Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ChainMind⛓🧠

Channel

ChainMind⛓🧠

@ChainMindAlpha

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

38,078subscribers

-2,465 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001648967831
TypeChannel
Username@ChainMindAlpha
Descriptionhttps://twitter.com/0xChainMind
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 October 2026
Measurements held39
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/ChainMindAlpha

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

38,07840,54339,310.57 August 2026 — 40,543 subscribers8 August 2026 — 40,507 subscribers9 August 2026 — 40,470 subscribers10 August 2026 — 40,442 subscribers11 August 2026 — 40,410 subscribers12 August 2026 — 40,369 subscribers13 August 2026 — 40,339 subscribers14 August 2026 — 40,280 subscribers16 August 2026 — 40,218 subscribers17 August 2026 — 40,176 subscribers18 August 2026 — 40,139 subscribers19 August 2026 — 40,094 subscribers20 August 2026 — 40,080 subscribers21 August 2026 — 40,034 subscribers23 August 2026 — 40,058 subscribers24 August 2026 — 40,008 subscribers26 August 2026 — 39,960 subscribers26 August 2026 — 39,924 subscribers27 August 2026 — 39,893 subscribers28 August 2026 — 39,853 subscribers30 August 2026 — 39,817 subscribers31 August 2026 — 39,767 subscribers1 September 2026 — 39,716 subscribers2 September 2026 — 39,671 subscribers3 September 2026 — 39,629 subscribers5 September 2026 — 39,560 subscribers8 September 2026 — 39,433 subscribers11 September 2026 — 39,335 subscribers13 September 2026 — 39,261 subscribers14 September 2026 — 39,178 subscribers16 September 2026 — 39,110 subscribers18 September 2026 — 39,035 subscribers25 September 2026 — 38,850 subscribers3 October 2026 — 38,535 subscribers8 October 2026 — 38,392 subscribers12 October 2026 — 38,240 subscribers14 October 2026 — 38,139 subscribers15 October 2026 — 38,100 subscribers16 October 2026 — 38,078 subscribers7 August 202616 October 2026
39 measurements spanning 70 days, net -2,465. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 37,708–40,913 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 39
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Oct 2026, 07:1938,078-22
15 Oct 2026, 10:2938,100-39
14 Oct 2026, 11:0038,139-101
12 Oct 2026, 21:1938,240-152
8 Oct 2026, 06:2038,392-143
3 Oct 2026, 20:1638,535-315
25 Sept 2026, 02:5938,850-185
18 Sept 2026, 21:3839,035-75
16 Sept 2026, 10:2239,110-68
14 Sept 2026, 14:3939,178-83
13 Sept 2026, 04:1739,261-74
11 Sept 2026, 03:3639,335-98
8 Sept 2026, 07:5939,433-127
5 Sept 2026, 00:2139,560-69
3 Sept 2026, 06:3639,629-42
2 Sept 2026, 03:0639,671-45
1 Sept 2026, 03:0939,716-51
31 Aug 2026, 02:5239,767-50
30 Aug 2026, 01:3339,817-36
28 Aug 2026, 22:1539,853first reading

Engagement

103 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 131 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.74%
avg views ÷ 38,078 subscribers
Avg views / post
662
33 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.17%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
33
of 103 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 October 2026
Posts held103 (26 July 2026 – 14 October 2026)
Views total21,839
Reactions total255
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken16 Oct 2026, 17:06 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,220
Videos
≈189
Links
≈1,280

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 16 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
30m 56s
Average length
23s

Measured directly from 80 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

786 reactions across 102 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤24230.8%
👍24030.5%
🔥20426.0%
👏283.56%
😍222.80%
🥰212.67%
🤔101.27%
😱70.891%
🥱40.509%
❤‍🔥30.382%
🥴20.254%
👌10.127%
😁10.127%
🤯10.127%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 102 of the 103 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 786 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 103 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 14 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

14 Oct 2026, 11:41 UTC350 views8 reactionsread 16 October 2026
Video

$ETH Do you see the pattern? https://x.com/0xChainMind/status/2110328373176127597

❤4👍3🔥1

11 Oct 2026, 17:54 UTC535 views3 reactionsread 16 October 2026
Video

$BTC Spot demand back to August levels while price holds 84K That's not looking good https://x.com/0xChainMind/status/2109308143721168944

❤2👍1

11 Oct 2026, 17:29 UTC497 views5 reactionsread 16 October 2026
Video

I will say it one more time: You are not ready for what’s coming… $BTC https://x.com/0xChainMind/status/2109277923631092038

👍3❤1🔥1

8 Oct 2026, 23:09 UTC661 views3 reactionsread 16 October 2026
Video

Bear market is over, just accept it...$BTC https://x.com/0xChainMind/status/2108311761539719307

❤3

8 Oct 2026, 22:56 UTC572 views4 reactionsread 16 October 2026
Video

Current range looks almost identical to the one we broke out of a month ago Lows got swept first, late longs wiped, squeeze did the rest Same thing is setting up now...$BTC https://x.com/0xChainMind/status/2108278588612948338

❤4

8 Oct 2026, 22:30 UTC509 views7 reactionsread 16 October 2026
Video

$BTC: Bullish Cross $ETH :Bullish Cross Hard to be bearish here https://x.com/0xChainMind/status/2108247642081771562

❤2🔥2👍1🥴1😁1

7 Oct 2026, 17:53 UTC561 views6 reactionsread 16 October 2026
Video

My vision on $BTC here We lost 84K today but we're still stuck in the same range Most likely price goes to test 80K right now So let's see how it reacts there https://x.com/0xChainMind/status/2107886631638503723

❤3👍2🔥1

5 Oct 2026, 19:14 UTC632 views5 reactionsread 16 October 2026
Video

Interesting how $ETH is holding here We just closed the week at the highest level in 8 months Close above 2.8K now and the Macro BSL target at 3,450 opens up Everything hinges on holding this weekly close https://x.com/0xChainMind/status/2107187091109187826

👍2🤔2🔥1

4 Oct 2026, 19:43 UTC647 views5 reactionsread 16 October 2026
Video

History does tend to repeat itself... $BTC https://x.com/0xChainMind/status/2106832368036389124

❤3👍1🔥1

1 Oct 2026, 13:46 UTC933 views13 reactionsread 16 October 2026
Video

$BTC We might see another sweep of local lows but 88K remains main target right now Maybe that huge 75K cluster will become same unswept liquidity as it happened with 62K Let's see how it plays out https://x.com/0xChainMind/status/2105655066837582248

❤5👍4❤‍🔥2🔥1😍1

30 Sept 2026, 19:12 UTC807 views9 reactionsread 16 October 2026
Video

We are going lower... $BTC https://x.com/0xChainMind/status/2105346828635951524

❤4🔥3👍2

28 Sept 2026, 19:20 UTC800 views12 reactionsread 16 October 2026
Video

We're sandwiched between two liquidity clusters right now Likely we chop here a bit before the correction really starts But we must take that 70K liquidity before any real move Lets see how it plays out https://x.com/0xChainMind/status/2104615861537657302

❤6👍4👏1😍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 103 posts we hold for @ChainMindAlpha. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Rekt Fencer
@rektfencer_threads · 76,260
#1
Klarck Alpha
@klarck_alpha · 36,182
#2
DOGS Community
@dogs · 6,736,343
#3
Symbiote🕷
@kinoyg · 6,713
#4
Hanzo connector
@defi_hanzo · 6
#5
Delta Degen
@deltadegen · 19,679
#6
0xNobler
@CryptoNobler · 49,260
#7
Notcoin Community
@notcoin · 8,242,225
#8
🅰️ Wacy Time
@AW_Time · 11,893
#9
JetStart Alpha ✈️
@start_threads · 8,009
#10
Yescoin
@theyescoin · 5,419,248
#11
MIDAS ALPHA
@MidasAlpha · 5,319
#12
Danny Crypton
@danny_crypton · 40,353
#13
Gremlinz
@gremlinz1 · 15,762
#14
Iced's House of Degeneracy
@houseofdegeneracy · 36,929
#15
Alpha Batcher
@AlphaBatcher · 7,815
#16
KingWilliamDefi
@William_Alpha · 4,047
#17
Atlas path
@AtlasPath · 32,126
#18
MetaZone - GIVEAWAYS 🚨
@metazoneofficial · 541,331
#19
Atoms Research
@atoms_research · 16,645
#20
Crypto Farm 🌾
@airdrop_farmi · 3,453
#21
shah’s trading journal
@shahlito · 31,311
#22
BLADE ALPHA
@BladeAlpha · 3,755
#23
Crypp Alpha
@cryppinfluence · 6,459
#24
Wimar.X
@WimarX · 40,901
#25
Tony Research
@TonyResearch · 4,680
#26
Solstice’s moonshots
@solsticesmoonshots · 27,088
#27
maison's diary 📝
@maisoncalls · 10,299
#28
Euni Calls 🦄
@eunicalls · 28,901
#29
Plutos
@plutos_research · 9,137
#30
💰💰 CryptoGG ❤️❤️
@cryptogg · 100,521
#31
$Bossman Calls
@BossmanCallsOfficial · 40,541
#32
Degen Seals
@DegenSeals · 34,118
#33
Defileo🔮 Alpha
@defileotwitter · 2,098
#34
⚡️FastLife - Airdrop
@FastLife0x · 9,773
#35
Wealth Craft by Cyrilxbt
@alphageeks · 13,070
#36
Blum: All Crypto – One App
@blumcrypto · 13,546,491
#37
Brozinkers
@brozinkers · 53,031
#38
Watcher Guru
@WatcherGuru · 628,747
#39
Catizen Announcement
@catizenann · 3,437,507
#40
CATS Community
@Cats_housewtf · 7,473,785
#41
OverDose Gems Calls
@overdose_gems_calls · 47,143
#42
HOT Updates
@hotonnear · 4,475,994
#43
Kuch (vibecoding arc)
@thekuchh · 3,979
#44
Pow's Gem Calls
@PowsGemCalls · 112,063
#45
Ram's Gems Calls ✨
@ramcalls · 40,133
#46
GOATS Channel
@realgoats_channel · 4,435,240
#47
Gambles 🎲 MadApes
@mad_apes_gambles · 100,860
#48
Alpha Ape Group 🦧 💎
@alpha_smartApe · 4,479
#49
Trending Apps
@trendingapps · 3,676,887
#50
Alpha updates. 🪓
@Alpha_Updates · 18,911
#51
eezzy’s journal
@eezzyjournal · 40,496
#52
Mrpunk Cooks
@cryptotalkwithfrog · 36,682
#53
Bitget Wallet Announcements
@Bitget_Wallet_Announcement · 3,745,059
#54
Pranjal | Airdrop Adventure 🧭
@AirdropAdventureYT · 21,880
#55
CryptoCapo TG
@CryptoCapoTG · 116,582
#56
@TRENDING (ETH / SOL)
@trending · 466,651
#57
Binance Announcements
@binance_announcements · 3,316,375
#58
CryptoRank Analytics
@cryptoranknews · 646,928
#59
Valhalla
@rasgardValhalla · 5,264
#60
FAYCY ALPHA
@faycyalpha · 4,402
#61
Airdrop Official 🍥
@airdropofficial7 · 26,390
#62
Sugar Calls
@sugarydick · 33,335
#63
Insider Calls
@inside_calls · 25,082
#64
andrewmoh - alpha male energy
@AM_insights · 2,938
#65
GA Crypto
@GaCryptOfficial · 36,775
#66
Ralph’s Call
@ralphscall · 31,939
#67
$CLOUT | SOL MEMECOIN
@CloutCoinSol · 931,053
#68
FareaNFts
@FareaNFts · 12,775
#69
zucl1ck 🦥
@zuclick · 2,305
#70
Defizard Threads | DT
@thedefiwizard · 5,278
#71
ONUS Announcements (English)
@onus_globalchannel · 1,574,390
#72
@FINDERTRENDING 💎
@findertrending · 26,827
#73
Catfish Calls by Poe
@CatfishcallsbyPoe · 35,311
#74
BANANA SOL Deployer
@bananadeployerSOL · 6,954
#75

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 30 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Klarck Alpha
@klarck_alpha · 36,182
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 31 August 2026
Rekt Fencer
@rektfencer_threads · 76,260
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 19 August 2026
Delta Degen
@deltadegen · 19,679
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 29 September 2026
Atlas path
@AtlasPath · 32,126
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 4 September 2026
Danny Crypton
@danny_crypton · 40,353
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 29 August 2026
0xNobler
@CryptoNobler · 49,260
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 25 August 2026
IONIC XBT
@theionicxbtt · 23,203
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 18 September 2026
Arbitrage Scanner (official)
@arbitragescanner_eng · 19,682
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 30 September 2026
Wimar.X
@WimarX · 40,901
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 29 August 2026
Masons Alpha
@masonsalpha · 26,224
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 12 September 2026
Crypto Mason
@cryptomasun · 28,681
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 8 September 2026
DATADIKDASMEN.COM
@datadikdasmen · 60,518
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 27 August 2026
Insider Calls
@inside_calls · 25,082
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 14 September 2026
Milady
@miladymemecoinchannel · 21,408
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 21 September 2026
GS Memecoins (Public)
@degenwar · 23,164
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 17 September 2026
Ash Crypto
@AshCryptoTG · 59,047
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 22 August 2026
Alpha updates. 🪓
@Alpha_Updates · 18,911
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 3 October 2026
AirdropAlert-com | Crypto Airdrops for Everyone
@airdrop_alert_dot_com · 207,699
Telegram ranks this channel #87 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 20 August 2026

This channel appears in 18 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ChainMind⛓🧠” (@ChainMindAlpha), 38,078 subscribers as measured 16 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ChainMindAlpha.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.