🔥 №1 по подготовке стобалльников среди соло преподов в РФ — 174 сотки 🔥
3200+ учеников за 2 года сдали на 80+
Средний балл активного ученика — 86,7
Записаться на курсы: https://clck.ru/3NfGuT
Перечень РКН: https://clck.ru/3FTLp7
Created
Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
22 measurements spanning 22 days, net +1,300. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 62,166–63,856 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 22
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
29 Aug 2026, 11:37
63,661
+121
28 Aug 2026, 12:12
63,540
+39
27 Aug 2026, 12:16
63,501
+18
26 Aug 2026, 13:33
63,483
-3
25 Aug 2026, 10:29
63,486
+3
24 Aug 2026, 12:55
63,483
+86
22 Aug 2026, 19:23
63,397
+82
21 Aug 2026, 06:28
63,315
-16
20 Aug 2026, 06:36
63,331
+100
19 Aug 2026, 08:37
63,231
+4
18 Aug 2026, 10:43
63,227
-1
17 Aug 2026, 13:17
63,228
+94
16 Aug 2026, 06:08
63,134
+110
14 Aug 2026, 20:06
63,024
+108
13 Aug 2026, 12:47
62,916
+146
12 Aug 2026, 11:45
62,770
+61
11 Aug 2026, 10:16
62,709
+81
10 Aug 2026, 10:21
62,628
+87
9 Aug 2026, 09:11
62,541
+112
8 Aug 2026, 07:23
62,429
first reading
Engagement
198 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 48 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
6.53%
avg views ÷ 63,661 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,160
198 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.03%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
198
of 198 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026
Posts held
198 (6 August 2026 – 29 August 2026)
Views total
823,600
Reactions total
24,961
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
29 Aug 2026, 14:05 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈5,430
Videos
≈521
Links
≈1,750
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
11m 13s
Average length
37s
Measured directly from 18 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
24,961 reactions across 198 posts, in 26 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
12,644
50.7%
🍌
4,473
17.9%
🔥
1,733
6.94%
👍
1,477
5.92%
💯
1,121
4.49%
🕊
799
3.20%
😭
593
2.38%
🥰
494
1.98%
🙏
291
1.17%
😁
204
0.817%
🗿
186
0.745%
😍
186
0.745%
😱
144
0.577%
⚡
104
0.417%
🤩
91
0.365%
👎
76
0.304%
😢
70
0.28%
🌚
60
0.24%
💅
49
0.196%
🐳
40
0.16%
6 further kinds
126
0.505%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 198 of the 198 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 24,961reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 198 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 29 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
21
across the posts below
Posts paid on
13
of 198 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @marklamarkdays. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 198 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 August 2026 to 29 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Чатик, подробнее про скидку выше
Если вы уже учитесь у Кати или на любом другом курсе в 100Б, у вас есть крутейшая возможность забрать ЛаМарк со скидкой 15% 🙏
Тут все просто, заходите в личный кабинет, закидываете курс в корзину, вводите промокод БЕРУБИО и радуетесь жизни
Очень важно вводить именно именно в личном кабинете, просто на сайте не получится
Всем химикам привет от Кати, а я пошел записывать вам контент…
⚡️⚡️ ЛЕГЕНДАРНЫЙ ДЕСЯТИЧАСОВОЙ СТРИМ УЖЕ ЗАВТРА В 10:00
Завтра, в 10:00 вместе с не менее легендарным Федосом начнем десятичасовой стрим, где разберем ВСЮ биологию с нуля и до уровня ЕГЭ
Всего за один день вы изучите все, чтобы сдать первый пробник уже на 50-60 баллов
Стрим нужен ВСЕМ, друзья, так что жду завтра примерно 65 тысяч человек онлайна. Договорились?
На стриме проведу целых три розыгрыша:
• 20 сертифика…
ЕГЭ 2027 СТАЛО СЛОЖНЕЕ? Теперь количество стобалльников точно упадет
Ну все, похайпились, и хватит 😁
На биологии действительно произошли изменения. Да, в сторону усложнения, но это все еще не означает то, сдать биологию станет невозможно.
Если кратко:
• в 11 задании — новые форматы
• 21 задание — теперь 1 балл вместо 2 баллов
• 22 задание — новый вопрос
• 26 задание — новый вопрос
• 27 задание — новый тип
ФИП…
⚡️РАЗБОР ДЕМОВЕРСИИ ЕГЭ
Чат, наконец-то! Дождались демку и все остальные важные файлы от ФИПИ. Сегодня разбираем вариант и смотрим, появилось ли что-то новое
Через 5 минут жду тут:
📺 ЮТ
💙 ВК
⚡️⚡️⚡️НАКОНЕЦ-ТО ДОЖДАЛИСЬ. ФИПИ ВЫЛОЖИЛИ ДЕМОВЕРСИЮ ЕГЭ 2027
А вместе с ней и обновленный кодификатор и спецификатор, в которых содержится ВСЯ инфа о том, как сдать ЕГЭ на 90+
Делаем разбор?
Марк Ламарк | Биология ЕГЭ | 100балльный Репетитор
Рохлов обманул на тыщу бананов 65 тысяч моих подписчиков
Я ему этого не прощу
❤156🍌61🥰13💔8😭7😱3👍2🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 198 posts we hold for @marklamarkdays. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 198 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 29 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 134,520 of 1,625,954entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Екатерина Строганова | Химия ЕГЭ | 100балльный репетитор @chemist_msu · 84,306#1
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 21 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Екатерина Строганова | Химия ЕГЭ | 100балльный репетитор @chemist_msu · 84,306 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 18 August 2026
NeoFamily | Биология ЕГЭ-2027 | Андрей и Нурлан @biofamily_ege · 84,279 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 18 August 2026
Жанна Казанская | Биология ЕГЭ 2027 Умскул | Канал еЖанчиков @kazanZkaya · 71,055 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 20 August 2026
Математика с Ильичом | ЕГЭ проф мат | 100балльный репетитор @ilchegg · 163,284 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 12 August 2026
Конспекты | Биология и Химия @konspekty_ege · 93,357 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 17 August 2026
Федос Кокос | Биология ОГЭ и ЕГЭ | 100балльный репетитор @fedos_kokos_100b · 42,325 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 29 August 2026
Марина Медведева | Биология ЕГЭ | 100балльный репетитор @biowithbear · 47,474 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 26 August 2026
Записки юного Вовчика @medlci13 · 44,297 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 28 August 2026
Никита Павлов | ОГЭ биология 2027 | Биобезобразие с Никитой | Умскул @BioBezobrazieoge · 85,881 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 18 August 2026
Маша Птипца | Русский язык ЕГЭ | 100балльный🔥 @ege100_rus · 130,251 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 13 August 2026
100балльный репетитор | Онлайн-школа ЕГЭ и ОГЭ @stopointerschool · 44,209 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 28 August 2026
Азат Адеев | Физика ОГЭ и ЕГЭ | 100балльный репетитор @fizikaoge · 69,746 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 20 August 2026
МатемАня | Математика ЕГЭ | 100балльный репетитор | Мать наук @matemanya · 41,827 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 29 August 2026
Елена Зеленская | Биология ОГЭ 2027 Умскул | Биология нас связала @bio_team · 54,142 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 24 August 2026
Татьяна Граева | Химия ЕГЭ 2027 (10 и 11 класс) | Умскул @graeva_him · 82,411 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 18 August 2026
Жизнь обычного Чудища @yourbeastyslife · 59,793 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 24 August 2026
Русский язык с Верой Flex | 100балльный репетитор @vera_egeflex · 61,963 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 22 August 2026
Валентиныч | Обществознание ЕГЭ | 100балльный репетитор @valentinitch · 57,331 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 23 August 2026
Денис Марков | Химия ОГЭ 2027 | Умскул @chem_den · 90,694 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 18 August 2026
Настя Коржева | Обществознание ЕГЭ и ОГЭ | 100балльный репетитор @socegeanastasia · 56,460 Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 23 August 2026
Александра Лебедева | Химия ОГЭ 2027 | Между нами химия | Умскул @sasha_him · 48,404 Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 26 August 2026
Новая Школа ЕГЭ | Кружок @kruzhok_ns · 65,884 Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 21 August 2026
Александр Долгих | Русский ЕГЭ 2027 | Грамотным быть модно | Умскул @dolgih_umrus · 165,432 Telegram ranks this channel #87 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 12 August 2026
Таня Коваль. ЕГЭ по русскому языку @TatiashkaEGE · 50,540 Telegram ranks this channel #91 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 25 August 2026
This channel appears in 24 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Марк Ламарк | Биология ЕГЭ | 100балльный Репетитор” (@marklamarkdays), 63,661 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/marklamarkdays.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.