Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Нещадим

Channel

Нещадим

@dneschadim

Not marked by Telegram, checked 31 August 2026

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

141subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 30 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002218689824
TypeChannel
Username@dneschadim
DescriptionСамый быстрый корреспондент 🏃🏼‍♀️ Ведущая. Главная по соцсетям.
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded30 August 2026
Last confirmed live31 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/dneschadim

Growth

14130 Aug 2026, 16:01 — 141 subscribers30 Aug 2026, 16:15 — 141 subscribers30 Aug 2026, 16:0130 Aug 2026, 16:15
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 140–142 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 16:15141no change
30 Aug 2026, 16:01141first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 20 November 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
167
Videos
107
Links
108

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
9m 51s
Average length
2m 28s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

125 reactions across 20 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥3427.2%
👍2520.0%
1612.8%
1310.4%
😁129.60%
🤣108.00%
😢64.80%
👌32.40%
🐳21.60%
😡21.60%
💯10.8%
🫡10.8%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 125 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 November 2025 to 16 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

16 Apr 2026, 18:20 UTC227 views7 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Forwarded from @ontnewsPhoto

⚡️НОВЫЙ ВЫПУСК ПРОЕКТА ОНТ "ТИК-ТОЛК" О каникулах в лагере обычно вспоминают с теплом и трепетом. Особенно поколение постарше, но современные дети тоже в теме, вопреки стереотипам. В это время в соцсетях родители обсуждают цены на путевки, переживая и за длительность каникул. 👉Сколько стоит отправить ребенка в летний лагерь — в рубрике "Тик-Толк".

🔥42👍1

14 Apr 2026, 13:29 UTC220 views3 reactionsread 30 August 2026

Интересно с «Чытанкай» получается Несколько лет назад узнала о приложении на книжной выставке - презентовала его тогда, насколько помню, Белкнига. Тогда приятно удивилась: всё отлично работало. Помню, на какое-то время аудиоспектакли на мове легко заменили музыку в наушниках. Но контента было маловато. И вот, спустя время, библиотека наконец пополнилась (сейчас в разделе «мастацкая» 156 файлов). А ещё появились прои

11👍1

14 Apr 2026, 13:02 UTC172 views3 reactionsread 30 August 2026

Стало тревожно за Шулейко, коллеги. Говорят, корм всё-таки попробовали.

🐳1👌1🤣1

11 Apr 2026, 20:44 UTC180 views3 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Forwarded from @ontnewsVideo

🪵Росли деревья — теперь пни. В сети возмущаются вырубкой парка в Медвежино Любую вновь образовавшуюся в городской черте поляну местные жители зачастую воспринимают как трагедию. Так случилось и в минском районе Медвежино. Вообще, так бывает. И непонятно, кто кому должен уступить территорию: город лесу или природой можно пожертвовать ради строительства. А с другой стороны, Беларусь ведь лесная страна. Едва ли не каж

1👍1🔥1

9 Apr 2026, 18:43 UTC148 views8 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Forwarded from @ontnewsPhoto

⚡️НОВЫЙ ВЫПУСК ПРОЕКТА ОНТ "ТИК-ТОЛК" В соцсетях разлетаются видео о вырубленных деревьях: пользователи переживают о судьбе лесопарка в крупнейшем районе Минска. В комментариях — возмущения и мнимые догадки о причинах. 👉Кто и почему разрушает лес, и что появится на поляне — в рубрике "Тик-Толк".

👍4🔥31

9 Apr 2026, 11:46 UTC135 views7 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Forwarded from @ontnewsVideo

❗️Деревья под топором: начало большой стройки или спасение леса? В соцсетях разлетаются видео о вырубленных деревьях: пользователи переживают о судьбе лесопарка в крупнейшем районе Минска. В комментариях — возмущения и мнимые догадки о причинах. Кто и почему разрушает лес, и что появится на поляне — разберемся в новом выпуске проекта "Тик‑Толк". 👉🏻Смотрите сегодня в 21:20 в эфире ОНТ и на нашем RUTUBE-канале!

🔥4👍21

7 Apr 2026, 13:49 UTC149 views8 reactionsread 30 August 2026

Всё же умеют москвичи в театр приглашать

😁5👍2🔥1

7 Apr 2026, 10:31 UTC139 views5 reactionsread 30 August 2026

Григорий в медиаполе как баян в оркестре. Неожиданно и громко

2👍2🔥1

6 Apr 2026, 12:23 UTC127 views8 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Forwarded from @BelarusMFAVideo

🗣️ Заявление МИД Беларуси в связи с блокированием сервисом YouTube аккаунтов СМИ Беларуси 3 апреля 2026 г. администрация YouTube произвольно удалила каналы крупнейших белорусских национальных средств массовой информации – БелТА, ОНТ и СТВ. Эти медиа являются основой информационного суверенитета страны и обладают многомиллионной аудиторией как внутри Беларуси, так и за ее пределами. Своим решением YouTube фактически

👍4🔥2😢2

5 Apr 2026, 10:17 UTC135 views7 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

Может, и манулу Тимофею из Москвы пара у нас всё же найдётся?

😁61

5 Apr 2026, 09:10 UTC144 views5 reactionsread 30 August 2026

В Трэдс истерика от уехавших. Ох и триггернул пост В комментах ликуют о блокировке наших СМИ. Отозвалась и одна домохозяйка. Пишет, мол «нешта не зразумела» и предложила определиться с общей позицией. А то ж постом раньше кто-то в её ленте писал, что не смотрел новости на Ютьюбе. Может, для кого-то открою секрет: ваша лента настроена под вас. А мир намного шире, чем ваша подписота. Хотя и их старания в продвижении

🔥31👍1

3 Apr 2026, 20:12 UTC318 views7 reactionsread 30 August 2026

У меня нет и малейших сомнений

🔥3🤣3💯1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @dneschadim. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Лапша Медиа
@lapshamedia · 39,745
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 30 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Нещадим” (@dneschadim), 141 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dneschadim.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.