TxFlow is running its first campaign with prizes paid in USDC All rewards in previous campaigns were paid in fee credits, which cut farming costs but couldn't be withdrawn, so this one actually matters Assuming the rewards and leaderboard stay roughly the same as last campaign, the estimated average return is around 15%, and prize-winning positions will start at $1M in volume For those who put off farming TxFlow, …

Channel
Crypp Alpha
@cryppinfluence
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
6,459subscribers
-264 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001790573287 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cryppinfluence |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 18 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cryppinfluence |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 60% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Oct 2026, 02:50 | 6,459 | -4 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 05:40 | 6,463 | -20 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 06:19 | 6,483 | -49 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 11:02 | 6,532 | -25 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 22:39 | 6,557 | -18 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 03:18 | 6,575 | -17 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 04:41 | 6,592 | -15 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 05:58 | 6,607 | -17 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 11:12 | 6,624 | -8 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 17:55 | 6,632 | -13 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 15:54 | 6,645 | -11 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 19:37 | 6,656 | -17 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 07:19 | 6,673 | -13 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 21:58 | 6,686 | -19 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 11:35 | 6,705 | -10 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 08:43 | 6,715 | -8 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:00 | 6,723 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:57 | 6,723 | first reading |
Engagement
25 posts held, back to 31 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 25 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 1m 25s
- Average length
- 1m 25s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
11 reactions across 3 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ✍ | 5 | 45.5% | |
| ❤ | 5 | 45.5% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 9.09% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 31 March 2026 to 18 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Jumped into TxFlow pretty good tho I have a +20% position from ETH long and still keeping it Some of referrals joined already generated wild volume in 1 day Who didn't join yet, there are some reward campaign for $50 off on fees for the new members joined using my code https://app.txflow.com/r/TXCRYPP
Alert for those farming perps (not a promo) I received an invite code for TxFlow, a perp launched by an experienced team that shot up to 24th place in terms of volume among perps in just one month The platform is currently invite-only, so there are only 50 slots available (and the number is already decreasing) https://app.txflow.com/r/TXCRYPP
Perps list I'm following for https://x.com/cryppinfluence/status/2086391662750642394
Nansen team reached out to me and asked me to tell you something They’ll be running an event with a $1M prize pool for another 2 weeks, and there are so few participants that 1 out of every 3 wins a USDC prize A few months ago, I personally spent about $500 on fees to reach the Ice tier; with this current campaign, there’s a chance to recoup some or even all of those costs Having spoken with many teams, it feels l…
Hi, remember me? We just dropped new version of Sweep and if you tried previous one I'd love to hear your experience about the update. If you have never Sweeped this is your chance to touch the revolutionary product in the decentralized exchanges niche https://x.com/cryppinfluence/status/2074942068456067285
❤1😁1
You're paying for other people's AI subscriptions - and here's how not to do it https://x.com/cryppinfluence/status/2066871642047799713
U.S banned the smartest AI model (Claude Fable 5), more about it below https://x.com/cryppinfluence/status/2065749931843870763
FREE Claude Code analogue by Xiaomi just dropped https://x.com/cryppinfluence/status/2065066466638954591
Article on Kimi Work and how to create an autonomous agent that replaces claude cowork for FREE https://x.com/cryppinfluence/status/2064694791602888893
CLAUDE JUST FINALLY RELEASED MYTHOS https://x.com/cryppinfluence/status/2064396052044648737 https://x.com/cryppinfluence/status/2064396052044648737 https://x.com/cryppinfluence/status/2064396052044648737
Article on how to use Odysseus - AI workspace created by PewDiePie (top 1 repository on star-history.com rn by the way) https://x.com/cryppinfluence/status/2063296132541816842
Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @cryppinfluence. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Should I post not crypto related content here (AI, startups, etc.)
- Post everything65%
- Crypto only35%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 31 March 2026 to 18 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@deltadegen · 19,679
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 29 September 2026
@masonsalpha · 26,224
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 12 September 2026
@ChainMindAlpha · 38,078
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 30 August 2026
@danny_crypton · 40,353
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 29 August 2026
@airdropofficial7 · 26,390
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 11 September 2026
@rektfencer_threads · 76,260
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 19 August 2026
@bloomstarbms · 24,948
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 14 September 2026
@Alpha_Updates · 18,911
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 3 October 2026
@HBQuarters · 25,312
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 September 2026
@ChasetheChallenge · 19,127
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 2 October 2026
@AirdropAdventureYT · 21,880
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 21 September 2026
@monad_xyz · 37,580
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 31 August 2026
@WGTDAO · 22,035
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 20 September 2026
@WimarX · 40,901
Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 29 August 2026
This channel appears in 14 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Crypp Alpha” (@cryppinfluence), 6,459 subscribers as measured 15 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryppinfluence.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.