Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 51% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
7 measurements spanning 41 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 483–489 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 12:59
484
-1
10 Sept 2026, 10:15
485
-2
31 Aug 2026, 07:22
487
-1
24 Aug 2026, 23:43
488
+1
16 Aug 2026, 18:14
487
+2
9 Aug 2026, 04:12
485
no change
8 Aug 2026, 05:31
485
first reading
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 20 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
10s
Average length
10s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
373 reactions across 15 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
111
29.8%
😁
64
17.2%
💔
56
15.0%
😭
50
13.4%
🔥
29
7.77%
❤🔥
22
5.90%
custom 5247240873569175088
17
4.56%
🤷♀
8
2.14%
🥰
6
1.61%
custom 5246800978723749838
5
1.34%
custom 5220058704157617291
4
1.07%
😱
1
0.268%
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 373 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 20 March 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 17 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @conamore_dt. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 March 2026 to 31 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
О, блять, началось… На хую уже вертят ту ДанТину все, кому не лень. Да угомонитесь уже, ради Бога.
ДанТины нет — об этом говорилось уже тысячу раз. Есть люди, которые стали свидетелями этой истории, которые остались здесь из-за своих воспоминаний, приобретенных в тот период людей и исключительно по собственному желанию. И эти люди, если нужна поддержка, даже в нынешних условиях и при нынешнем статусе способны разъеб…
спасибо самому завистливому фанклубу, что демонстрируете всем, что фандом Дантина живее всех живых 🤣
Эта гонка под названием «любыми путями, любыми деньгами — лишь бы больше, чем у Дана» с 16 часов сегодняшнего дня, когда стало очевидно, что руками поддерживать голосование уже никто не даст, превратилась в отдельное шоу. Теперь это уже не про голосование, а про: «давайте посмотрим, сколько денег они готовы на это по…
Тина Кароль и ФанТина как обычно пробили дно
Насколько нужно быть ущербной, неуверенной в себе, завистливой и эгоистичной фанбазой, какой артист, такой и фк, чтоб вместо самостоятельного голосования пойти привычным путем и купить накрутку? че так мало купили, надо было больше
Вы правда думаете, что все, кроме вас, долбаебы?
Блять, Вы просто тупоголовые клоуны, не способные понять, что это, сука, не соревнования
с п…
Не понимаю истерик и эмоций в анонимке. Вас не повеселило? Нас повеселило, как осознанно подошли к подготовке рубрики «вопрос-ответ»😁 Была структура, упорядоченные вопросы, начали с дуэта с найкращим (хотя я думала, что она на этом остановится, если честно😂), продолжили тем, что не общается — прям плавный переход в связке. Ну то есть выбрали ключевое. Хотя явно, что на сегодня в процентном соотношении этих вопросов в…
Тина Кароль, мой день рождения для тебя особенный день, я понимаю
Но выбери себе другую дату для публичных ответов на вопросы про Дана Балана 😚
Всем похуй, а мне с этим жить
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @conamore_dt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘢𝘮𝘰𝘳𝘦,𝘥𝘢𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘢” (@conamore_dt), 484 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/conamore_dt.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
