Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Приоритет для ОТ в городах

Channel

Приоритет для ОТ в городах

@city_transport

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

5,206subscribers

+81 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001113367447
TypeChannel
Username@city_transport
Created18 July 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 September 2026
Measurements held16
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/city_transport

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 80% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

5,1105,2065,1586 August 2026 — 5,125 subscribers6 August 2026 — 5,125 subscribers6 August 2026 — 5,122 subscribers9 August 2026 — 5,117 subscribers12 August 2026 — 5,112 subscribers15 August 2026 — 5,111 subscribers19 August 2026 — 5,117 subscribers22 August 2026 — 5,110 subscribers25 August 2026 — 5,118 subscribers28 August 2026 — 5,133 subscribers31 August 2026 — 5,123 subscribers4 September 2026 — 5,130 subscribers9 September 2026 — 5,131 subscribers13 September 2026 — 5,156 subscribers17 September 2026 — 5,171 subscribers25 September 2026 — 5,206 subscribers6 August 202625 September 2026
16 measurements spanning 50 days, net +81. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,096–5,220 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Sept 2026, 11:425,206+35
17 Sept 2026, 03:585,171+15
13 Sept 2026, 11:005,156+25
9 Sept 2026, 15:015,131+1
4 Sept 2026, 01:225,130+7
31 Aug 2026, 10:585,123-10
28 Aug 2026, 07:135,133+15
25 Aug 2026, 05:545,118+8
22 Aug 2026, 02:165,110-7
19 Aug 2026, 03:345,117+6
15 Aug 2026, 18:035,111-1
12 Aug 2026, 14:155,112-5
9 Aug 2026, 15:125,117-5
6 Aug 2026, 22:065,122-3
6 Aug 2026, 03:475,125no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:415,125first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 30 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
52s
Average length
52s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,293 reactions across 11 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤33125.6%
😁29222.6%
🔥22617.5%
👍15211.8%
👏775.96%
🤷655.03%
🎉644.95%
💯231.78%
🥴211.62%
😍161.24%
😢100.773%
🤗60.464%
👎50.387%
😡30.232%
🤔20.155%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,293 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 30 June 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 19:18 UTC≈1,420 views93 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Доверяйте только практикам. Причём практикам, реализовавшим реальные улучшения транспортных систем 11 лет профессионально занимаясь транспортом, не перестаю с улыбкой наблюдать известную картину. То тут, то там выскакивают какие-то псевдо транспортные эксперты и начинают всех учить правильно развивать транспорт. Они налево и направо раздают комментарии в СМИ, по любым темам, даже в которых совсем не разбираются. Во…

😁67🤷14❤5💯5👎1🥴1

5 Aug 2026, 10:17 UTC≈1,030 views85 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @gre4arkVideo

Не работает метробус? Это автобусы виноваты! В Воронеже случился настоящий виктимблейминг: водителей автобусов обвинили в срыве проекта «метробуса». Про предысторию я уже рассказывал: власти испугались сложной реформы и решили назвать громким словом «метробус» обычные выделенки с резиновым бордюрчиком. При этом никто не убрал парковки, лишние выезды со дворов и машины с пути автобусов — на видео хорошо видно, наско…

👍43😁19🥴10💯9🤷3❤1

3 Aug 2026, 11:49 UTC≈3,250 views73 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Актуальное сравнение трамвайных систем крупных городов (без столиц) Из положительного. Подросли на 5 и 9% средняя ЗП водителей и часовая базовая ставка. В 1.5 раза увеличился выпуск трёхсекционников. Чуть снизился возраст водителей. Из отрицательного. Наибольшие опасения вызывают трамвайные системы в Ростове-на-Дону, Уфе, Иркутске и Калининграде. Явно прослеживаются признаки увядания: - малый выпуск; - низкие ЗП, з…

❤56👍10😁4👎1💯1🥴1

1 Aug 2026, 08:39 UTC≈2,940 views85 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Пока вся страна топчется на месте (в большинстве городов выделенки проектируются некачественно), Москва прёт только вперёд, всё совершенствуя приоритетный проезд для ОТ 👏👏👏

🎉59🔥10🤗6🥴5😡3🤔2

26 Jul 2026, 12:46 UTC≈2,760 views63 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Как и прогнозировалось, транспорт Твери вместо комплексной транспортной реформы (не на шутку распиаренной в 2020 году) остаётся на прежнем низком уровне - https://t.me/zotovmedia/4898?single - выделенок нет - гармошек нет - газового транспорта нет - электротранспорта нет - билетное меню неэффективное

🤷42😢10🎉5😁4🥴2

26 Jul 2026, 05:27 UTC≈2,570 views132 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

В Воронеже начали физическое обособление выделенок делиниаторами Когда-то очень давно такое пробовали в Петербурге, но в итоге делиниаторы демонтировали. И за последние лет 15 другие города не повторяли, опасаясь сложностей с уборкой снега (Воронеж вроде как планирует снимать делиниаторы на зиму). Интересно понаблюдать за результатами. Вообще подобное обособление выделенок полезно не на всём коридоре ВП, а на пробл…

🔥87👍25😁8❤7👏3🤷2

15 Jul 2026, 18:14 UTC≈2,650 views111 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @ilyabirman_channelPhoto

Опубликовал целую кучу штук, сделанных за последние годы для челябинского транспорта: https://ilyabirman.ru/chelyabinsk/stuff/

❤85👏13👍8👎3🤷1🥴1

15 Jul 2026, 15:08 UTC≈2,960 views105 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @rollingstockPhoto

Александр Егоров: Ренессанс трамвайных систем в России когда-то обязательно начнется В последние годы Челябинск стал одним из центров обновления трамвайного транспорта страны. Эти работы включают масштабные закупки подвижного состава, капитальный ремонт путей, внедрение цифровых технологий и собственные проекты по путевым машинам. В эксклюзивном интервью ROLLINGSTOCK заместитель министра дорожного хозяйства и транс…

❤70👍24👏7😁2💯1🥴1

3 Jul 2026, 12:06 UTC≈3,610 views224 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁183👏21❤19🤷1

3 Jul 2026, 07:05 UTC≈5,020 views136 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Скорость/комфорт/стоимость На заре зарождения нового транспортного урбанизма в России (10-15 лет назад) многие сформулировали 3 базовых критерия выбора вида транспорта пассажиром (в крупных городах): скорость, комфорт и стоимость. Кто-то пошёл дальше, детализировав критерии до 7, но и их можно было условно сгруппировать в 3 основных направления. Старая транспортная школа и наука тогда ещё не разделяла и особо не пр…

❤84👍33👏8💯7🤷2😁2

30 Jun 2026, 16:50 UTC≈2,710 views186 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Десяток автобусных маршрутов Петербурга предложено перевести на троллейбусы В связи с дефицитом топлива многие города ещё раз задумались (может на этот раз даже серьёзно) о переходе на экологичное топливо - электроэнергию и газ. В сложной ситуации оказались города, где отсутствует или деградирует электротранспорт, а также где при обновлении техники закупали автобусы на дизеле (Тверь, Калуга, Владимир, Иркутск, Ивано…

🔥129👏25😍16👍9❤4😁3

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @city_transport. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

🔴🟡🟢 Города в потоке
@citiesinmotion · 28,628
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 11 September 2026
Город для людей
@gre4ark · 49,039
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 26 August 2026
СпецДорПроект
@spetsdor · 29,290
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 8 September 2026
Велобайк
@velobikerus · 21,814
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 22 September 2026
Темникова Юлия
@temnikova_yuliya · 32,135
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 5 September 2026

This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Приоритет для ОТ в городах” (@city_transport), 5,206 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/city_transport.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.