Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
24 measurements spanning 92 days, net -66. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,654–6,740 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
7 Nov 2026, 09:10
6,664
-6
4 Nov 2026, 06:10
6,670
-3
1 Nov 2026, 04:08
6,673
-2
29 Oct 2026, 11:21
6,675
-6
26 Oct 2026, 12:27
6,681
-5
23 Oct 2026, 03:00
6,686
+4
20 Oct 2026, 05:28
6,682
-3
17 Oct 2026, 12:56
6,685
-1
14 Oct 2026, 17:31
6,686
+2
11 Oct 2026, 00:19
6,684
+2
4 Oct 2026, 19:18
6,682
-1
25 Sept 2026, 03:18
6,683
-14
15 Sept 2026, 00:20
6,697
-3
11 Sept 2026, 07:59
6,700
-5
6 Sept 2026, 08:59
6,705
-1
2 Sept 2026, 09:07
6,706
+2
30 Aug 2026, 03:54
6,704
-3
23 Aug 2026, 23:15
6,707
+2
20 Aug 2026, 15:57
6,705
+2
17 Aug 2026, 18:35
6,703
first reading
Engagement
39 posts held, back to 29 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
12.1%
avg views ÷ 6,664 subscribers
Avg views / post
808
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.544%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 39 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 10 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held
39 (29 June 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total
8,081
Reactions total
39
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Nov 2026, 01:56 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
5m 11s
Average length
5m 11s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
248 reactions across 34 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
156
62.9%
🔥
58
23.4%
👍
27
10.9%
🤩
3
1.21%
🥰
2
0.806%
👏
1
0.403%
🤝
1
0.403%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 35 of the 39 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 248 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 39 most recent posts we hold, published 29 June 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
48.7%
19 of 39 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
19
posts carrying an erid · 19 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
934
over 19 measured posts
Median views · rest
1,050
over 20 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
CQH36pWzJpwGd9wFJ5mjPQV8qwxA186sAjJan3VvbWHZYM
1
9 October 2026
9 October 2026
CQH36pWzJpwGd9wFJ9LggitkzNkixXd9sXoQYvYvr7HWmg
1
30 July 2026
30 July 2026
CQH36pWzJpwGd9wFLJnheWJ8ja9odtCgV9Qw5tiKdLJGD8
1
12 August 2026
12 August 2026
CQH36pWzJpwGd9wFQPABhpQMJQMYnqD2xjC1yJtcatMzn5
1
30 October 2026
30 October 2026
CQH36pWzJpwGd9wFRC5jzTMAnwMzRXbXFgnzcCQkH9L8aR
1
31 July 2026
31 July 2026
CQH36pWzJpwGd9wFSnNKd4nqQZQy2q4Lmeaar9qE4d7Ka1
1
27 October 2026
27 October 2026
CQH36pWzJpwGd9wFTvAzyUCxnyCD9pt6takRGYbGFUsgSZ
1
27 July 2026
27 July 2026
CQH36pWzJpwGd9wFUTHUWRLTLTfMSHzqR6qR3bSS8EjYaT
1
24 September 2026
24 September 2026
CQH36pWzJpwGd9wFX9BCiz7GbyQxE92o5T8ERnAnp19F1Y
1
26 October 2026
26 October 2026
CQH36pWzJpwGd9wFXRxAZFsdmXJK4YvecMXVVjE7zAJxxh
1
29 July 2026
29 July 2026
CQH36pWzJpwGd9wFZ2smqh9dnWB937DLSmXkydv5NYMeix
1
15 September 2026
15 September 2026
CQH36pWzJpwGd9wFZJcJTcv11nemh3J9ohbNDveb66hW41
1
9 July 2026
9 July 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it. 7 further tokens are held for this entry and not listed here.
Measured over the 39 most recent posts we hold, published 29 June 2026 to 5 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 10 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
😨Страх или фобия? Как разобраться психологу и помочь клиенту
Отличаете ли вы естественный страх от тревоги и фобии? Знаете ли, какие механизмы поддерживают избегание? Понимаете ли, когда привычных психологических инструментов уже недостаточно и важно обозначить границы своей компетентности?
Приглашаем проверить и расширить свои профессиональные знания на бесплатном вебинаре «Возможности работы психолога со страхами …
💥️️️️️️ Последняя конференция года — 16–17 декабря
Дорогие коллеги, приглашаем вас на нашу последнюю в этом году конференцию — «Интегративный подход в действии: системный взгляд и тактика работы с актуальными запросами».
Для нас интегративность — это умение видеть человека целостно — его запрос, историю, динамику отношений и ресурсы, — и способность гибко сочетать разные подходы там, где это действительно помогает …
⭐️ Бывает, что нужно быстро разобраться в теме. Или хочется собрать несколько материалов по одному направлению. А иногда понимаешь, что пора пройти полноценный курс и выстроить знания в систему.
На нашей осенней распродаже можно выбрать тот формат обучения, который нужен вам именно сейчас.
🔹️️ Если хотите познакомиться с одной темой
Выбирайте отдельный вебинар из каталога. Это хороший формат, чтобы разобраться в ко…
⭐️ До конца года остается еще два месяца — хороший момент для учебы, новых идей и профессионального роста. Поэтому мы приглашаем вас на осеннюю распродажу обучающих материалов!
🔥 С 27 по 29 октября в институте «Метафора» действуют специальные цены:
📍 комплекты вебинаров, курсы и конференции в записи со скидкой 50%,
📍 гайды и воркбуки с техниками со скидкой 60%,
📍 все вебинары каталога со скидкой 30%.
Все материалы…
🎓 8 докладов по КПТ — новые идеи и инструменты для вашей практики
Как за короткое время познакомиться с пятью направлениями КПТ, увидеть их применение на практике и найти новые решения для привычных профессиональных задач?
На прошедшей конференции «КПТ в работе психолога: методы, техники и практические инструменты» эксперты разбирали реальные клинические случаи, делились терапевтическими стратегиями и показывали, к…
🔥 Конференция по КПТ продолжается! Присоединяйтесь ко второму дню
Коллеги, сегодня ровно с 11:00 мск у нас второй день онлайн-конференции «КПТ в работе психолога: методы, техники и практические инструменты».
Несколько отзывов от участников о том, как было вчера:
💬 Прекрасный доклад, очень понравилась и сам лектор и ее презентация. Многое про АСТ стало понятнее!
💬 Очень классная подача, когда по ходу теоретической…
‼️ Ссылка на конференцию «КПТ в работе психолога: методы, техники и практические инструменты» уже на вашей почте ‼️
Коллеги, ссылка на первый день конференции уже отправлена вам на почту! Пожалуйста, убедитесь заранее, что вы ее получили 🙏
Если ссылка не пришла ⬇️
1. Проверьте все папки, включая «Входящие», «Спам», «Рассылки» и т.п., или попробуйте найти на почте по теме: Ссылка для первого дня конференции «КПТ в р…
КПТ — это не просто работа с мыслями и поведением. Это инструменты, которые помогают клиентам менять свою жизнь, а терапевтам — видеть путь к результату.
Когда клиент все понимает умом, но продолжает тревожиться, избегать действий или предъявлять к себе завышенные требования, как помочь ему выйти за пределы привычных сценариев? Как работать эффективно, в том числе в краткосрочной терапии?
Разберем уже завтра на кон…
📣 Уже через неделю — конференция по КПТ!
📅 21–22 октября, 11:00–18:30 мск
💻 Онлайн
🎁 Участие в эфирах бесплатное — нужна только регистрация
8 клинических кейсов, сложные терапевтические ситуации и практические решения от экспертов.
Что будем разбирать? 👇
🔹 Ирина Кузина — Тревога перед публичными выступлениями. Как с помощью ACT помочь клиентке вернуть свободу выбора в профессиональной и личной жизни?
🔹 Сергей Кра…
🎨 Как работать с Теневой частью клиента через арт-терапию? Попробуйте две техники на практике 14 октября
Коллеги, приглашаем вас 14 октября (среда) с 18:00 до 20:00 мск на практический семинар «Арт-терапия в работе с Тенью» с Верой Бутовой — клиническим психологом, арт-терапевтом, арт-коучем, преподавателем психологии и супервизором.
За два часа вы познакомитесь с двумя арт-терапевтическими техниками: «Цветок моей …
❓ Как концептуализация помогает увидеть клиентский случай целостно?
Клиент может рассказывать о тревоге, отношениях, детском опыте, конфликтах, усталости, сомнениях в себе. Все это звучит важно. Но у психолога возникает задача: не просто выслушать и собрать факты, а понять, как все это связано и что именно поддерживает проблему сейчас.
📚 В КПТ одним из инструментов для такой работы является концептуализация.
🔹 Кон…
💥 Напоминаем, что сегодня последний день, когда действуют скидки 50% на курсы и конференции в записи.
В этой подборке мы собрали обучающие программы со стоимостью до 4000 рублей. Что входит в покупку:
🔸 запись открывается сразу после оплаты;
🔸 доступ на 1 год;
🔸 презентации можно скачать;
🔸 сертификат участника в электронном виде.
Два онлайн-курса врача-психотерапевта, доктора психол. наук, профессора, основателя И…
❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 39 posts we hold for @centrmetafora. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Сообщество психологов @interviziya · 19,240 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 3 October 2026
Университет практической психологии Н.И. Козлова @univer_pp · 21,048 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 26 September 2026
Институт психологии Life Practic @psypractic_ru · 33,070 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 4 September 2026
Мария Штерн • МАК, психосоматика, тело @makMariaStern · 20,700 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 24 September 2026
Открытые курсы СПб ИДПО для психологов и психотерапевтов @spb_idpo · 27,518 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 10 September 2026
Библиотека психолога @psy_b00k · 21,898 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 22 September 2026
Начинающие психологи @new_psycholog · 19,371 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 2 October 2026
Анетта Орлова | Философия жизни @anettaorlova · 40,040 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 4 September 2026
Библиотека психология/ философия/ медицина @biblio_psychology · 19,820 Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 1 October 2026
Жизнь и тело с Оксаной @telo_psy · 22,374 Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 21 September 2026
Инпсихо | Медиа Московского Института Психоанализа @Inpsycho · 31,293 Telegram ranks this channel #92 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 6 September 2026
This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Институт «Метафора»” (@centrmetafora), 6,664 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/centrmetafora.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.