Channel
@crypto_molodezh
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,148subscribers
-16 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002085756398 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @crypto_molodezh |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/crypto_molodezh |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Sept 2026, 06:00 | 1,148 | -3 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 17:58 | 1,151 | -3 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 13:56 | 1,154 | -2 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 06:47 | 1,156 | -1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 10:27 | 1,157 | -1 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 18:14 | 1,158 | -6 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 14:55 | 1,164 | +1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 22:42 | 1,163 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:16 | 1,164 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:03 | 1,164 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 19 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
25 reactions across 10 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 7 | 28.0% | |
| 👍 | 6 | 24.0% | |
| 😡 | 4 | 16.0% | |
| 🎉 | 2 | 8.00% | |
| 👌 | 2 | 8.00% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 8.00% | |
| 🫡 | 2 | 8.00% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 25 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 19 March 2026 to 17 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Трамп будет продавать компаниям и банкам "самый быстрый доступ" (уже звучит смешно😅) к своим постам и постам влиятельных пользователей в своей соцсети Truth Social инсайдерская торговля тем, кто купит? у деда нет денег? скучно живет? вроде как все вместе, ведь какая выгода тем, кто увидит первый пост, мб возможность первым нажать кнопку? зачем он это делает, какие у вас мысли?
$100,000, вложенные в $ETH 8,5 лет назад, теперь стоят $130,000. $100,000, вложенные в SpaceX 3 дня назад, теперь стоят $160,000.
🫡2
Чисто сижу новости читаю🦧
😁3
Photo, posted without a caption
👍1
🦧🦧🦧
⚠️ Хакеры взломали криптомост Gravity Bridge: ущерб индустрии превысил $328 млн Злоумышленники получили доступ к контракту и вывели активы на $5,4 млн (USDC, WETH, USDT, PAXG) ➡️ Часть средств уже выведена через биржи, на кошельке хакера остается ~$4,2 млн в ETH ➡️ Валидаторы остановили работу сети, токен GRAV просел на 4% Это 8-й крупный взлом моста в 2026 году
🔥2
Вот это я понимаю польза от ИИ. Парень восстановил доступ к своему старому биткоин-кошельку с 5 BTC из 2015 года благодаря Claude. Годами не мог подобрать пароль и уже почти смирился с тем, что деньги потеряны навсегда. В итоге загрузил в Claude данные со своего старого студенческого компьютера, и ИИ помог найти правильную комбинацию. После этого доступ к кошельку восстановили и перевели все 5 BTC на новый адрес.…
👍3
Американские власти задержали военного, который выиграл $400 тыс., поставив на свержение Мадуро. По данным суда в Нью-Йорке, сержант спецназа Гэннон Ван Лайк использовал платформу Polymarket, имея доступ к закрытой информации по операции в Венесуэле. За несколько дней до событий он поставил $34 тыс. на исход, который считался маловероятным. После свержения Мадуро его прибыль составила 1242%.
🥂🥂🥂 Технологии уже нашли? Welcome to Crypto 🫡
🎉2
Шедевр🎉
Решил не ждать альсезон. Зафиксировал прибыль по всем перспективным альткоинам. Итого, хватило на два салата и лимонад.
😁4
🪙 Киты накопили 270 000 BTC за последние 30 дней — это крупнейшая волна с 2013 года Запасы BTC на биржах тем временем упали до минимального уровня с декабря 2017
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @crypto_molodezh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“⚡️Крипто Молодежь⚡️” (@crypto_molodezh), 1,148 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/crypto_molodezh.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.