Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for C4E Announcements

Channel

C4E Announcements

@c4e_announcements

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

14,223subscribers

-450 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001766687723
TypeChannel
Username@c4e_announcements
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 September 2026
Measurements held30
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/c4e_announcements

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 52% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

14,22314,67314,4486 August 2026 — 14,673 subscribers6 August 2026 — 14,669 subscribers7 August 2026 — 14,667 subscribers9 August 2026 — 14,655 subscribers9 August 2026 — 14,653 subscribers11 August 2026 — 14,639 subscribers12 August 2026 — 14,628 subscribers13 August 2026 — 14,618 subscribers14 August 2026 — 14,603 subscribers15 August 2026 — 14,588 subscribers16 August 2026 — 14,571 subscribers17 August 2026 — 14,552 subscribers18 August 2026 — 14,534 subscribers19 August 2026 — 14,518 subscribers20 August 2026 — 14,511 subscribers21 August 2026 — 14,495 subscribers23 August 2026 — 14,475 subscribers24 August 2026 — 14,443 subscribers25 August 2026 — 14,423 subscribers26 August 2026 — 14,416 subscribers28 August 2026 — 14,404 subscribers28 August 2026 — 14,397 subscribers29 August 2026 — 14,379 subscribers30 August 2026 — 14,359 subscribers31 August 2026 — 14,339 subscribers1 September 2026 — 14,326 subscribers3 September 2026 — 14,313 subscribers4 September 2026 — 14,298 subscribers7 September 2026 — 14,269 subscribers10 September 2026 — 14,223 subscribers6 August 202610 September 2026
30 measurements spanning 35 days, net -450. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,156–14,741 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 30
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Sept 2026, 22:3814,223-46
7 Sept 2026, 21:3614,269-29
4 Sept 2026, 17:5614,298-15
3 Sept 2026, 00:3614,313-13
1 Sept 2026, 22:0614,326-13
31 Aug 2026, 22:1614,339-20
30 Aug 2026, 19:5414,359-20
29 Aug 2026, 22:4714,379-18
28 Aug 2026, 23:1314,397-7
28 Aug 2026, 01:0214,404-12
26 Aug 2026, 22:5514,416-7
25 Aug 2026, 21:1714,423-20
24 Aug 2026, 21:1414,443-32
23 Aug 2026, 10:0314,475-20
21 Aug 2026, 23:5614,495-16
20 Aug 2026, 17:1814,511-7
19 Aug 2026, 18:3814,518-16
18 Aug 2026, 21:0414,534-18
17 Aug 2026, 20:2614,552-19
16 Aug 2026, 22:0314,571first reading

Engagement

23 posts held, back to 19 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 51 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.09%
avg views ÷ 14,223 subscribers
Avg views / post
155
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.42%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 23 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 3 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 August 2026
Posts held23 (19 May 202627 August 2026)
Views total466
Reactions total2
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 18:49 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
42s
Average length
14s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

11 reactions across 8 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
654.5%
🔥545.5%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 19 May 2026 to 27 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

27 Aug 2026, 09:47 UTC112 viewsread 2 September 2026
Video

The energy transition needs tools that work in the real world. That is why 15+ energy communities already use the C4E Energy Platform for smarter management, balancing, and settlement processes. Find out how at: 👉 https://c4e.io/energy-communities

20 Aug 2026, 13:30 UTC141 views2 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

The next energy system will need more than automation. It will need transparent operating rules. C4E EnergyOS is designed with governance logic that can support decisions around energy tariffs and community operating rules with auditable on-chain records. This helps energy systems move toward coordination that is not only smarter, but also more accountable. 👉 https://c4e.io/

2

13 Aug 2026, 12:11 UTC213 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Energy communities need infrastructure they can actually operate on. Our Energy Platform helps communities, cooperatives, prosumers, and municipalities track, balance, and settle local energy flows with smart meter integration, transparent settlements, and intuitive dashboards. The platform supports lower energy costs and carbon footprint reduction by up to 40%, while bringing more clarity to local energy managemen

29 Jul 2026, 14:23 UTC265 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Energy innovation cannot depend on isolated tools. The next generation of energy infrastructure needs modular systems that can work independently, but also connect through shared settlement, incentives, governance, and data flows. C4E is building a Web3-native energy stack where EnergyOS, AIMAS, DeTrack, and blockchain infrastructure operate as part of one connected ecosystem. This is how real-world energy process

24 Jul 2026, 11:19 UTC266 viewsread 2 September 2026

China plans to increase wind and solar generation by 50%+ over the next five years, with its green power target binding for the first time. At C4E, we see this as a strong signal that renewables are becoming a pillar of energy security. More here: https://www.thenews.com.pk/latest/1410019-china-targets-50-growth-in-wind-and-solar-power-generation-by-2030

20 Jul 2026, 10:16 UTC255 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

The next energy system will need more than smart devices. It will need trusted device identity. At C4E we are building toward this through DePIN infrastructure, machine identity, verifiable telemetry, and auditable real-world energy records. This helps make connected energy assets verifiable, traceable, and ready for smarter digital operations. 👉 https://c4e.io/

16 Jul 2026, 11:58 UTC250 viewsread 2 September 2026

The EU plans to raise energy storage capacity from 55 GW today to 200 GW by 2030. At C4E, we champion developments that put more renewable power to work. Learn more here: https://www.euronews.com/my-europe/2026/07/16/what-is-the-eus-plan-to-triple-energy-storage-as-renewable-power-goes-to-waste

10 Jul 2026, 14:29 UTC322 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Energy systems cannot stay reactive forever. As more assets, meters, and distributed infrastructure come online, operators need better visibility into what is happening now and what may happen next. C4E is building infrastructure that helps turn real-world energy data into smarter forecasting, better decisions, and more reliable energy operations. The future of energy will not only be connected. It will be predicti

8 Jul 2026, 06:03 UTC230 viewsread 2 September 2026
Video

The energy transition needs tools that work in the real world. That is why 15+ energy communities already use the C4E Energy Platform for smarter management, balancing, and settlement processes. Find out how at: 👉https//c4e.io/energy-communities

29 Jun 2026, 07:28 UTC214 views1 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Turkey’s renewables reached 72.3% of power generation in May, a 26 year high. Coal fell to 17%, a 22 year low. At C4E, we are watching these signals of energy transition accelerating. More here: https://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/renewable-share-in-power-generation-hits-26-year-high-223762

1

25 Jun 2026, 16:26 UTC196 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Energy systems are becoming more complex, and reliability is becoming harder to maintain. The next generation of infrastructure needs to support local flexibility, better visibility, and faster response when conditions change. C4E is building tools that help energy networks become more adaptive, transparent, and resilient in a changing energy landscape. Because the future of energy should not only be cleaner, but

23 Jun 2026, 10:08 UTC204 viewsread 2 September 2026

The energy sector doesn’t just need more data. It needs systems that can talk, verify and act together. The next bottleneck is interoperability, and at C4E we are building solutions to address it. Read more in our latest article: https://medium.com/chain4-energy/the-next-energy-bottleneck-is-not-data-2b9921ffbb6b

Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @c4e_announcements. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

AirdropsGun™
@AirdropsGun · 43,050
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 25 August 2026
Edu3Labs Updates
@edu3labsupdates · 106,190
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 18 August 2026
Galaxy Lab
@galaxylabofficial · 51,094
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 24 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“C4E Announcements” (@c4e_announcements), 14,223 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/c4e_announcements.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.