🔥 Оставленный без присмотра обогреватель едва не сжег дом в СНТ В челябинском СНТ «Нефтяник» вечер закончился бы трагедией, если бы не оперативная работа пожарных. Оставленный без присмотра обогреватель едва не превратил садовый домик в пепелище. К счастью, соседи не пострадали, а сам дом уцелел. Спасатели напоминают: эта техника в пустом помещении — настоящая бомба замедленного действия, которая может лишить имуще…

Channel
ЧП и ДТП | Регион 74 | Челябинск и область
@chp174
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
27,645subscribers
-73 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001217740357 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @chp174 |
| Description | 🚔 Аварии и криминал в Челябинске и Челябинской области от первоисточников. 😱Публикуем только зрелищный свежак! Подпишись ✅ 📲 Для ваших новостей и по вопросам рекламы сюда - @chp174bot 🤖 Регистрация в перечне РКН: https://vk.cc/cQVKfo |
| Created | 30 March 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 2 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 25 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 2 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/chp174 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2 Sept 2026, 13:43 | 27,645 | -4 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 15:42 | 27,649 | -8 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 12:38 | 27,657 | -13 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 14:15 | 27,670 | +3 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 14:34 | 27,667 | +9 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 18:02 | 27,658 | -3 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 16:26 | 27,661 | +1 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 13:33 | 27,660 | -2 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 14:44 | 27,662 | -8 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 16:05 | 27,670 | +3 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 11:54 | 27,667 | -4 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 13:08 | 27,671 | -9 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 11:17 | 27,680 | +3 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 08:22 | 27,677 | -5 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 09:55 | 27,682 | -5 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 19:29 | 27,687 | -22 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 08:38 | 27,709 | -11 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 00:14 | 27,720 | -8 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 22:22 | 27,728 | +9 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 21:18 | 27,719 | first reading |
Engagement
413 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 5.64%
- avg views ÷ 27,645 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,560
- 413 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.302%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 413
- of 413 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 378 of 413 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 413 (6 August 2026 – 3 September 2026) |
| Views total | 644,100 |
| Reactions total | 1,816 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 09:43 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈10,400
- Videos
- ≈8,680
- Links
- ≈829
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 3 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 52m 28s
- Average length
- 29s
Measured directly from 109 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,816 reactions across 360 posts, in 42 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 349 | 19.2% | |
| 🤬 | 228 | 12.6% | |
| 👍 | 200 | 11.0% | |
| 😱 | 154 | 8.48% | |
| 🤡 | 136 | 7.49% | |
| 👏 | 121 | 6.66% | |
| 😢 | 97 | 5.34% | |
| 🤣 | 66 | 3.63% | |
| 🤔 | 64 | 3.52% | |
| 😁 | 54 | 2.97% | |
| 🤯 | 46 | 2.53% | |
| 🔥 | 43 | 2.37% | |
| 👎 | 35 | 1.93% | |
| 🖕 | 31 | 1.71% | |
| 😭 | 27 | 1.49% | |
| 🙏 | 26 | 1.43% | |
| 💔 | 23 | 1.27% | |
| 🕊 | 18 | 0.991% | |
| ❤🔥 | 14 | 0.771% | |
| 🍾 | 12 | 0.661% | |
| 22 further kinds | 72 | 3.96% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 378 of the 413 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,816 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 413 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
- Ad load
- 2.18%
- 9 of 413 posts carry an ad marker
- Regulatory tokens
- 9
- posts carrying an erid · 9 distinct tokens
- Median views · ads
- 1,360
- over 9 measured posts
- Median views · rest
- 1,470
- over 404 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2W5zFGannn5 | 1 | 28 August 2026 | 28 August 2026 |
| 2W5zFGkeoCu | 1 | 13 August 2026 | 13 August 2026 |
| 2W5zFH67PWR | 1 | 19 August 2026 | 19 August 2026 |
| 2W5zFHDkm6y | 1 | 19 August 2026 | 19 August 2026 |
| 2W5zFHGkR5K | 1 | 18 August 2026 | 18 August 2026 |
| 2W5zFHmrGLq | 1 | 24 August 2026 | 24 August 2026 |
| 2W5zFJF6H7X | 1 | 13 August 2026 | 13 August 2026 |
| 2W5zFJoLWZw | 1 | 14 August 2026 | 14 August 2026 |
| 2W5zFK7Ztn5 | 1 | 20 August 2026 | 20 August 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 413 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 3 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
🚬 Накрыли крупную партию нелегальных сигарет В Еманжелинске накрыли масштабный табачный бизнес, который работал прямо из обычного продуктового ларька. Две местные жительницы решили подзаработать на продаже немаркированных сигарет, но их «предпринимательский» талант быстро пресекли силовики. Сотрудники МВД изъяли больше трех тысяч пачек сомнительного табака на общую сумму свыше 560 тысяч рублей. Теперь бывшим бизнес…
😱 Мужчина выпал из лодки в воду посреди озера и чудом выжил Рыбалка едва не закончилась трагедией для 38-летнего челябинца на Первом озере. Мужчина внезапно оказался в воде в десятках метров от берега, и его шансы на спасение таяли с каждой минутой. Оперативники МЧС успели вовремя: пострадавшего вытянули на сушу прямо из ледяной воды. Медики осмотрели спасенного на месте и отпустили домой, подтвердив, что серьезных…
😁1
🏍️ Жесткое ДТП на перекрестке попало на видео На перекрестке Комсомольского проспекта и улицы Косарева произошло жесткое ДТП: питбайкер на высокой скорости врезался в легковушку, которая выполняла поворот. Момент столкновения попал на камеры видеонаблюдения, в очередной раз напоминая о важности соблюдения правил всеми участниками движения. Ситуация приобрела резонанс из-за действий проезжавшей мимо машины скорой по…
🤡2❤1
😱 Пошли за грибами и не вернулись Спокойный сбор грибов в лесах Красноярского края закончился кошмаром для двух пенсионерок. Женщины отправились в лес 31 августа, но домой вернуться им было уже не суждено. Когда спасатели вышли на след пропавших, их ждала страшная находка. Оказалось, что на женщин напал медведь, и теперь правоохранители выясняют, почему зверь вышел к людям и как избежать новых жертв в ближайшее вре…
❤2👏1
🔥 Грузовик вспыхнул по пути к АЗС в Троицком районе В Троицком районе на трассе Троицк — Октябрьское загорелся грузовик. Водитель заметил дым под кабиной, когда подъезжал к заправке, и успел отъехать на безопасное расстояние. Мужчина пытался справиться с пламенем огнетушителями до приезда специалистов, а затем пожарные окончательно залили машину. Мастерство водителя и оперативность спасателей помогли избежать серье…
🤯2🔥1
⚖️ Получил срок за нападение на бригаду скорой В Шатрово Курганской области вынесен приговор 54-летнему местному жителю, который воспрепятствовал оказанию медицинской помощи сотрудникам скорой. Находясь в состоянии алкогольного опьянения, мужчина угрожал убийством фельдшеру и практикантке, применяя страйкбольный пистолет как инструмент запугивания. Инцидент привел к невозможности проведения необходимых манипуляций …
🤬2
Posted without readable text
❤1🤡1
🚫 Южноуралец получил 10 лет колонии за финансирование террористов Житель Каслей отправится за решетку на 10 лет за финансовую поддержку террористов. Мужчина в течение года регулярно переводил деньги запрещенной в России организации, пока его деятельность не пресекли сотрудники ФСБ. Теперь осужденному предстоит провести ближайшие годы в тюрьме и колонии строгого режима. Это серьезный урок для тех, кто считает, что д…
❤1
🌲 Вырубили лес на 2 миллиона рублей В Челябинской области возбуждено уголовное дело по факту незаконной рубки лесных насаждений в особо крупном размере. В Смолинском участковом лесничестве было уничтожено 46 берез, что нанесло ущерб лесному фонду на сумму около 1,9 млн рублей. Правоохранительные органы квалифицировали инцидент по части 3 статьи 260 УК РФ. В настоящий момент ведутся следственные действия, направленн…
👏2🤬1
🛤 Вагон грузового поезда сошел с рельсов Утро понедельника в Челябинской области началось с ЧП на железной дороге: грузовой поезд лишился одного из вагонов прямо на путях. Инцидент случился около половины девятого утра на участке между станциями Куйбас и Рудная, к счастью, обошлось без травм. Сейчас на месте уже работают ремонтные бригады, которые возвращают состав в норму. Экспертам еще предстоит выяснить, что име…
❤2🤔1
Posted without readable text
🤡1
Showing the 12 most recent of 413 posts we hold for @chp174. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@nashchelyabinsk · 125,109
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 13 August 2026
@chelyabinsk_smi · 108,483
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 14 August 2026
@cheliabinsktop · 55,549
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 23 August 2026
@news_74ru · 168,099
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 12 August 2026
@bezopasnost112 · 58,354
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 22 August 2026
@newschelyaba · 39,785
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 30 August 2026
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ЧП и ДТП | Регион 74 | Челябинск и область” (@chp174), 27,645 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chp174.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.