Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Килина

Channel

Килина

@by_Kilina

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

11,203subscribers

+111 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002497069890
TypeChannel
Username@by_Kilina
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held28
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/by_Kilina

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 56% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

11,09211,22511,158.57 August 2026 — 11,092 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,102 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,138 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,150 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,162 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,161 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,165 subscribers13 August 2026 — 11,167 subscribers14 August 2026 — 11,165 subscribers16 August 2026 — 11,167 subscribers17 August 2026 — 11,170 subscribers18 August 2026 — 11,175 subscribers20 August 2026 — 11,178 subscribers22 August 2026 — 11,172 subscribers24 August 2026 — 11,170 subscribers25 August 2026 — 11,168 subscribers26 August 2026 — 11,167 subscribers27 August 2026 — 11,164 subscribers28 August 2026 — 11,167 subscribers29 August 2026 — 11,168 subscribers1 September 2026 — 11,164 subscribers3 September 2026 — 11,205 subscribers6 September 2026 — 11,225 subscribers9 September 2026 — 11,220 subscribers12 September 2026 — 11,211 subscribers13 September 2026 — 11,205 subscribers15 September 2026 — 11,206 subscribers17 September 2026 — 11,203 subscribers11,2037 August 202617 September 2026
28 measurements spanning 41 days, net +111. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,072–11,245 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 28
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 16:2111,203-3
15 Sept 2026, 13:1911,206+1
13 Sept 2026, 20:4111,205-6
12 Sept 2026, 00:4011,211-9
9 Sept 2026, 14:5911,220-5
6 Sept 2026, 09:5611,225+20
3 Sept 2026, 22:3811,205+41
1 Sept 2026, 13:2411,164-4
29 Aug 2026, 05:2411,168+1
28 Aug 2026, 06:5211,167+3
27 Aug 2026, 07:4211,164-3
26 Aug 2026, 07:1211,167-1
25 Aug 2026, 04:1511,168-2
24 Aug 2026, 01:2711,170-2
22 Aug 2026, 08:3511,172-6
20 Aug 2026, 19:3511,178+3
18 Aug 2026, 23:0811,175+5
17 Aug 2026, 19:2911,170+3
16 Aug 2026, 15:2311,167+2
14 Aug 2026, 23:3811,165first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 28 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 42 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.4%
avg views ÷ 11,203 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,390
1 post measured
Reaction rate
32.7%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held19 (28 June 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total1,390
Reactions total454
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 01:53 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4m 52s
Average length
1m 13s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

7,088 reactions across 19 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥3,26646.1%
🔥1,96627.7%
😁1,28018.1%
👍3114.39%
🤩2012.84%
💯640.903%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,088 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 28 June 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 18:49 UTC≈1,390 views454 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Я не люблю писать о команде🏀 вообще делаю это через силу, если честно. И нет, не потому что не люблю эту часть своей жизни. На удивление, очень люблю. Это стало некой несущей конструкцией. Не люблю, потому что у нас не получается, как в кино. На самом деле ни у кого не должно получаться, как в кино. А если и получается, то это «ошибка выжившего». В кино ведь оно как? Ты сильно веришь в идею, ты собираешь пацанов и…

❤‍🔥290🔥102💯53👍8🤩1

23 Aug 2026, 15:57 UTC≈4,250 views340 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Итак, рубрика #две_книги_ноль_выводов - потому что мы тут не для выводов и не на скорость читаем, а просто для удовольствия. В этот раз у нас: 1️⃣ Эти ваши «Тревожные люди» Фредрик Бакман. Меня чуть не укачало, чесслово, но это было классно. Задорно, весело (я несколько раз прям хихикнула), остроумно и динамично. Я пока только учусь читать художку, но как же автор их всех чувствует. Он подмечает такие мелочи, такие …

❤‍🔥222🔥68👍50

23 Aug 2026, 15:20 UTC≈3,920 views244 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Единственное моё дело на сегодня - написать пост про книги в ТГ (Потому что они скопились безбожно). Единственное моё дело на неделю - провести проект-вспышку (очень это люблю, всё уже готово, я просто незримо учавствую) и… увидеть Волгу. Это что вообще такое я вас спрашиваю? Это как вообще? *это мы на турнир в Тольятти команду вывозим. Фото из поезда грузиться будет 1000 лет. Но с другой стороны, а че еще делать?…

❤‍🔥180🔥56👍8

21 Aug 2026, 15:45 UTC≈4,380 views274 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

На днях делала серию сториусов и немного по пути присвоила себе всемогущества))) Посыл был таков, что я могу вести проект по планированию и организации жизни, потому что если бы я этого не умела, то фиг бы я вообще в своем уме осталась с теми ролями и задачами, что у меня есть. И то что я спустя 7 лет переупаковала этот проект, дак это потому что я родила еще пару детей, прошла пару учеб, прочла пару сотен книг и з…

❤‍🔥177🔥86👍11

6 Aug 2026, 17:06 UTC≈7,010 views322 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Итак, книги буду выкладывать парами. Чтоб вы тоже мне рекомендовать новенькое успевали (говорю так, будто не читаю как улитка). Короче я сделаю рубрику #две_книги_ноль_выводов - потому что мы тут не для выводов и не на скорость читаем, а просто для удовольствия. Итак. В этот раз у нас: 1️⃣ «Позже» Стивен Кинг. Мой первый осознанный Кинг. Я ненавижу ужасы, поэтому из Кинга я читала за всю свою жизнь только «Как пис…

🔥191❤‍🔥96😁27👍8

26 Jul 2026, 15:23 UTC≈8,890 views514 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Посмотрела ну чудо какой добрый фильм. С детьми. Улыбалась целый час. Ела голубику, обнимала дочь и улыбалась. В фильме не происходит ничего. Но он абсолютно прекрасен. Его снял Джон Траволта. Он, помимо актера, пилот-фанатик. И коллекционер частных самолетов. И вообще не последний человек в авиа-сообществе. И мне кажется этот фильм - это какой-то его переработанный опыт. Какой-то прекрасный и прекрасно-переработан…

❤‍🔥323🔥138👍41🤩12

13 Jul 2026, 17:09 UTC≈9,410 views363 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @dybkbaimVideo

1️⃣ цикл 1️⃣ учебно-тренировочного сбора. 💥 🔥 Обновленный состав ДЮБК «БАИМ» г. Краснодар. #ПрактикаБаскетбола #БАИМ

🔥284❤‍🔥74😁5

13 Jul 2026, 15:27 UTC≈8,900 views93 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Poll

Видео с пацанами хотим?

  1. Всегда хотим98%
  2. Да нафиг оно, Оль?2%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

🔥63❤‍🔥23💯7

13 Jul 2026, 12:50 UTC≈7,850 views263 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Рубрика: спорт-спорт-турбоспорт (нет) Но решила вас держать в курсе своих движений с командой. Спортивный подкаст получается. Но я стараюсь сделать это полезным для всех. Даже если из спорта у вас только ритерспорт 🍫

❤‍🔥130😁94👍24🔥15

13 Jul 2026, 12:47 UTC≈8,170 views134 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥88👍29🔥17

10 Jul 2026, 20:14 UTC≈9,170 views325 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Я будто прочла две противоположные книги. Обе мне не понравились, но ни об одной не пожалела. Интригаааааа #две_книги_ноль_выводов «Йелоуфейс» - очень понравилась изнанка издательского дела. Никогда не думала, что в художке все вот так. Щас начала другую книгу - и походу да. Именно так. И от людей из этой сферы слышала, что это жиза. Позновательно. Но какой же медленный сюжет. Просто читаешь какую то чужую мысленну…

❤‍🔥166🔥79🤩57👍19😁4

8 Jul 2026, 16:22 UTC≈8,260 views397 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

На самом деле вот я с БАИМом в этом месяце😅

❤‍🔥239🔥102👍44🤩12

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @by_Kilina. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

13 Jul 2026, 15:27 UTCAnonymous Poll871 voters

Видео с пацанами хотим?

  1. Всегда хотим98%
  2. Да нафиг оно, Оль?2%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 28 June 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Килина” (@by_Kilina), 11,203 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/by_Kilina.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.