Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 80% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
31 measurements spanning 42 days, net -288. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 19,006–19,380 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 31
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 05:00
19,049
-22
15 Sept 2026, 23:21
19,071
-2
14 Sept 2026, 04:59
19,073
-27
12 Sept 2026, 12:59
19,100
-21
10 Sept 2026, 08:42
19,121
-29
7 Sept 2026, 02:39
19,150
-28
4 Sept 2026, 10:38
19,178
-6
2 Sept 2026, 19:48
19,184
-8
1 Sept 2026, 20:08
19,192
-7
31 Aug 2026, 23:17
19,199
-3
30 Aug 2026, 23:36
19,202
-4
30 Aug 2026, 00:43
19,206
-8
28 Aug 2026, 23:59
19,214
-3
28 Aug 2026, 00:24
19,217
-1
27 Aug 2026, 02:12
19,218
-2
26 Aug 2026, 02:34
19,220
-2
25 Aug 2026, 01:43
19,222
-16
23 Aug 2026, 11:58
19,238
-15
21 Aug 2026, 19:08
19,253
-13
20 Aug 2026, 15:11
19,266
first reading
Engagement
22 posts held, back to 27 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
3.37%
avg views ÷ 19,049 subscribers
Avg views / post
641
1 post measured
Reaction rate
1.40%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 22 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 August 2026
Posts held
22 (27 March 2026 – 26 August 2026)
Views total
641
Reactions total
9
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 01:19 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
239 reactions across 22 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
160
66.9%
❤
37
15.5%
👏
34
14.2%
🐳
2
0.837%
💯
2
0.837%
🥰
2
0.837%
👎
1
0.418%
🔥
1
0.418%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 239 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 27 March 2026 to 26 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
📣 DEX market share surged from ~15% in 2022 to 42%+ in 2026.
🏦 BlackRock, JPMorgan, and Franklin Templeton are bringing real-world assets on-chain.
TradFi has arrived. AMM-era DEXs weren’t built for this.
The infrastructure standard has changed.
#LocusChain #DeFi #DEX #RWA
📌 Official Link
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
🌐Website 🐦Twitter ✈️Channel ✈️Group
⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
📣 Global payments need a blockchain built to scale.
Locus Chain
🔘 Dynamic Sharding + DAG parallel processing for massive scalability
🔘Verifiable Pruning for integrity
🔘Fully P2P + Stateless Nodes, decentralized by design
📌 Official Link
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
🌐Website 🐦Twitter ✈️Channel ✈️Group
⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
📣 The GENIUS Act AML comment period closed on June 9.
💳 Visa, Mastercard, PayPal, and Stripe are embracing stablecoin payments.
⛓️ Blockchain is becoming the settlement layer for global finance.
The question is:
Which blockchain can truly scale?
#LocusChain #GENIUS #Stablecoin
📌 Official Link
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
🌐Website 🐦Twitter ✈️Channel ✈️Group
7월 25일에 열렸던 오프라인 로커스/크레타 행사 영상 모두 올려드렸고, 링크는 다음과 같습니다.
관심있게 한번씩 봐주시면 좋겠습니다.
감사합니다.
1부영상
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d8rVy20RD-A
2부영상
https://youtu.be/Fytghmmq1TY
안내드립니다.
토요일날 오프라인 행사를 통해 그간 개발된 LDEX, 미디어체인, 크레타 플랫폼(슈퍼클럽/지갑/마켓플레이스 등), 킹덤언더파이어 더라이즈 등 시연해보이고, 이대표님께서 런칭일정과 사업현황에 대해 상세 설명하셨습니다.
로커스 메인넷과 LDEX 연내 런칭을 포함해 크레타 서비스 일정도 약속했습니다.
우선 영상 공유는 편집이 되는 버전부터 나누어 내일 올려드리겠습니다.
그리고, 가격 관련해 문의가 많은데, 무슨 악재가 있는 것은 전혀 아닙니다.
기존에 일정에 대한 루머도 많고 해서 힘드셨겠지만 메인넷 및 다양한 기술과 플랫폼의 개발과 국내외 기업들과의 협업 진행은 잘 진행되고 있습니다.
최선을 다해 꼭 발표한 개발 일정들이 준수되고 사업 성과도 결실을 맷도록 해서 다같이 웃는 날이 오도록 하겠습니다.
감사합니다.
📌 Offic…
⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
📣 Take a first look at LDEX.
Here's a preview of LDEX, our decentralized trading platform powered by Locus Chain.
🎥 https://t.co/fHFmKfZ0lR
#LDEX #LocusChain #DEX #Web3
📌 Official Link
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
🌐Website 🐦Twitter ✈️Channel ✈️Group
⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
📣 Bitcoin Layer 2s keep launching
Most won't survive.
The market isn't asking for higher TPS on paper.
It's asking for real-time payments, gaming, and IoT
Without real demand, higher throughput is just another metric.
Infrastructure only matters when people actually use it.
#LocusChain #Web3 #Layer1 #TPS
📌 Official Link
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
🌐Website 🐦Twitter ✈️Channel ✈️Group
⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
📣 Bridges get hacked because they centralize trust.
Locus Chain is different.
☄️Fully P2P: no central relay to attack.
☄️Dynamic Sharding: traffic is distributed automatically.
☄️Verifiable Pruning: data integrity is preserved.
No single point of failure(SPOF)
No central point to attack.
#LocusChain #Layer1 #Blockchain #SPOF #P2P
📌 Official Link
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
🌐Website 🐦Twitter ✈️Channel ✈️Group
⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
📣 Building a fast blockchain is not the goal.
It’s unlocking what was once blocked by slow blockchain speeds.
The reality Locus Chain is building.
#LocusChain #Blockchain #TPS #Speed
📌 Official Link
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
🌐Website 🐦Twitter ✈️Channel ✈️Group
⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
📣 Locus Chain Testnet V2 Notice
Locus Testnet V2 will be rebooted to improve stability and performance.
🕒 Reboot Schedule
June 26, 2026, 16:00 PM (KST)
As part of this process, all data will be reset, including NFTs and tokens from the previous test phase.
Following the network reset, all participants must update their node and wallet, and create a new account to continue testing.
Thank you for your un…
⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
📣🚨 $250M+ lost to bridge hacks in 2026.
⚠️ 14+ major incidents.
The same root cause, every time.
It's not a bug, it's the centralized trust model itself.
One bridge. One relay node.
🎯 That’s a Single Point of Failure (SPOF).
‼️ Want to learn more?
#Bridge_hack #Web3 #Security #Blockchain
📌 Official Link
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
🌐Website 🐦Twitter ✈️Channel ✈️Group
👍7🐳1
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @locusofficial. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@locusofficial edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
26 August 2026
Most recent edit
26 August 2026
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Creta_official @Creta_world_official · 27,076 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 19 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“LOCUS CHAIN Official” (@locusofficial), 19,049 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/locusofficial.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.