Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Cloud

Channel

Cloud

@cloudeluxe

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

21,738subscribers

+459 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001883896583
TypeChannel
Username@cloudeluxe
Created20 September 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 September 2026
Measurements held28
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/cloudeluxe

Growth

21,27921,73821,508.56 August 2026 — 21,279 subscribers6 August 2026 — 21,289 subscribers7 August 2026 — 21,314 subscribers8 August 2026 — 21,303 subscribers9 August 2026 — 21,302 subscribers10 August 2026 — 21,308 subscribers11 August 2026 — 21,300 subscribers12 August 2026 — 21,297 subscribers13 August 2026 — 21,308 subscribers15 August 2026 — 21,436 subscribers16 August 2026 — 21,539 subscribers17 August 2026 — 21,565 subscribers18 August 2026 — 21,570 subscribers19 August 2026 — 21,567 subscribers20 August 2026 — 21,580 subscribers22 August 2026 — 21,589 subscribers23 August 2026 — 21,585 subscribers24 August 2026 — 21,587 subscribers25 August 2026 — 21,592 subscribers26 August 2026 — 21,586 subscribers27 August 2026 — 21,633 subscribers28 August 2026 — 21,694 subscribers29 August 2026 — 21,723 subscribers31 August 2026 — 21,718 subscribers1 September 2026 — 21,708 subscribers1 September 2026 — 21,706 subscribers3 September 2026 — 21,715 subscribers4 September 2026 — 21,738 subscribers6 August 20264 September 2026
28 measurements spanning 29 days, net +459. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 21,210–21,807 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 28
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Sept 2026, 12:1521,738+23
3 Sept 2026, 01:4921,715+9
1 Sept 2026, 20:5321,706-2
1 Sept 2026, 00:1321,708-10
31 Aug 2026, 02:1621,718-5
29 Aug 2026, 23:5721,723+29
28 Aug 2026, 23:4221,694+61
27 Aug 2026, 21:3321,633+47
26 Aug 2026, 19:5821,586-6
25 Aug 2026, 20:1521,592+5
24 Aug 2026, 23:0921,587+2
23 Aug 2026, 12:2221,585-4
22 Aug 2026, 01:4421,589+9
20 Aug 2026, 18:1521,580+13
19 Aug 2026, 17:0721,567-3
18 Aug 2026, 17:1721,570+5
17 Aug 2026, 20:2821,565+26
16 Aug 2026, 18:3421,539+103
15 Aug 2026, 02:2221,436+128
13 Aug 2026, 17:2921,308first reading

Engagement

361 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 60 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
30.5%
avg views ÷ 21,738 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,620
325 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.60%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
330
of 361 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held361 (3 August 20263 September 2026)
Views total2,151,600
Reactions total34,500
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 13:35 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1h 39m
Average length
53s

Measured directly from 113 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

35,702 reactions across 337 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
23,23765.1%
custom 52132256130531748733,66010.3%
💔2,9658.30%
custom 52044391880023518322,9488.26%
🤡2,8928.10%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 356 of the 361 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 37,042 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 361 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
21
across the posts below
Posts paid on
16
of 356 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @cloudeluxe. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 361 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 3 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

3 Sept 2026, 13:13 UTC≈2,240 views67 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Че ждёшь из релизов сегондя

custom 5213225613053174873614🤡2

3 Sept 2026, 08:25 UTC≈5,520 views135 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

101custom 520443918800235183224💔6custom 52132256130531748734

2 Sept 2026, 14:59 UTC≈8,060 views129 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

IVAN ZOLO анонсировал новый тур ☁️ cloud music

63🤡61custom 52132256130531748735

2 Sept 2026, 14:33 UTC≈7,410 views102 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Voskresenskii - Стиралка [Official Music Video] ☁️ cloud music

🤡47custom 52044391880023518324213

2 Sept 2026, 13:07 UTC≈8,030 views270 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

там у кая еще промо года

193🤡44custom 521322561305317487331custom 52044391880023518322

2 Sept 2026, 13:05 UTC≈7,690 views54 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

4n Way — "Мои Уличные Девочки" (Тизер Альбома) 04.09.26 // ☁️ cloud music

47🤡7

2 Sept 2026, 01:28 UTC≈8,870 views287 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

MORGENSHTERN* раскрыл подробности нового альбома На момент съемок интервью в июле: • альбом записан на половину • потрачено 300к$ только на запись (для сравнения на ep «ALISHER» было потрачено 20к$) • будет задействовано более 100 музыкантов * — иноагент на территории рф ☁️ cloud music

custom 520443918800235183225037

1 Sept 2026, 20:38 UTC≈8,690 views114 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

кидай свои результаты https://music.apple.com/ru/replay

🤡102custom 520443918800235183283💔1

1 Sept 2026, 16:45 UTC≈8,750 views249 reactionsread 3 September 2026

А ведь это не ты виноват, что тизерил нл2, а выпустил это

245🤡4

1 Sept 2026, 16:45 UTC≈7,850 views184 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @lilkrystalll

Опыт ЕП подтвердил одну вещь - моя фанбаза окончательно оскотинилась

116🤡65custom 52044391880023518323

1 Sept 2026, 15:02 UTC≈9,080 views153 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

PHARAOH анонсировал третью дату концерта на втб арене ☁️ cloud music

124custom 520443918800235183217💔7🤡4custom 52132256130531748731

1 Sept 2026, 14:51 UTC≈8,740 views61 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Nekoglai в Drey Mafii ☁️ cloud music

🤡4417

Showing the 12 most recent of 361 posts we hold for @cloudeluxe. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

14 Aug 2026, 07:49 UTCAnonymous Poll758 voters

С какого альбома ещё трек?

  1. AQYLA35%
  2. LIL FLASH$69%

The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 361 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 3 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

STUDIO 21
@studio21ru · 44,838
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 27 August 2026
Риса за Творчество / РЗТ
@risazatvorchestvo · 161,403
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 12 August 2026
LILDRUGHILL
@lildrughill1 · 51,462
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 25 August 2026
Рифмы и Музыка
@rhymesmus · 378,985
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 10 August 2026
УБИВАЮ BPM
@bpmkiller · 80,375
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 18 August 2026
РЭП СМИ
@rapsmi · 58,348
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 22 August 2026
SLAVA MARLOW
@slavamarlow · 67,451
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 20 August 2026
viperr
@viperr49 · 72,155
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 19 August 2026
THRILL РILL
@lilthrill · 42,986
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 29 August 2026
CODEINE CRAZY.
@CodeineCrazyTG · 62,693
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 21 August 2026
AARNE TEAM
@aarneteam · 86,319
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 18 August 2026
No Cap
@nocap · 55,455
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 23 August 2026
РИМ 🕊
@rhymesrim · 298,896
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 10 August 2026
MORGENSHTERN
@alisherhateu · 642,553
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 8 August 2026

This channel appears in 14 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Cloud” (@cloudeluxe), 21,738 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cloudeluxe.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.