Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Symbiote🕷

Channel

Symbiote🕷

@kinoyg

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,854subscribers

-192 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001660941553
TypeChannel
Username@kinoyg
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/kinoyg

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

6,8547,0466,9507 August 2026 — 7,046 subscribers8 August 2026 — 7,037 subscribers11 August 2026 — 7,025 subscribers14 August 2026 — 7,007 subscribers17 August 2026 — 6,989 subscribers20 August 2026 — 6,974 subscribers24 August 2026 — 6,956 subscribers27 August 2026 — 6,943 subscribers31 August 2026 — 6,923 subscribers2 September 2026 — 6,908 subscribers7 September 2026 — 6,887 subscribers12 September 2026 — 6,870 subscribers15 September 2026 — 6,854 subscribers7 August 202615 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 39 days, net -192. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,825–7,075 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 07:006,854-16
12 Sept 2026, 02:166,870-17
7 Sept 2026, 17:366,887-21
2 Sept 2026, 17:386,908-15
31 Aug 2026, 01:056,923-20
27 Aug 2026, 17:046,943-13
24 Aug 2026, 10:136,956-18
20 Aug 2026, 20:576,974-15
17 Aug 2026, 14:196,989-18
14 Aug 2026, 09:397,007-18
11 Aug 2026, 11:187,025-12
8 Aug 2026, 10:167,037-9
7 Aug 2026, 11:457,046first reading

Engagement

41 posts held, back to 23 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 41 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
16m 28s
Average length
26s

Measured directly from 38 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

358 reactions across 40 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
13337.2%
🔥11933.2%
🤔10529.3%
🏆10.279%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 40 of the 41 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 358 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 41 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 19 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 41 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @kinoyg. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 41 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 July 2026 to 19 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

19 Aug 2026, 20:18 UTC92 views11 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Video

It was obvious for $BTC to take mFVG at ~69K eventually, now we're retesting bear market resistance band That's where we reject and go lower https://x.com/cryptosymbiiote/status/2090138700009075052

4🔥4🤔3

17 Aug 2026, 22:27 UTC216 views6 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Video

Compression -> Deviation -> Dump -> Repeat $BTC https://x.com/cryptosymbiiote/status/2089463770074550399

2🔥2🤔2

17 Aug 2026, 22:26 UTC200 views6 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Video

Interesting divergence here... $BTC Open interest is at a 1-year breakout while price remains inside same compressed range Wouldn't be surprised to see a leverage flush into compression before the move toward mFVG above https://x.com/cryptosymbiiote/status/2089411950073528637

2🔥2🤔2

17 Aug 2026, 13:37 UTC195 views6 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Video

$BTC POC is sitting at 64K with volume increasing at highs of this 2-month compressed range That tells us we're seeing acceptance near range highs Which on LTF points to a retest of mFVG, with or without taking OB or compression below first https://x.com/cryptosymbiiote/status/2089344533867745314

2🔥2🤔2

16 Aug 2026, 22:29 UTC219 views9 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Video

We’ve just closed 5th $BTC weekly candle around the same weekly 200MA, all within a ~4% range This usually means a large liquidity sweep is coming https://x.com/cryptosymbiiote/status/2089114708540371240

3🔥3🤔3

15 Aug 2026, 17:48 UTC258 views7 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Video

For those bottom-is-in thinkers.. $BTC If you're waiting for Q4 for bottom to come quietly, without any final flush and legacy market correction It's not a plan, it's just a comfortable bottom for you We're sitting at -50% from ATH, no fear, no capitulation, no "we are going to zero" sentiment, anywhere close to 2022 No macro bottom ever comes this easy At some point, S&P 500 must correct and if BTC is already t

🔥32🤔2

14 Aug 2026, 23:06 UTC249 views5 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Video

Decided to check LTF and saw we formed a bearish H&S pattern You all know what's coming next... $BTC Get ready for a further dump https://x.com/cryptosymbiiote/status/2088399460619501985

🔥2🤔21

14 Aug 2026, 17:55 UTC265 views6 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Video

$BTC From a purely structural standpoint, there's nothing bullish right now except monthly imbalance above We're just ranging and clearly targeting liquidity on both sides So after it happens there, it's just free fall https://x.com/cryptosymbiiote/status/2088322187891478985

🔥4🤔2

12 Aug 2026, 19:48 UTC302 views10 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Video

The final capitulation is coming. $BTC https://x.com/cryptosymbiiote/status/2087603792611082687

🔥62🤔2

12 Aug 2026, 12:31 UTC320 views5 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Video

2 of 2 last CPIs got us a ~7% $BTC pump We would have third one today Wondering if we repeat it https://x.com/cryptosymbiiote/status/2087516084010176686

🔥2🤔21

10 Aug 2026, 22:10 UTC370 views10 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Video

It was always obvious in hindsight... $BTC People just don't want to believe it's happening And eventually, when everyone realizes it was playing out all along, it'll already be gone https://x.com/cryptosymbiiote/status/2086936467410968968

4🔥3🤔3

10 Aug 2026, 22:09 UTC316 views8 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Video

Are you still bullish... $BTC We didn't manage to flip the 65.3K weekly high, got rejected from it, and are now moving to test another pivot at 62.7K If this one fails too, I'd expect price to clear compression below That puts 59K-60K as next target https://x.com/cryptosymbiiote/status/2086878364279751153

4🔥2🤔2

Showing the 12 most recent of 41 posts we hold for @kinoyg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ChainMind⛓🧠
@ChainMindAlpha · 39,035
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 30 August 2026
Klarck Alpha
@klarck_alpha · 37,053
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 31 August 2026
0xNobler
@CryptoNobler · 50,291
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 25 August 2026
Rekt Fencer
@rektfencer_threads · 77,921
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 19 August 2026
Atlas path
@AtlasPath · 33,081
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 4 September 2026
Danny Crypton
@danny_crypton · 41,342
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 29 August 2026
Wimar.X
@WimarX · 41,875
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 29 August 2026
Insider Calls
@inside_calls · 25,082
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 14 September 2026

This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Symbiote🕷” (@kinoyg), 6,854 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kinoyg.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.