». Попутно обосрал белорусский язык, сказав, что так говорит его пьяная тётка. На видео есть мразь, которой запрещён въезд в Россию.

🤬1

3 Sept 2026, 10:21 UTC292 views4 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

"Нет такой сферы докуда Дональд Трамп не дотянулся" — к такому выводу пришел Константин Придыбайло Ведущие программы "эКспрессо" Константин Придыбайло, Артём Муратов и Игорь Пименов обсудили новые монеты с изображением американского лидера. 📍В скором времени Дональд Трамп станет первым человеком за 150 лет, чье изображение появится и на банкноте США. 👉 Полную версию смотрите в ВК и RUTUBE 📌 Подписаться на Радио

3🔥1

3 Sept 2026, 09:17 UTC598 views42 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Мобилизация — ВСЁ. Путин в очередной раз подтвердил, что эта тема — психологическая и информационная атака.

👍15🤡13💩4🖕4👎2🔥2🤬1🤮1

3 Sept 2026, 08:38 UTC673 views15 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

и кабачки собирать, да картошку копать. Подтверждаю. скрин экстремистского проекта

🤣15

3 Sept 2026, 08:03 UTC713 views9 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Договориться между собой должны прежде всего Россия и Украина. Путин о том, как "третьи страны" лезут в переговоры.

4👍3🤡2

3 Sept 2026, 06:28 UTC914 views41 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Знаете в чем отличие Путина от политиков европейских стран? Он всегда говорит о будущем. О целях развития. Как сейчас на ВЭФ. А с той стороны сами себя толкают вниз: санкции, ограничения, снижение.

👍26🤡8💯5🤝2

3 Sept 2026, 05:32 UTC≈1,010 views21 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

А теперь Ëжик! Помните песню про бобра? Там создатели трека поняли, что нет смысла бороться с бобром и говорить, что вообще-то они серьезные музыканты и вместе с певицей Чили (помните такую?) выпустили клип про Ёжика «из вселенной бобра». Не уверен, что залетит.

🤣21

3 Sept 2026, 04:04 UTC992 views7 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

☕️ Утренний "эКспрессо" на радио Sputnik В эфире Константин Придыбайло, Игорь Пименов и Артём Муратов. 3 сентября: история песни Михаила Шуфутинского и мемов о ней; Лавров: отделения института Гете в России закроют после закрытия Русского дома; объявлен шорт-лист "Слова года — 2026": от "беспилотников" и "НПЗ" до "колобка" и "ред-флага". Подключайтесь на 91.2FM в Москве и 91.5FM в Петербурге. Смотрите в ВК | RUTU

7

2 Sept 2026, 14:17 UTC≈1,350 views118 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @kargo_baneks

МИД Германии вызывает посла России: - Ваши дроны пытались поразить наши самолёты. - Уточните, пожалуйста: пытались или поразили? - Пытались. - Это не наши дроны

🤣74💯30👏7💩3🔥21🤡1

2 Sept 2026, 12:11 UTC≈1,460 views29 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Для кого-то осень это небо, плачущее небо под ногами. А для некоторых это новые выпуски треш-реалити. К «Ждулям» добавились ждуны. «Маменькин сынок» возвращается. А «Беременна в 16» — золотой стандарт. Признайся, ждешь?

🤮26💩3

2 Sept 2026, 09:41 UTC≈1,690 views45 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Среди хаоса и треша на Китай-городе в Москве есть место красивому и интересному.

18😁14🤮5🔥3🤔2🤣2💩1

2 Sept 2026, 07:45 UTC≈1,470 views61 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @imnotbozhenaPhoto

Досмотрела «Чудо» с Галич про типа Блиновскую. Это, по сути, памятник всем инфоцыганам. И апокрифическое житие Блиновской при жизни. Осталось только ее канонизировать после того, как откинется с зоны. Невинная, побитая толпой, женщина, современная ведунья, растерзанная жестокой толпой, преданная своими друзьями и даже родственниками. Не понятая. По сюжету это не она государство обманывала, это ее подставили. А она р

💯448👍4🤡2😁2🙈1

Showing the 12 most recent of 223 posts we hold for @pridybaylo_k. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@pridybaylo_k edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
9 August 2026
Most recent edit
9 August 2026

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

10 Aug 2026, 15:47 UTCAnonymous Poll448 voters

«Яблоко» нужно

  1. Снять62%
  2. Не снимать39%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 223 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 3 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 39 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Дзермант
@dzermant · 29,998
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 15 September 2026
Антон Шабашов
@antohakrasava · 37,704
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 31 August 2026
ONT NEWS
@ontnews · 30,103
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 7 September 2026
ЖС Premium
@zheltye_slivy_Belarus · 38,448
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 31 August 2026
Невольфович
@nevolf · 28,787
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 16 September 2026
Гайдукевич Олег
@gajdukevichh · 43,422
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 15 September 2026
PASHA TODAY
@pashatoday_new · 27,527
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 10 September 2026
На кухне у повара
@kitchen_chef · 84,311
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 18 August 2026

This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Придыбайло” (@pridybaylo_k), 15,159 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pridybaylo_k.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.