Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Brandmauer Report

Channel

Brandmauer Report

@brandmauer_report

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

746subscribers

+21 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004241844139
TypeChannel
Username@brandmauer_report
CreatedBetween 1 May 2026 and 31 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/brandmauer_report

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 52% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

5957636796 August 2026 — 725 subscribers6 August 2026 — 725 subscribers6 August 2026 — 701 subscribers13 August 2026 — 595 subscribers20 August 2026 — 596 subscribers27 August 2026 — 763 subscribers3 September 2026 — 753 subscribers12 September 2026 — 750 subscribers19 September 2026 — 746 subscribers7466 August 202619 September 2026
9 measurements spanning 44 days, net +21. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 570–788 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 12:58746-4
12 Sept 2026, 00:39750-3
3 Sept 2026, 13:38753-10
27 Aug 2026, 08:34763+167
20 Aug 2026, 16:04596+1
13 Aug 2026, 14:08595-106
6 Aug 2026, 21:35701-24
6 Aug 2026, 18:30725no change
6 Aug 2026, 18:19725first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

14 reactions across 9 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 78.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1178.6%
💩17.14%
🔥17.14%
🤔17.14%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 14 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 15:26 UTC54 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Pakistan's Crackdown on Speech Draws International Alarm Censorship blocking · 04.08.2026 Pakistan continues assembling a full toolkit for stifling free speech, and this time the international human rights community's response came swiftly. ARTICLE 19, together with Amnesty International, HRCP, Digital Rights Foundation, and a dozen other organizations, sent a letter to Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif and two minister

🤔1

6 Aug 2026, 13:16 UTC75 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Data Sovereignty Isn't the Same as Resilience Surveillance control · 05.08.2026 Southeast Asia is racing to build data centers, and along with them — data sovereignty laws. The logic is simple: sensitive information should physically stay within the country. It sounds like concern for security and citizen protection, and in theory, it is. But the industry is already hinting that the conversation needs to move beyon

💩1

6 Aug 2026, 09:31 UTC74 viewsread 6 August 2026

Zambia's 2026 vote: a test for keeping the internet on Shutdowns · 05.08.2026 Zambia is preparing for elections on August 13, 2026, and more than 370 organizations from 106 countries have decided to remind President Hakainde Hichilema of a simple thing: it's better not to shut down the internet during voting. Yes, this has to be spelled out in a separate letter — because, unfortunately, the practice is not uncommon.

6 Aug 2026, 08:31 UTC83 viewsread 6 August 2026

China Tightens Exit Rules Citing Tech Security Risks Surveillance control · 05.08.2026 China has tightened its exit rules, citing risks to technological security. The wording is as vague as it gets, but the gist is simple: citizens' departures can now be restricted under the pretext of protecting certain technological secrets. What exactly counts as a security threat remains an open question — and that's no acciden

6 Aug 2026, 07:58 UTC88 views0 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Roskomnadzor Launches Massive VPN Crackdown Censorship blocking · 06.08.2026 Roskomnadzor appears to have carried out one of the largest crackdowns on VPN services in the history of Russian internet blocking. On August 4, one popular VPN service reported a new attack on circumvention tools that had already been underway for several days. The service didn't disclose details, but the problem turned out to be widespre

5 Aug 2026, 11:16 UTC113 viewsread 6 August 2026

Data Consolidation: When Convenience Becomes Surveillance Surveillance control · 04.08.2026 The Center for Democracy and Technology has released a report with a wonderfully simple title — "What Is a Database?" It sounds like a first-year computer science question, but it's not: this is an examination of how the U.S. federal government is stitching together data long scattered across states and municipalities into un

4 Aug 2026, 15:26 UTC114 viewsread 6 August 2026

AI Access Gap: Infrastructure, Skills, and a Cautionary Tale 04.08.2026 AI for everyone — that's what the marketing says. In practice, it's business as usual: the pie gets divided wherever there's already infrastructure, skills, and institutions in place, while everyone else gets crumbs and an instruction to "adapt." Here are the dry numbers. The US holds more than 5,000 data centers — 10 times more than any other

4 Aug 2026, 13:26 UTC109 viewsread 6 August 2026

DDoS attacks as a data-driven censorship tool Censorship blocking · 04.08.2026 Turns out DDoSing independent media isn't just script-kiddie mischief — it's a fully formed censorship instrument. With actual scientific methodology, no less. Here are the facts. This year, at least seven exiled Belarusian media outlets were hit by DDoS attacks, and staff link them directly to coverage of political topics. In Serbia, a

4 Aug 2026, 10:51 UTC105 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

EU extends chat control scanning regime to 2028 Surveillance control · 04.08.2026 The EU has extended the temporary "chat control" regime until April 2028. The vote went off without drama: 25 countries in favor, one against, one abstained — via written procedure, with no extra noise, in the spirit of "we're just extending what's already working anyway." The essence of the regime: platforms get the right to voluntar

👍1

4 Aug 2026, 09:21 UTC111 viewsread 6 August 2026

Italy quietly blocks abortion info sites online Censorship blocking · 04.08.2026 In Italy, legal abortion exists only to the extent that doctors are willing to perform it — and that, it turns out, is a problem: 67% of the country's gynecologists refuse the procedure on "moral grounds," and some hospitals report a 100% refusal rate. On top of that, there's a mandatory week-long waiting period, which easily pushes a p

4 Aug 2026, 07:57 UTC120 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Yarovaya Law at Ten: Failure That Reshaped FSB Power Surveillance control · 03.08.2026 The "Yarovaya Law" turns ten. In all this time, it never learned to store all of Russians' internet traffic — but it did manage to reshape the balance of power within the FSB. In 2022, the number of fake bomb threat reports grew almost tenfold, exceeding 20,000. Courts were evacuated several times a day, and the FSB's Second Serv

👍1

3 Aug 2026, 10:46 UTC131 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Cockroaches Outmaneuver Censors in India Censorship blocking · 03.08.2026 Cockroaches vs. the state — and the cockroaches are winning. Indian regulators went for the old playbook to shut down the Cockroach Janta Party: Section 69A of the IT Act, blocking the domain cockroachjantaparty.org, notices against the @CockroachParty account on X. Classic move — chop off the head, and the movement dies. It didn't. The part

👍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @brandmauer_report. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Brandmauer Report” (@brandmauer_report), 746 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/brandmauer_report.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.