Channel
@inburgchel
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
10,308subscribers
+39 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001494074021 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @inburgchel |
| Created | 11 February 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 32 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/inburgchel |
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 06:00 | 10,308 | +9 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 09:19 | 10,299 | -3 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 07:39 | 10,302 | +5 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 23:18 | 10,297 | +5 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 12:37 | 10,292 | +2 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 01:40 | 10,290 | -3 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 20:40 | 10,293 | -6 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 11:55 | 10,299 | +2 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 10:54 | 10,297 | +1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 08:24 | 10,296 | -4 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 07:28 | 10,300 | -6 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 09:13 | 10,306 | +8 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 06:53 | 10,298 | +43 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 09:37 | 10,255 | +4 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 11:56 | 10,251 | -1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 16:13 | 10,252 | -1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 22:25 | 10,253 | +3 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 14:35 | 10,250 | -6 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 13:37 | 10,256 | +3 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 16:26 | 10,253 | first reading |
232 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 38 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 16 of 35 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 232 (6 August 2026 – 29 August 2026) |
| Views total | 14,643 |
| Reactions total | 41 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 29 Aug 2026, 17:20 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 23 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
480 reactions across 125 posts, in 30 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 98 | 20.4% | |
| 👍 | 90 | 18.8% | |
| 👎 | 51 | 10.6% | |
| 🤬 | 49 | 10.2% | |
| 🤡 | 31 | 6.46% | |
| 🔥 | 23 | 4.79% | |
| 😭 | 18 | 3.75% | |
| 😢 | 16 | 3.33% | |
| 😱 | 14 | 2.92% | |
| 🥰 | 14 | 2.92% | |
| 🙏 | 10 | 2.08% | |
| 💩 | 9 | 1.88% | |
| 💔 | 6 | 1.25% | |
| 😁 | 6 | 1.25% | |
| ❤🔥 | 5 | 1.04% | |
| 👏 | 5 | 1.04% | |
| 😇 | 5 | 1.04% | |
| 😍 | 4 | 0.833% | |
| 🤔 | 4 | 0.833% | |
| 😡 | 3 | 0.625% | |
| 10 further kinds | 19 | 3.96% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 137 of the 232 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 480 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 232 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 29 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @inburgchel. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 232 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 August 2026 to 29 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2W5zFJ1SvmF | 1 | 17 August 2026 | 17 August 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 232 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 29 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
👮♂️ Пять девушек оказались в полиции после рейда в спа-салоне Магнитогорска Полицейские проверили помещения и документы салона, а пятерых сотрудниц доставили в отдел для разбирательства. Их проверили по базам МВД и сняли отпечатки пальцев. Материалы проверки сейчас рассматривают.
😲 Огромную клетку для перевозки медведей украли у челябинского приюта Из приюта диких животных «Спаси меня» исчезла гигантская транспортировочная конструкция для крупных хищников. Сын основателя приюта Давид Даллакян случайно обнаружил пропажу за стеной возле вольера медведицы Софии Кареновны, о чём рассказал «КП-Челябинск». Клетка высотой более 1,7 метра сделана из толстого металла и арматуры. Унести её вручную не…
🔥 Четверо детей самостоятельно выбрались из горящего дома в Верхнем Уфалее Пожар на улице Чехова уничтожил дом и надворные постройки на площади 168 квадратных метров. К счастью, дети успели выйти до приезда пожарных, никто не пострадал.
У пешеходных переходов в Челябинске начали устанавливать ростовые куклы
❤1
В Челябинске завершилась вторая очередь межуниверситетского кампуса: в новых гостиницах у ЧелГУ зажглись окна. С нового учебного года здесь будут жить студенты. Номера на 1–2 человека оснащены кроватью с ортопедическим матрасом, столом, шкафом, холодильником и санузлом с душевой.
❤4
⛽️В связи с ситуацией с бензином в городе создали канал для обмена информацией на АЗС Подписчики канала «ГДЕ БЕНЗИН ЧЕЛЯБИНСК» сообщают, на каких АЗС города есть топливо, какие марки и какая очередь. ❗️Подпишись СРОЧНО пока доступ в канал открыт! ⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️ https://max.ru/join/ZwDOqwhhBWxUlRxl1HGgBPUX4aUtIQ2qIu2KnyS79hI
❤1
В Коркино: двое детей пострадали от удара током на подстанции Семилетние девочки проникли внутрь трансформаторной подстанции на улице Лермонтова. Доступ на объект оказался свободным, что и стало причиной трагедии. Прокуратура уже выявила серьезные нарушения требований безопасности. В отношении ответственных лиц возбуждено уголовное дело по статье «Халатность». К счастью, состояние девочек сейчас стабильное, врачи …
⛽️ Оперативный штаб рассказал о ситуации с бензином в Челябинской области бензин Спрос на топливо в регионе заметно вырос: у некоторых нефтяных компаний — на 18% за неделю, а на отдельных АЗС количество покупателей увеличилось вдвое. Власти связывают это с концом отпусков и дачного сезона, возвращением людей в города и подготовкой к 1 сентября. При этом объёмы поставок, по данным оперштаба, не сокращались. Огранич…
В СИЗО до 27 октября заключили предпринимателя Максима Ермакова, фигуранта дела о хищении свыше 30 млн рублей при поставке питания в школы Челябинска. Его задержали вместе с Галиной Галицыной. Обвинение: фиктивные договоры субподряда и завышение стоимости продуктов.
🦆 В Челябинской области открыт сезон охоты Первыми под прицел попадут утки, гуси, рябчики, тетерева, глухари и вальдшнепы. С 1 сентября откроют охоту на лося, позже — на зайцев, лис и енотовидных собак. Сезон продлится до конца ноября.
👎2😢1
🏅 Челябинец решил отправить советские награды в Германию за $1 В посылке таможенники нашли семь медалей и орденов, спрятанных между картоном и обмотанных фольгой. В декларации отправитель назвал их обычными значками и оценил всё содержимое в один доллар. Четыре награды признали культурными ценностями, вывоз которых запрещён. Теперь мужчине грозит до пяти лет колонии.
🚔 ГИБДД устроит масштабные рейды на дорогах Челябинска С пятницы инспекторы усилят контроль и выставят мобильные пункты проверки. Особое внимание уделят пьяным водителям.
Showing the 12 most recent of 232 posts we hold for @inburgchel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Челябинск новости” (@inburgchel), 10,308 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/inburgchel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.