Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Чешем Эго: гемблинг, seo, сайты, жизнь

Channel

Чешем Эго: гемблинг, seo, сайты, жизнь

@cheshemego

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

2,653subscribers

+32 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001276884325
TypeChannel
Username@cheshemego
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/cheshemego

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 31% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2,6212,6532,6376 August 2026 — 2,621 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,621 subscribers9 August 2026 — 2,623 subscribers12 August 2026 — 2,628 subscribers15 August 2026 — 2,631 subscribers19 August 2026 — 2,633 subscribers26 August 2026 — 2,638 subscribers29 August 2026 — 2,641 subscribers31 August 2026 — 2,642 subscribers4 September 2026 — 2,649 subscribers9 September 2026 — 2,651 subscribers13 September 2026 — 2,647 subscribers17 September 2026 — 2,653 subscribers6 August 202617 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 42 days, net +32. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,616–2,658 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 12:592,653+6
13 Sept 2026, 09:012,647-4
9 Sept 2026, 16:562,651+2
4 Sept 2026, 11:542,649+7
31 Aug 2026, 22:382,642+1
29 Aug 2026, 04:122,641+3
26 Aug 2026, 02:242,638+5
19 Aug 2026, 00:452,633+2
15 Aug 2026, 18:022,631+3
12 Aug 2026, 16:042,628+5
9 Aug 2026, 21:522,623+2
6 Aug 2026, 13:072,621no change
6 Aug 2026, 12:062,621first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 29 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

421 reactions across 20 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍10524.9%
😁9622.8%
🔥8720.7%
6114.5%
💯419.74%
👏163.80%
🤔92.14%
🤯40.95%
😱10.238%
🤩10.238%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 421 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 December 2025 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
17
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 20 we hold a reading for · 35%
Most on one post
9
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @cheshemego. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 December 2025 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 06:50 UTC381 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Второе. Дисперсия (продолжение выше) Второй подход — это не только более высокий доллар-час. Это ещё и намного более высокая дисперсия. Банкролл-менеджмент в покере существует именно поэтому: у агрессивного регуляра на большом объёме бывают даунстрики на сотни тысяч рук, и он не разоряется только потому, что у него хватает запаса их пересидеть. В SEO то же самое. Серия неудачных запусков подряд — не аномалия, а но

🔥8👍64

Signed Vitaliy Orlov

5 Aug 2026, 08:07 UTC486 views32 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Доллар-час в SEO До SEO я несколько лет провёл в покере — играл сам и руководил покерным проектом (Cardmates, привет!). Оттуда я вынес метрику, которую осознанно не применял, но где-то в бессознательном она крутилась постоянно! Сначала контекст. В покере есть понятие GTO — game theory optimal. Это не «оптимальная игра против оппонента», как часто думают, а почти наоборот: невзламываемая стратегия равновесия, котор

👍18🔥94😁1

Signed Vitaliy Orlov

31 Jul 2026, 15:53 UTC835 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Только что побегал и во время пробежки было 2 интересные встречи. Первая - с Максом (оказывается тут Максы тоже в почете), поляком, поговорили о беге и разном, готовится к айронмену, папа сеошкой занимается, разговорчивый. Вторая - с кабаном, поляком, неразговорчивый. Но лучший мотиватор бегать быстро)

😁17🤔1

Signed Vitaliy Orlov

16 Jul 2026, 07:11 UTC≈1,410 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Полиграф в Seo в компаниях: норм или стрём?

  1. Норм17%
  2. Стрём55%
  3. Глянуть результаты28%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

😁3

Signed Vitaliy Orlov

15 Jul 2026, 06:44 UTC≈1,250 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Полиграф в seo компаниях Уже не первый раз слышу, что сеошная компания внедрила в свои процессы найма пресловутый полиграф. Для меня эти новости были удивлением, так как мой мозг почему-то думал, что ну мы-то, в смысле сео индустрия, до этого не докатимся. Но что сейчас наша индустрия? Если говорить про гемблинг, то это уже такая же “темка”, как фейсбук — надо побыстрее найти связку, удержать и масштабировать. Важн

😁9👏2🤔1

Signed Vitaliy Orlov

8 Jul 2026, 08:02 UTC≈1,270 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Пробежал второй марафон Как и первый марафон этот тоже был ночным и тоже был тяжелым. Следующий всё-таки хочется наконец-то пробежать утром и не пытаться заснуть ночью из-за усталости. Ко второму марафону я подходил в лучшей форме, чем в прошлом году: я делал больше силовых тренировок, подключил тренировки в лесопарковой зоне, чтобы тело чуть лучше было готово бегать по такой поверхности, провел больше долгих трени

🔥11👍4👏32

Signed cheshimego

26 Jun 2026, 05:29 UTC≈1,260 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Человек-душа — есть и такие люди в компании Вы знаете даже такого: он заходит в офис, а у вас на лице уже появляется непроизвольная улыбка, как-то становится теплее, и как будто бы заботы на миг забываются. Такой человек, как клей, связывает людей, придает им какой-то дополнительный смысл, иногда поддержку, иногда заряд энергии. И не всегда он занимает руководящую должность. Это может быть обычный работяга, может б

💯154👏2

Signed Vitaliy Orlov

18 Jun 2026, 13:02 UTC≈1,300 views27 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Пост-рефлексии-фиксации Всё бурлит и порой не успеваю всё осмыслить, а блог, к счастью, порой служит хорошим поводом остановиться, собрать все мысли, даже кажущиеся разрозненными и посмотреть на них под другим углом. 1. Поговорка говорит, что век надо учиться, поэтому купил курс СОО, и активно продолжаю налаживать коммуникацию с разными людьми. Недавно нашел одно девушку в чате менеджеров от Бородатюка. Она настоль

👍137🔥7

Signed Vitaliy Orlov

15 May 2026, 09:16 UTC≈1,650 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Метрики менеджера Когда я раньше занимался шашками, то часто решал задачки в уме без доски. В этом был свой интерес, не заглядывая в ответы, представлять в голове ход событий и находить решение. Иногда это же я пытаюсь делать и с менеджерскими задачами. На одном из последних коллов мы обсуждали идею о том, как не по ощущениям, а по метрикам понимать хороший ли менеджер или нет. Еще и нужно учитывать, что у нас сеош

🤔5👍31

Signed Vitaliy Orlov

11 May 2026, 11:27 UTC≈1,640 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Буду на этом митапе https://seo-chill-meetup.com/ С радостью поболтаю про сеошку, процессы и команды. Состав похоже будет интересным!

9👍6🔥1🤯1

Signed Vitaliy Orlov

7 May 2026, 06:03 UTC≈1,770 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Пока последние месяцы были насыщенными работой и большими бытовыми вопросами, я продолжал подготовку к марафону. По моей “традиции” я как обычно перетренировался и решил скипнуть апрельский марафон, и бежать такой же ночной марафон, как в прошлому году. Но чтобы процесс подготовки был более эффективен, я снова решил сходить в спорт клинику для актуализации своих пульсовых зон, vo2max и других показателей. В прошлый

👍108🤯1

Signed Vitaliy Orlov

17 Apr 2026, 05:56 UTC≈2,680 views29 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

DMCA как теория игр Есть несколько команд в выдаче Google, все стоят в топе, получают трафик, работают. У каждого есть выбор: — заниматься SEO — или нажать грязную кнопку: отправить DMCA-абузу на конкурента. Google часто разбирается формально. Жалоба прилетела — страница улетела. Что получает тот, кто нажал кнопку первым? Краткосрочный плюс в виде просадки конкурента. Красиво? Только первые 5 минут, потому что д

💯1411😁3🤔1

Signed Vitaliy Orlov

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @cheshemego. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

16 Jul 2026, 07:11 UTCAnonymous Poll326 voters

Полиграф в Seo в компаниях: норм или стрём?

  1. Норм17%
  2. Стрём55%
  3. Глянуть результаты28%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 December 2025 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

R2B.News
@reg2bet · 25,043
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 15 September 2026
SEO HR, digital-вакансии, офис и удалёнка
@seohr · 24,935
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 15 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Чешем Эго: гемблинг, seo, сайты, жизнь” (@cheshemego), 2,653 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cheshemego.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.