Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ЧП Краснодара

Channel

ЧП Краснодара

@chpyug

2 usernames

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

28,482subscribers

-66 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001762918055
TypeChannel
Usernames@chpkrasnodar @chpyug
Created3 April 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live1 September 2026
Measurements held48
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 1 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/chpyug

Topic

National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 73% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. They sit inside a group of 4 channels that share the same post bodies with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

No sample pairs were kept for this entry. The counts below were measured, but without the pairs there is nothing here for you to open and check, so treat the relationship as recorded rather than demonstrated.

Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@ghestkrasnodara135 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (332)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 64 comparable posts for this entry, running 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 4, the earliest publisher we hold is @chpyug — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 8 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 3 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

28,45328,54828,500.56 August 2026 — 28,548 subscribers6 August 2026 — 28,543 subscribers6 August 2026 — 28,545 subscribers6 August 2026 — 28,545 subscribers7 August 2026 — 28,541 subscribers7 August 2026 — 28,538 subscribers8 August 2026 — 28,535 subscribers9 August 2026 — 28,530 subscribers9 August 2026 — 28,527 subscribers10 August 2026 — 28,524 subscribers10 August 2026 — 28,524 subscribers11 August 2026 — 28,518 subscribers11 August 2026 — 28,516 subscribers12 August 2026 — 28,524 subscribers12 August 2026 — 28,535 subscribers13 August 2026 — 28,534 subscribers13 August 2026 — 28,527 subscribers14 August 2026 — 28,524 subscribers15 August 2026 — 28,519 subscribers15 August 2026 — 28,515 subscribers16 August 2026 — 28,508 subscribers17 August 2026 — 28,506 subscribers17 August 2026 — 28,501 subscribers18 August 2026 — 28,498 subscribers18 August 2026 — 28,491 subscribers19 August 2026 — 28,481 subscribers19 August 2026 — 28,477 subscribers20 August 2026 — 28,473 subscribers20 August 2026 — 28,470 subscribers21 August 2026 — 28,462 subscribers22 August 2026 — 28,462 subscribers23 August 2026 — 28,457 subscribers23 August 2026 — 28,453 subscribers24 August 2026 — 28,523 subscribers24 August 2026 — 28,523 subscribers25 August 2026 — 28,541 subscribers25 August 2026 — 28,541 subscribers26 August 2026 — 28,527 subscribers27 August 2026 — 28,527 subscribers28 August 2026 — 28,517 subscribers28 August 2026 — 28,517 subscribers28 August 2026 — 28,506 subscribers29 August 2026 — 28,506 subscribers30 August 2026 — 28,503 subscribers30 August 2026 — 28,503 subscribers31 August 2026 — 28,495 subscribers31 August 2026 — 28,495 subscribers1 September 2026 — 28,482 subscribers28,4826 August 20261 September 2026
48 measurements spanning 26 days, net -66. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 28,439–28,562 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 48
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
1 Sept 2026, 01:3728,482-13
31 Aug 2026, 01:5328,495no change
31 Aug 2026, 01:2428,495-8
30 Aug 2026, 00:4928,503no change
30 Aug 2026, 00:1228,503-3
29 Aug 2026, 03:4728,506no change
28 Aug 2026, 22:1728,506-11
28 Aug 2026, 01:0428,517no change
28 Aug 2026, 00:5728,517-10
27 Aug 2026, 02:4628,527no change
26 Aug 2026, 22:4528,527-14
25 Aug 2026, 23:3328,541no change
25 Aug 2026, 22:1228,541+18
24 Aug 2026, 22:2828,523no change
24 Aug 2026, 21:5928,523+70
23 Aug 2026, 12:1828,453-4
23 Aug 2026, 07:2328,457-5
22 Aug 2026, 00:4728,462no change
21 Aug 2026, 20:1728,462-8
20 Aug 2026, 19:1228,470first reading

Engagement

464 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.87%
avg views ÷ 28,482 subscribers
Avg views / post
816
464 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.324%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
464
of 464 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 260 of 464 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 August 2026
Posts held464 (5 August 202627 August 2026)
Views total378,781
Reactions total771
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken27 Aug 2026, 07:09 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2h 20m
Average length
35s

Measured directly from 241 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

771 reactions across 222 posts, in 30 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
23430.4%
😭759.73%
🙏658.43%
🤬526.74%
😱445.71%
😢425.45%
👍374.80%
🤡283.63%
🤣243.11%
😁222.85%
😡222.85%
🤯202.59%
💯172.20%
🙉151.95%
🕊141.82%
🔥101.30%
👎81.04%
😨81.04%
🤔70.908%
👏50.649%
10 further kinds222.85%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 260 of the 464 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 771 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 464 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 27 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
0.216%
1 of 464 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
1,090
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
741
over 463 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2VtzqvQkKh5124 August 202624 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 464 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 27 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

27 Aug 2026, 06:44 UTC163 viewsread 27 August 2026
Forwarded from @krasnodarkray1Photo

😔Два человека пострадали в массовом ДТП с бензовозом на Кубани. Авария произошла на трассе Краснодар — Кропоткин в Кавказском районе. Водитель грузовика MAN не выдержал дистанцию и врезался в Hyundai Accent. От удара легковушку отбросило в ехавший впереди Volvo с полуприцепом-бензовозом. Травмы получили водитель и пассажир Hyundai. Обстоятельства аварии устанавливаются. ⚡️Чтобы оставаться в курсе всех событий края

27 Aug 2026, 06:07 UTC322 viewsread 27 August 2026
Forwarded from @krasnodarkray1Video

😟 В Анапе блогер устроил провокации на улицах города. Местные просят проверить его действия. На опубликованных кадрах молодой человек вместе с компанией ходит по городу и оскорбляет прохожих. Жители Анапы требуют, чтобы правоохранители проверили действия участников ролика и дали им правовую оценку. ⚡️Чтобы оставаться в курсе всех событий края переходите в наш МАХ 👉 https://max.ru/krasnodarkray1 *Уже подписано 17

26 Aug 2026, 21:18 UTC≈1,190 views1 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Forwarded from @krasnodarkray1

📢Краснодар и близлежащие, тревога по БпЛА. Lpr Вся информация по БПЛА на территории края будет опубликована в нашем канале в MAX 🇷🇺 👇👇👇 https://max.ru/krasnodarkray1 https://max.ru/krasnodarkray1 https://max.ru/krasnodarkray1

🕊1

26 Aug 2026, 19:36 UTC≈1,760 views2 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Video

⚠️ Момент нападения психа на таксиста в Армавире. За минуту до этого таксист (он на чёрном авто) отказался везти неадеквата, объехал многоквартирный дом и после началось вот это. Напомним, инцидент произошёл в Северном микрорайоне вечером 26 августа у дома №2 на проспекте Авиаторов. Очевидцы сообщают, что двое мужчин, предположительно снимавших квартиру в этом доме посуточно, начали вести себя агрессивно и пристава

🤬2

26 Aug 2026, 18:34 UTC≈1,590 viewsread 27 August 2026
Video

В Армавире двое мужчин избили таксиста, который отказался их везти. Пострадавший серьезно ранен Об инциденте в Северном микрорайоне сообщают наши читатели. По их словам, вечером 26 августа у дома №2 на проспекте Авиаторов двое мужчин, предположительно снимавших квартиру посуточно, начали вести себя агрессивно и приставать к прохожим. Позже у них возник конфликт с приехавшим водителем такси — мужчина отказался брать

26 Aug 2026, 17:04 UTC≈1,360 viewsread 27 August 2026
Video

🐕Настроение жаркого августа в Сочи — плюхнуться в реку, как этот собакен, и отказываться выходить 0% осуждения, 100% понимания. ❗️Подпишись — https://max.ru/tipichkrasnodar

26 Aug 2026, 16:21 UTC≈1,390 views1 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Video

🙃 Очередь за бензином в Анапе закончилась дракой. Потасовка произошла на АЗС «Экоойл» на улице Парковой. По словам очевидцев, у водителей, несколько часов простоявших в очереди за топливом, не выдержали нервы. Видео без цензуры 👇👇👇 https://max.ru/chpyug https://max.ru/chpyug https://max.ru/chpyug

1

26 Aug 2026, 15:27 UTC≈1,190 viewsread 27 August 2026
Forwarded from @krasnodarkray1Photo

❗️Сирены будут периодически включать по всему Краснодару. В мэрии объяснили, что это плановая проверка системы оповещения. Поэтому жители разных районов могут время от времени слышать одиночные сигналы. Если возникнет реальная опасность, власти отдельно сообщат об этом через оф каналы. ⚡️Чтобы оставаться в курсе всех событий края переходите в наш МАХ 👉 https://max.ru/krasnodarkray1 *Уже подписано 170 000 человек

26 Aug 2026, 13:41 UTC≈1,260 views3 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Forwarded from @krasnodarkray1Photo

⛽️ Бензин в Краснодаре резко подешевел после разборок с АЗС. Антимонопольщики обратили внимание на цены на заправках «Степная», «Уфимнефть», «Лаба», «Южная нефтяная компания» и «Нефтесфера». В отношении части компаний возбудили дела, после чего стоимость топлива пошла вниз. Например, на «Степной» АИ-95 подешевел со 140 до 120 рублей за литр, а дизель — со 135 до 100 рублей. ⚡️Чтобы оставаться в курсе всех событий

😁21

26 Aug 2026, 13:10 UTC≈1,140 views7 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Forwarded from @krasnodarkray1Video

👀 Канье Уэста позвали выступить под Анапой — в музее пыток. После новостей об отмене концертов рэпера в Санкт-Петербурге директор Музея Средневековья и пыток в Сукко записал публичное обращение к артисту и пригласил его в Краснодарский край. «Мистер Канье Уэст, мы знаем, что ваш концерт в Санкт-Петербурге отменен. Как русский человек, мы привыкли помогать друг другу. И хотим пригласить вас в Краснодарский край», —

🤣4🔥2🤮1

26 Aug 2026, 12:52 UTC≈1,070 views5 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Forwarded from @krasnodarkray1Video

😡Разбитые электросамокаты, повреждённая плитка и искорёженные магазинные тележки — такой ущерб, по словам соседей, оставляет после себя компания подростков на Тюляева, 8. Ребята регулярно собираются у коммерческих помещений, распыляют огнетушители и катаются на тележках. Местные также утверждают, что подростки делают зажигательные смеси. На видео — очередные развлечения компании. Жители говорят, что записи происход

🤬5

26 Aug 2026, 11:57 UTC≈1,080 views2 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Forwarded from @krasnodarkray1Video

❗️Задержан житель Славянска-на-Кубани, который нанёс свастику. Мужчина признался в содеянном и заявил, что раскаивается. По его словам, он думал, что поступок останется безнаказанным. «Сегодня меня задержали. Я раскаиваюсь в содеянном и больше такого не повторится», — заявил задержанный ⚡️Чтобы оставаться в курсе всех событий края переходите в наш МАХ 👉 https://max.ru/krasnodarkray1 *Уже подписано 170 000 челове

👏2

Showing the 12 most recent of 464 posts we hold for @chpyug. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Краснодар и край
@krasnodarkray1 · 189,818
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 11 August 2026
Краснодар ДТП и ЧП | КРДДТП | Авто новости Кубани
@krddtp1 · 43,668
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 28 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ЧП Краснодара” (@chpyug), 28,482 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chpyug.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.