Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Gremlinz

Channel

Gremlinz

@gremlinz1

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

16,240subscribers

-343 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001678971501
TypeChannel
Username@gremlinz1
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 September 2026
Measurements held29
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/gremlinz1

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

16,24016,58316,411.55 August 2026 — 16,583 subscribers6 August 2026 — 16,583 subscribers6 August 2026 — 16,573 subscribers7 August 2026 — 16,563 subscribers8 August 2026 — 16,555 subscribers9 August 2026 — 16,546 subscribers11 August 2026 — 16,529 subscribers11 August 2026 — 16,520 subscribers13 August 2026 — 16,510 subscribers14 August 2026 — 16,492 subscribers15 August 2026 — 16,471 subscribers16 August 2026 — 16,458 subscribers17 August 2026 — 16,442 subscribers19 August 2026 — 16,424 subscribers20 August 2026 — 16,413 subscribers21 August 2026 — 16,395 subscribers22 August 2026 — 16,386 subscribers24 August 2026 — 16,368 subscribers25 August 2026 — 16,357 subscribers26 August 2026 — 16,340 subscribers27 August 2026 — 16,341 subscribers28 August 2026 — 16,337 subscribers29 August 2026 — 16,320 subscribers30 August 2026 — 16,310 subscribers31 August 2026 — 16,302 subscribers1 September 2026 — 16,295 subscribers2 September 2026 — 16,280 subscribers3 September 2026 — 16,258 subscribers5 September 2026 — 16,240 subscribers5 August 20265 September 2026
29 measurements spanning 31 days, net -343. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,189–16,634 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 29
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Sept 2026, 20:3716,240-18
3 Sept 2026, 19:5616,258-22
2 Sept 2026, 11:3216,280-15
1 Sept 2026, 12:1316,295-7
31 Aug 2026, 11:2516,302-8
30 Aug 2026, 13:2416,310-10
29 Aug 2026, 09:5916,320-17
28 Aug 2026, 09:0416,337-4
27 Aug 2026, 06:1416,341+1
26 Aug 2026, 09:0616,340-17
25 Aug 2026, 07:5216,357-11
24 Aug 2026, 06:3916,368-18
22 Aug 2026, 14:3516,386-9
21 Aug 2026, 04:0216,395-18
20 Aug 2026, 03:5516,413-11
19 Aug 2026, 03:0316,424-18
17 Aug 2026, 23:5516,442-16
16 Aug 2026, 22:1716,458-13
15 Aug 2026, 19:0416,471-21
14 Aug 2026, 09:5816,492first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 14 August 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 21 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 38s
Average length
25s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

289 reactions across 20 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
14750.9%
🔥8730.1%
👍5017.3%
🐳31.04%
💯10.346%
🙏10.346%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 289 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 14 August 2025 to 10 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Jun 2026, 17:56 UTC≈1,540 views19 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Video

My base case for the rest of 2026 June: Range 60k/68k July: Lower high 74k August: Lower low 50k September: Range 50k/60k October: Tightening range November: Bottom 45k December: Reversal January: Grind higher

🔥144🙏1

15 Mar 2026, 11:03 UTC≈3,080 views19 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

You can call it a conspiracy, but... From 2017 high to 2021 high: 1430 days From 2021 high to 2025 high: 1431 days From 2017 high to bottom: 365 days From 2021 high to bottom: 365 days New cycle bottom: in 205 days New cycle high: in 1276 days Whether you like it or not, we still follow the $BTC 4-year cycle

14🔥5

9 Mar 2026, 16:50 UTC≈2,760 views19 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

The next 120 days will matter more than last 3 years Oil at $100 today. First time in 4 years. What followed last time: Stocks: -30% into a 9-month bear $BTC: -60% into a 8-month bear Winter is coming

16🔥3

6 Mar 2026, 16:07 UTC≈2,670 views7 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

🚨 It's happening again $BTC reacts to war the exact same way Russia/Ukraine = Iran/United States Day 1: Panic nuke (✔) Weeks 1-3: Expansion (In progress) Month 2: The actual nuke (Loading...) We might be ahead of schedule...

5🔥2

14 Jan 2026, 11:32 UTC≈3,390 views15 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

$BTC $100k is the magnet After 54 days of chop, breakout this week is highest odds - Rallying on work days - Spot bid is leading - ETFs are buying

6👍6🔥3

8 Jan 2026, 12:06 UTC≈3,420 views8 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Privacy coins 2026 = AI coins 2024 When a16z, Vitalik, Balaji all point in the same direction, you don't ignore it You already know the bluechips $ZEC, $XMR But the narrative is bigger than that now Here're a few I'm keeping my eye on: 1. Zama: Fully Homomorphic Encryption (FHE). Run smart contracts on data while it’s encrypted. Nodes compute blindly; inputs remain hidden. 2. Aztec: ETH ZK-Rollup using Noir. En

4👍4

6 Jan 2026, 14:02 UTC≈2,540 views5 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Altseason for stocks has started Russell 2000 is outperforming SPX for the first time in 18 months Would be a shame if crypto was next... https://x.com/0x_gremlin/status/2008538699529871496

4👍1

5 Jan 2026, 11:30 UTC≈2,480 views7 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

$BTC It’s time PA looks way better No rejection at $90k Likely get the standard early week scam down Likely It won't matter this time https://x.com/0x_gremlin/status/2008132830673674747

5🔥2

5 Dec 2025, 12:09 UTC≈3,840 views17 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

2026 Script (If Oct 6th was the top) > Bull trap happening rn > Slow bleed Q1 2026 > Breakdown Q2 2026 > Sideways Q3 2026 > Final flush Q3/Q4 2026 > Accumulation H1 2027 > Recovery H2 2027 https://x.com/0x_gremlin/status/1996913596228686223

👍13🔥3🐳1

21 Nov 2025, 09:35 UTC≈4,140 views12 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Bottom is close We’ve had a 34% pullback It’s only happened twice in 2 years And both times marked the bottom https://x.com/0x_gremlin/status/1991801863738655152

7🔥4💯1

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @gremlinz1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ChainMind⛓🧠
@ChainMindAlpha · 39,433
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 30 August 2026
Rekt Fencer
@rektfencer_threads · 78,313
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 19 August 2026
Klarck Alpha
@klarck_alpha · 37,444
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 31 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Gremlinz” (@gremlinz1), 16,240 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gremlinz1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.