🔥汪涵源头号铺 🔥全球「Tdata&Session&Json」 🔥TG协议号 直登号 新老号 🔥代开会员 飞机会员 购买星星 🔥24小时全自动机器人 🔥认准🆔 @whhpbot 🔥认准🆔 @whhpbot 🔥认准🆔 @whhpbot 🔥精养号码低至0.2U 🔥会员3个月仅需13U 🔥支持OKPAY充值
👍13🔥11🥰7❤🔥6🤩6❤5😍4🎉2

Channel
@cd333
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
27,073subscribers
+6,012 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001821483324 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @acg11 @cd333 |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 21 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 90 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 21 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cd333 |
Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 21 Oct 2026, 09:06 | 27,073 | +31 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 16:54 | 27,042 | +14 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 10:00 | 27,028 | +37 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 14:18 | 26,991 | +6 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 10:40 | 26,985 | +31 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 15:57 | 26,954 | +13 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 08:59 | 26,941 | +37 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 18:47 | 26,904 | +54 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 10:28 | 26,850 | +50 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 21:00 | 26,800 | +36 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 13:26 | 26,764 | +88 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 17:28 | 26,676 | +30 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 09:59 | 26,646 | +56 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 15:16 | 26,590 | +29 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 12:20 | 26,561 | +89 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 05:57 | 26,472 | +17 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 23:30 | 26,455 | +168 |
| 9 Oct 2026, 00:57 | 26,287 | +2 |
| 8 Oct 2026, 15:17 | 26,285 | +288 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 16:38 | 25,997 | first reading |
626 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 134 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 288 of 292 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 626 (7 August 2026 – 21 October 2026) |
| Views total | 52,699 |
| Reactions total | 7,549 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 21 Oct 2026, 06:05 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 362 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
14,598 reactions across 597 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 2,674 | 18.3% | |
| 💯 | 1,523 | 10.4% | |
| 😍 | 1,511 | 10.4% | |
| 🥰 | 1,502 | 10.3% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1,497 | 10.3% | |
| 🔥 | 1,474 | 10.1% | |
| ❤ | 1,468 | 10.1% | |
| 🤩 | 1,434 | 9.82% | |
| 🎉 | 1,402 | 9.60% | |
| 🕊 | 54 | 0.37% | |
| 🤮 | 27 | 0.185% | |
| 😡 | 26 | 0.178% | |
| 😭 | 4 | 0.027% | |
| 😨 | 1 | 0.007% | |
| 🤬 | 1 | 0.007% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 597 of the 626 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 14,598 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 626 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 21 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.
Measured over the 626 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 21 October 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
🔥汪涵源头号铺 🔥全球「Tdata&Session&Json」 🔥TG协议号 直登号 新老号 🔥代开会员 飞机会员 购买星星 🔥24小时全自动机器人 🔥认准🆔 @whhpbot 🔥认准🆔 @whhpbot 🔥认准🆔 @whhpbot 🔥精养号码低至0.2U 🔥会员3个月仅需13U 🔥支持OKPAY充值
👍13🔥11🥰7❤🔥6🤩6❤5😍4🎉2
😤路虎推荐平台😤国际知名品牌😤 😤😤😤😤 😤😤😤😤 ▶️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡ ️欲戴皇冠 必承其重 ▶️😆😄😀😉🥲 全网福利天花板 【七天担保直营】👍 ▶️ 🟢 点击进入 JVIP 即刻入场 · 开启巅峰时刻 ‼️ ▶️ 🧐皇冠综合台-皇冠担保 官方直营 直达入口
🎉7👍4😍4🔥3🥰3💯2❤1❤🔥1
🎉携手七天担保公示1200万U地址地址余额随时可查!为您全程保驾护航,欢迎广大玩家前往监督 📱📱📱📱📱📱📱📱📱📱 #东南亚盘总共同选择的综合U币娱乐平台,集团储备资金上亿 #七天娱乐城 全网福利天花板😀 😀新会员首存领取8888红利!二存三存还能再领取5888红利! 😀满7天/10天/30天,投注最高领取6888豪华礼包! 😀 新人注册满七天符合条件可在领取一份体验金 点击下方机器人即可完成注册 🎇飞投机器人:@qitian 🌐官方网址: qt718.com 😁🥹😁😌😌🥲😌🤣😚😌😋🥲😚😚😋😍
👍10🎉4💯4❤🔥3🔥3❤2🤩2🥰1
🧐皇冠博彩-皇冠担保 官方直营 😂公平 公正 公开 安全有保障。 😂多渠道玩法 多重福利 体验不一样刺激 😂充提秒到 大额无忧 用的放心 玩的安心。 🔗皇冠娱乐综合盘网址: 6i.com 🤖皇冠综合盘机器人: @i6bot
👍6❤🔥4🎉4🔥3🥰3💯2❤1🤩1
#零元购 看便利店没人看守,偷东西!
🎉7👍7❤🔥3🤩3❤2🥰2💯1😍1
#亚洲马桶 女子第一次出国,看到外国小哥哥就犯花痴!
👍10❤🔥4🎉3😍3🔥2❤1💯1🤩1
阿尔巴尼亚,当地爆发的全国性抗议已经失控,部分城市已经演变为严重骚乱。
👍6❤4🎉4🔥4🥰3❤🔥2💯2😍1
2026年10月20日,乐山邦泰天著,垃圾变压工程漏电,男子在下面小便被电死!
👍8❤7🤩7❤🔥5🔥4🥰4😍4🎉3
20日, 一看就是弯岛党派人士,朝堂上吵架的姿态,一模一样。
👍5🎉4🤩4🥰4❤3🔥3😍2
#赵瑾一 #西绿 抖音最美女律师 西绿 & 赵瑾一 被证明律师证是p的,被网友戏称演戏把自己也演进去。 近日有更大爆料指出,西绿的搭档张宸铭,两人表面上在社交平台靠着cp炒作人设,实际上西绿被曝出早就是已婚状态,二人炒作cp也开始假戏真做。
👍6❤5❤🔥3🎉3🤩3🥰3💯1😍1
李宗瑞二代邹振豪 东莞富二代 #邹振豪 迷奸人数创下英国人数纪录 大量迷奸视频流出 中国东莞富二代留学生 #邹振豪 在英国涉嫌迷奸60人,长期使用 #小红书 #微信 猎艳!录了超1277段视频,创下英国史上最大性犯罪案件。
👍5❤🔥4🔥4🥰3🎉2💯2🤩2😍1
#黄骅 #河北周美静 河北周美静出轨被杀 她离婚了以后谈了个19岁的男的,然后又出轨了,这个19岁男的喝多了之后就把她杀了!
👍8🔥8❤7❤🔥6🎉6🤩3🥰2💯1
Showing the 12 most recent of 626 posts we hold for @cd333. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“SOSO吃瓜中心💎热搜/母狗/人妻” (@cd333), 27,073 subscribers as measured 21 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cd333.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.