Channel
@createonvolga
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,092subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001902086953 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @createonvolga |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/createonvolga |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Sept 2026, 03:56 | 1,092 | +1 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 00:28 | 1,091 | -2 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 04:13 | 1,093 | -3 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 01:16 | 1,096 | +1 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 06:28 | 1,095 | +2 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 12:42 | 1,093 | -1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 20:05 | 1,094 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:19 | 1,096 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 22:00 | 1,096 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 7 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
202 reactions across 15 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🎉 | 46 | 22.8% | |
| 👏 | 22 | 10.9% | |
| custom 5240144866041679825 | 20 | 9.90% | |
| 🌭 | 18 | 8.91% | |
| custom 5239951742837215440 | 14 | 6.93% | |
| custom 5238036363516860569 | 12 | 5.94% | |
| custom 5238159040667735763 | 12 | 5.94% | |
| 👍 | 10 | 4.95% | |
| 😱 | 8 | 3.96% | |
| 🏆 | 7 | 3.47% | |
| 👨💻 | 7 | 3.47% | |
| 😁 | 6 | 2.97% | |
| ✍ | 5 | 2.48% | |
| 🤝 | 5 | 2.48% | |
| custom 5238155480139847478 | 2 | 0.99% | |
| 😎 | 2 | 0.99% | |
| 🤓 | 2 | 0.99% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 0.99% | |
| 😍 | 1 | 0.495% | |
| 🤪 | 1 | 0.495% |
Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 202 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 7 May 2026 to 9 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Как относитесь к техно-прогрессу?
The shares total 118%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
🌭1😁1
А кто-то от нее принципиально отказывается 👀 Набирает популярность тренд на сопротивление — friction-maxxing. Люди креативных индустрий отказываются от технологического прогресса в пользу кнопочных телефонов, отказа от ИИ и интернет-детокса. А все ради того, чтобы вернуть вдохновение от жизни и найти новые смыслы в работе и своей деятельности. Может, кто-то практикует этот тренд? #тренд #креативныеиндустрии
👍3custom 52380363635168605692🌭1👨💻1
Кто-то заказывал доставку?
😁4🤔2custom 52401448660416798252🌭1
Posted without readable text
🌭1🤪1😎1
А мы все знаем... Мы знаем, что многие участвовали в «Рейтинге Рунета»! Например, зачинатели «Креатива на Волге» — ивент-агентство «Мандариновая лиса» — даже получили первое место в срезе «Креативные агентства / События». Гордимся! Есть ли среди нас те, кто участвовал в рейтинге? Делитесь своими строчками и наградами 🏆 #рейтингрунета
🏆5custom 52399517428372154404🌭3👍2
У кого-то летом каникулы, а мы работаем...👀 Но мы свою работу любим и ищем в команду крутых специалистов! Ассистент продюсерской группы - искать супер-площадки для супер-ивентов - фиксировать все договоренности и коммуникацию с командой - быть супер-помощником в организации процессов - работать с документацией проектов Как мы работаем? Графический дизайнер - разрабатывать визуальный стиль событий - заниматься диз…
✍5👏4custom 52401448660416798254🤓2😎1
Уже видели новости об Antropic? Нейросети и так захватывают рынок креатива и труда, а тут даже основатели компании испугались стремительного обучения искусственного интеллекта. Да так сильно, что приостановили развитие последней модели на уровне целого государства 🌍 Ваши ставки, что будет с креативными индустриями через 5 лет? ИИ все-таки заменит креативщиков или мы прорвемся? Кто собирается бежать от нашествия ма…
custom 52381590406677357633🌭2👨💻2custom 52401448660416798252😁1
Мы ищем креатора в команду «Мандариновой лисы»! А именно, ищем человека, который: 🔴Умеет превращать клиентский бриф в концепцию, от которой хочется сказать «вот это да». 🔴Придумывает не просто темы — а истории, в которые хочется попасть. 🔴Может защитить идею перед клиентом так, чтобы он сам захотел её реализовать. Что нужно делать: 🟢Придумывать продающие концепции событий на основе брифа. 🟢Продумывать наполнение соб…
custom 52401448660416798259custom 52380363635168605697👨💻4
Друзья… Бронза Silver Mercury — НАША! Спасибо вам за поддержку! 💚🎉
🎉20👏11😱6🤝5🌭2
28 мая стартует 😇😇😇😇2️⃣6️⃣ — фестиваль медиаискусства в Казани 🟢 Уже несколько лет наблюдаем за тем, как весь город превращается в площадку для медиаискусства: уличные инсталляции, художники со всего мира — огромная точка сбора креатива и тех, кто его создает 🌀 В прошлом году мы поехали на НУР с подкастом «За компанию» и поговорили с теми, кто причастен к фестивалю: с продюсером Полиной Петровой, медиахудожником А…
🎉6👍4custom 52380363635168605693custom 52381590406677357632😍1
🟢Уже в эту пятницу (29 мая) мы узнаем результаты, ведь... МЫ В ШОРТ-ЛИСТЕ Silver Mercury! 🔥👀
custom 52399517428372154407🎉5👏5🌭1👍1
Ура?
The shares total 175%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
🎉4🌭2🏆2👏2
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @createonvolga. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Как относитесь к техно-прогрессу?
The shares total 118%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Ура?
The shares total 175%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Как ваша креативная жизнь связана с радио?
The shares total 112%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 7 May 2026 to 9 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Креатив на Волге — хакатон и фестиваль креативных индустрий в Самаре” (@createonvolga), 1,092 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/createonvolga.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.