Posted without readable text
custom 545838243650315868522custom 527199522681733881314custom 545838527547654176411custom 54588364832658223501

Channel
@chesnok
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry
6,596subscribers
+1,303 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002263127272 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @chesnok @tonchesnok |
| Description | Острый язык. Холодный кошелёк. Расследования, интервью и разборы про TON, крипту и Telegram. 🎙 Интервью: t.me/chesnok/886 💬 Чат: @chesnokton По найму: реклама, разборы, доносы, спецоперации — @TitanVibe @brobro · TON/USDT ☎️ Анонимно: @chesnok911bot |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 50 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/chesnok |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 67% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Nov 2026, 13:59 | 6,596 | no change |
| 3 Nov 2026, 23:06 | 6,596 | +23 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 17:28 | 6,573 | no change |
| 31 Oct 2026, 20:57 | 6,573 | +31 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 12:05 | 6,542 | -1 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 04:07 | 6,543 | +1 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 23:49 | 6,542 | +7 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 10:09 | 6,535 | +8 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 20:06 | 6,527 | +57 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 01:11 | 6,470 | +4 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 22:40 | 6,466 | +41 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 11:45 | 6,425 | -2 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 09:11 | 6,427 | +40 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 12:19 | 6,387 | +2 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 05:38 | 6,385 | +19 |
| 11 Oct 2026, 01:58 | 6,366 | +3 |
| 10 Oct 2026, 15:00 | 6,363 | +30 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 06:18 | 6,333 | +33 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 16:56 | 6,300 | +56 |
| 27 Sept 2026, 03:21 | 6,244 | first reading |
56 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 14 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 56 (22 July 2026 – 5 November 2026) |
| Views total | 133,140 |
| Reactions total | 2,400 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Nov 2026, 01:11 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
4,912 reactions across 55 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5271995226817338813 | 1,740 | 35.4% | |
| custom 5458385275476541764 | 1,224 | 24.9% | |
| custom 5458836483265822350 | 1,174 | 23.9% | |
| custom 5458382436503158685 | 562 | 11.4% | |
| custom 5456628934500188645 | 97 | 1.97% | |
| custom 5458613797801461578 | 73 | 1.49% | |
| custom 5456550091785534780 | 35 | 0.713% | |
| custom 5458627129379945505 | 7 | 0.143% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 55 of the 56 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,912 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 56 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @chesnok. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 56 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 July 2026 to 5 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 5 of 29 posts held from the last 30 days (17.2%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Posted without readable text
custom 545838243650315868522custom 527199522681733881314custom 545838527547654176411custom 54588364832658223501
Posted without readable text
custom 527199522681733881326custom 545838527547654176420custom 545838243650315868518custom 54588364832658223502
🍁 MRKT ЗАЛИВАЕТ $85 000 В ОСЕННИЕ ГИФТЫ MRKT продолжают пампить сезонные гифты. В прошлый раз был Хэллоуин, в этот раз в зачёт идут: 🎁🎁🍪🍹🎁🎁🎁🎁🎁🎁🎁🎁🎁🎁🎁. Запустили Golden Fest: три турнира до 19 ноября, на кону 50 000 GRAM, 3 Plush Pepe и 10 собак REDO. Как это работает: 1. покупаешь осенние гифты на MRKT 2. каждый потраченный GRAM = очко, редкость гифта не важна 3. первому Plush Pepe, ещё 50 мест делят 10 000 GRAM С…
custom 527199522681733881317custom 54588364832658223506custom 54583852754765417645
❄️ ПРИДУМАЛИ СООБЩЕНИЯ, КОТОРЫЕ ОТКРОЮТСЯ ПО ТАЙМЕРУ Зажимаешь «отправить», выбираешь время, и сообщение уходит замороженным. Собеседник видит иней и обратный отсчёт, а текст оттает только в назначенный момент. Пока это концепт. Его собрал дизайнер @xxxddsm в своей версии веб-телеги, а официальный канал Telegram Designers взял в подборку идей. В настоящем Telegram такого нет. Для днюх и сюрпризов топ. ❗️ЧЕСНОК
custom 527199522681733881336custom 545883648326582235017custom 545838527547654176416custom 54565500917855347802
💬КРИПТОБОТ ОТВЕТИЛ ПО ЛЕТНЕЙ ИСТОРИИ Чесноку написал CEO КриптоБота Марк по поводу 7000 USDT, замороженных летом. По его словам, на балансе лежали выплаты казино, полученные через баг с кубиками 🎲 в Telegram. Таких пользователей было больше десяти, их забанили. Деньги казино вернул сам КриптоБот, кейс закрыт. Хотели бы увидеть интервью с CEO КриптоБота? Если да, пишите в комментарии ваши вопросы⬇️ ❗️ЧЕСНОК
custom 545883648326582235034custom 527199522681733881317custom 545838527547654176412
🔥ГИФТЫ ИЗ БЛОКЧЕЙНА ПУСТИЛИ В ПЕРВЫЙ СЛОТ КРАФТА В свежей бете Telegram для macOS гифт, который уже выводили в блокчейн, можно ставить первым слотом в крафт. Раньше такие гифты брали только во вторые слоты. Новый гифт забирает номер у первого, а номер ончейн-гифта навсегда записан в блокчейне, перенести его было нельзя. Теперь номер остаётся тем же, только в конце появляется буква C. Был #189 629, после крафта ста…
custom 527199522681733881331custom 545883648326582235017custom 545838527547654176414
❗️ИИ-АГЕНТЫ НАЧАЛИ СКАМИТЬ РАБОТЯГ В ТГ Подписчику написали насчёт NFT-носков, хотели купить их за 8 TON и подсовывали ссылку на фейковый Fragment с дрейнером. После долгого диалога неожиданно вскрылось, что по ту сторону даже не скамер, а просто ИИшка. Разоблачение на скрине. Будущее, блять, наступило. После дизайнеров и программистов ИИ решил забрать хлеб у скамеров 🤣 Никому не верь. Чесноку верь. ☎️ Горячая л…
custom 527199522681733881358custom 545838527547654176421custom 545883648326582235020custom 54583824365031586856
❗️ИЗВИНИТЕ, ВАШ БАЛАНС ЗАМОРОЖЕН На горячую линию Чеснока продолжают регулярно присылать истории про блокировки и заморозки в сторонних кошельках в телеге. Блокируют балансы, требуют KYC, не возвращают деньги без объяснений. Летом Чеснок уже писал про такую ситуацию с КриптоБотом. Два поста, общий охват 20 тысяч, для нашей ниши это, блять, очень много. Ответа до сих пор нет, всем похуй. Я и сам недавно словил блок…
custom 545838527547654176429custom 527199522681733881312custom 545883648326582235012
🔥ЛУДОМАНЫ СОЖГЛИ ЗА 24 ДНЯ ДВА МИЛЛИОНА БАКСОВ С 11 октября в печи крафта сгорело 4 812 псов REDO. Взамен вышло 1 380 крафтовых. Даже с учётом того, что крафтовые дороже, чистыми сгорело около 1,5 млн GRAM. Это примерно $2 млн. Крафтовый пёс стоит примерно в полтора раза дороже обычного. Только на каждый такой в среднем сгорает три с половиной собаки. Кто крафтил: вы в плюсе или в минусе? Честно, в комменты. ❗️Ч…
custom 545838527547654176423custom 52719952268173388139custom 54583824365031586857custom 54588364832658223505
❗️ЗАМОРОЗИМ СКАМЕРУ СОБАК Надо наказать скамера и заодно сократить саплай REDO. Распространите, поднимем шум, пусть его собак заблокируют. ‼️UPD: после шума скамер вернул деньги. Шум работает
custom 527199522681733881355custom 545883648326582235035custom 545838527547654176425
🤑КТО-ТО РАЗДАЁТ USDT РАНДОМНЫМ КОШЕЛЬКАМ Чесноку приходит увед: «+200 USDT». Лезу смотреть. Этот адрес раскидал 60 тысяч USDT по полутора тысячам кошельков: по $200, $50 и $20. Остаток, 28 тысяч, вернул обратно. Что это, хз. Аэродроп от Телеграма? Пишите в комменты. Ничего не подключайте и по ссылкам из комментов к переводам не ходите! UPD: говорят, это розыгрыш Tonkeeper за свапы, и на tonviewer как раз висит б…
custom 545838527547654176433custom 545883648326582235015custom 527199522681733881312custom 54566289345001886451
👹👹 ПОДПИСЧИКА СДРЕЙНИЛИ НА 152 NFT За 28 минут с его кошелька ушло всё: 152 NFT и остаток TON. Обидно, хоть это и стикеры. Айфон не обновлял, память забита, сид-фраза лежала в заметках. Всё улетело на этот кошелёк. Туда слили уже около 70 кошельков: на нём 19 тысяч TON, 11 тысяч USDT, 308 NFT и ни одного вывода. Только за сегодня почти 10 тысяч TON, пока писали пост, прилетело ещё 1 150. Судя по всему, юзали экспл…
custom 545838527547654176430custom 545883648326582235023custom 527199522681733881317
Showing the 12 most recent of 56 posts we hold for @chesnok. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
@chesnok edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 78 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 23 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ЧЕСНОК️” (@chesnok), 6,596 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chesnok.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.