«А скрипты будут?» Будут! И не только они. К каждому занятию ты получаешь целый набор материалов: ○ Конспект – полная красивая теория по теме в формате pdf ○ Скрипт – конспект с пропусками, которые надо заполнять на вебе ○ Презентация – слайды, по которым идём на занятии (без практики) ○ Скрипт по презентации – слайды с пропусками, тот же скрипт, но немного в другом формате Можешь распечатать, что больше нравится,…

Channel
Юлиан Рыжов | Химия NeoFamily | ЕГЭ 2027
@chemfamily
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
27,701subscribers
-1,770 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001638737213 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @chemfamily |
| Description | Готовим к ЕГЭ по химии Годовой курс ЕГЭ-2027: https://neofamily.ru/shop/himiya-god Отзывы: @neofamilychem_reviews По всем вопросам: @neofamilyhelp ООО "НЕОФЭМИЛИ" |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 35 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/chemfamily |
Topic
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 05:40 | 27,701 | -124 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 09:41 | 27,825 | +130 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 12:19 | 27,695 | -31 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 20:19 | 27,726 | -68 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 05:56 | 27,794 | -38 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 20:39 | 27,832 | -127 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 15:19 | 27,959 | -92 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 08:15 | 28,051 | -38 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 19:52 | 28,089 | -96 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 17:56 | 28,185 | -75 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 20:13 | 28,260 | -84 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 22:58 | 28,344 | -63 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 00:27 | 28,407 | -50 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 02:38 | 28,457 | -47 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 05:04 | 28,504 | -47 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 08:16 | 28,551 | -55 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 09:37 | 28,606 | -39 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 13:04 | 28,645 | -4 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 11:28 | 28,649 | -93 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 20:34 | 28,742 | first reading |
Engagement
107 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 67 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 10.3%
- avg views ÷ 27,701 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2,860
- 45 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 1.65%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 45
- of 107 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 41 of 45 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 107 (30 July 2026 – 26 September 2026) |
| Views total | 128,556 |
| Reactions total | 1,981 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 27 Sept 2026, 07:49 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈3,050
- Videos
- ≈172
- Links
- ≈1,560
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 4m 25s
- Average length
- 22s
Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3,832 reactions across 103 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5354916382284730411 | 3,832 | 100.0% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 103 of the 107 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,832 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 107 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Одна из самых популярных ловушек во 2 линии Обрати внимание на свойства летучих водородных соединений 🤓
Уже нашёл ЕГЭ школу, купил курс, но вайб и формат — вообще не твоё? Это не проблема, переходи к нам со скидкой 1000 рублей Если тебе не понравилось в другой онлайн-школе, попробуй поучиться с нами — первый месяц будет дешевле! Просто используй кодовое слово АГЕНТ до 15 октября ☕ Получить скидку очень просто: → Пиши АГЕНТ сюда: @NeoFamilyHelp → Скидывай чек из другой школы, где покупал курс → Получай -1000₽ на Год…
custom 53549163822847304114
Очень (!) важные обновления Умного повторения ✋ • Максимальный интервал для карточки увеличен до 50 дней • Добавлена смешнявка после прохождения всех карточек (будет меняться каждый день) Всем спасибо за внимание 🌹
custom 535491638228473041137
Video, posted without a caption
custom 535491638228473041163
Треть занятий на курсе – это практикумы Зачем так много? Чтобы ты сделал все свои ошибки в течение года, а не на самом ЕГЭ На практикумах мы нарешиваем каждую линию и разбираемся: на каких терминах ловят, как искать ответ, на чём конкретно ты спотыкаешься Практикумы идут онлайн, поэтому они больше приближены к реальному ЕГЭ, чем домашка. Тебе нужно в моменте выдать ответ, загуглить не получится Остаётся только пр…
custom 535491638228473041129
Твоя шпаргалка по 2 линии 🙌
custom 535491638228473041156
У тебя ещё две недели, чтобы начать подготовку к химии: 30 сентября поднимаем цены на Годовой Годовой — это мой самый популярный курс, и не зря. Логика простая: 🔴Начнёшь готовиться раньше → будет больше времени 🔴Больше времени → больше практики 🔴Больше практики → больше баллов на ЕГЭ За 8 месяцев ты точно успеешь выучить егэшную химию и отработать все задания Общую химию мы уже начали, присоединяйся: https://neo…
custom 535491638228473041117
Сольватация, соли? Оказывается, solvo в переводе c латинского — растворять Не для ЕГЭ
custom 535491638228473041126
Video, posted without a caption
custom 5354916382284730411110
Ты ещё успеваешь записаться на Годовой → Абсолютно все вебинары с начала курса остались в записи → Все домашки доступны для выполнения → Куратор поможет как можно скорее догнать программу И главное: мы в самом начале пути. Потом догнать курс будет сложнее Начинай сейчас, преодолевай первые темы и готовься к химии в спокойном темпе За 8 месяцев мы успеем пройти всё для ЕГЭ (без ночного бота и 8-часовых марафонов) …
custom 535491638228473041125
Не пропускай первые темы – они самые важные Химию нужно изучать последовательно. Пока не разберёшься, как устроен атом, не сможешь понять степень окисления. Если не понял степень окисления, то как ты будешь решать ОВР? Огромное количество ошибок на ЕГЭ возникают из-за банальной недоученности общей химии Первые темы по химии обычно самые сложные и длинные, зато они: – Открывают дорогу к остальным разделам – Принос…
custom 53549163822847304112
Showing the 12 most recent of 107 posts we hold for @chemfamily. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@rufamily_ege · 19,423#1
@biofamily_ege · 86,854#2
@chemist_msu · 89,417#3
@noobiology · 41,480#4
@biowithbear · 53,947#5
@motivilyy · 9,815#6
@marklamarkdays · 69,949#7
@napolskaya_ege · 41,473#8
@noochem · 18,964#9
@stepenin10 · 8,978#10
@elena_shramuk · 5,493#11
@chem4you_ege · 17,069#12
@bio4you · 7,932#13
@max_bioum · 3,709#14
@chemistry_prep · 3,017#15
@chemkka · 3,146#16
@mulyamol · 998#17
@graeva_him · 87,051#18
@bioeshka · 6,290#19
@biology_ege_podgotovka · 6,380#20
@chemflamel · 4,683#21
@egehub_chem · 5,902#22
@egehub_bio · 13,197#23
@freedom_bio · 5,259#24
@mutagenege · 16,333#25
@webium_bio · 13,284#26
@noosekta · 1,833#27
@noouliana · 2,827#28
@dianassssss17 · 3,643#29
@heuristic_public · 8,812#30
@neofamily_ege · 1,792#31
@konspekty_ege · 93,288#32
@mestovivi · 1,628#33
@lcatherinee · 961#34
@nooasif · 11,876#35
@hydroliz · 6,242#36
@noomax · 2,359#37
@mariaapeksimova · 2,584#38
@kazanZkaya · 72,110#39
@biomarka · 4,077#40
@stepchem · 29,641#41
@margoshamedlove · 5,302#42
@kursbio · 17,995#43
@ochkova_chem · 3,928#44
@chembogdan · 38,880#45
@bio_obelets · 2,293#46
@youngteach · 3,617#47
@bio100ege · 11,776#48
@dm_chem · 2,477#49
@pozzdd_school · 5,430#50
@viva_natura · 340 (as read 10 September 2026)#51
@turbo_chem · 4,594#52
@ksenia_biokurs · 2,561#53
@saya88888888 · 234#54
@noorussk · 12,280#55
@biofakege · 2,505#56
@akimalu · 364#57
@noobiology10 · 5,561#58
@stanisIavskaya_oo · 5,165#59
@bios_v · 2,001#60
@off_yunyye_mediki · 5,873#61
@attraksjonnnnn · 7,331#62
@dashabiologichka · 1,284#63
@olimpiada_biology · 6,434#64
@pravdadirty · 1,395,339#65
@lesyamedd · 6,518#66
@donhvaa · 718#67
@kudlayoks · 10,875#68
@milaaaaaaaaaaaaaasha · 6,624#69
@postupaem_v_med · 1,581#70
@biopolis · 1,205#71
@maaargoooshaaaa · 11,038#72
@gv_bio · 450#73
@ege100_rus · 150,816#74
@diiiswinness · 2,606#75
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 10 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@biofamily_ege · 86,854
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 18 August 2026
@mathnewschool · 22,892
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 19 September 2026
@chembogdan · 38,880
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 30 August 2026
@graeva_him · 87,051
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 18 August 2026
@marklamarkdays · 69,949
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 21 August 2026
@chemist_msu · 89,417
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 18 August 2026
@napolskaya_ege · 41,473
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 30 August 2026
@konspekty_ege · 93,288
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 17 August 2026
@ChemistryEasy · 25,167
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 14 September 2026
@kazanZkaya · 72,110
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 20 August 2026
@chem_den · 97,430
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 18 August 2026
@biowithbear · 53,947
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 26 August 2026
@kruzhok_ns · 63,735
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 21 August 2026
@noobiology · 41,480
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 30 August 2026
@sasha_him · 49,928
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 26 August 2026
@medlci13 · 44,556
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 28 August 2026
@insperia_rus · 29,121
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 8 September 2026
@bio_boom · 40,093
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 31 August 2026
@vera_egeflex · 75,348
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 22 August 2026
@egeoge100ballov · 28,794
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 8 September 2026
This channel appears in 20 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Юлиан Рыжов | Химия NeoFamily | ЕГЭ 2027” (@chemfamily), 27,701 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chemfamily.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.