Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Crypto Hunters

Channel

Crypto Hunters

@cryptohunters

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

112,336subscribers

+6,485 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001364138990
TypeChannel
Username@cryptohunters
DescriptionCrypto hunters covers all things crypto news. The channel aggregates news surrounding crypto analytics, politics, and market analysis. Advertising: @larycrypt
CreatedBetween 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live1 September 2026
Measurements held23
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 1 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/cryptohunters

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 89% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

102,152113,838107,9957 August 2026 — 105,851 subscribers8 August 2026 — 105,593 subscribers9 August 2026 — 104,931 subscribers10 August 2026 — 104,445 subscribers11 August 2026 — 104,114 subscribers12 August 2026 — 103,607 subscribers13 August 2026 — 103,111 subscribers14 August 2026 — 102,730 subscribers16 August 2026 — 102,152 subscribers17 August 2026 — 106,585 subscribers18 August 2026 — 106,304 subscribers19 August 2026 — 105,949 subscribers20 August 2026 — 105,521 subscribers21 August 2026 — 105,270 subscribers23 August 2026 — 104,768 subscribers25 August 2026 — 104,342 subscribers26 August 2026 — 104,063 subscribers27 August 2026 — 113,838 subscribers28 August 2026 — 113,642 subscribers29 August 2026 — 113,123 subscribers30 August 2026 — 112,685 subscribers31 August 2026 — 112,555 subscribers1 September 2026 — 112,336 subscribers112,3367 August 20261 September 2026
23 measurements spanning 25 days, net +6,485. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 100,399–115,591 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 23
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
1 Sept 2026, 11:55112,336-219
31 Aug 2026, 09:06112,555-130
30 Aug 2026, 10:45112,685-438
29 Aug 2026, 07:55113,123-519
28 Aug 2026, 07:34113,642-196
27 Aug 2026, 05:23113,838+9,775
26 Aug 2026, 01:48104,063-279
25 Aug 2026, 01:28104,342-426
23 Aug 2026, 11:52104,768-502
21 Aug 2026, 20:08105,270-251
20 Aug 2026, 13:46105,521-428
19 Aug 2026, 13:43105,949-355
18 Aug 2026, 15:03106,304-281
17 Aug 2026, 13:23106,585+4,433
16 Aug 2026, 07:47102,152-578
14 Aug 2026, 19:37102,730-381
13 Aug 2026, 12:46103,111-496
12 Aug 2026, 09:22103,607-507
11 Aug 2026, 06:38104,114-331
10 Aug 2026, 06:55104,445first reading

Engagement

27 posts held, back to 6 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
27.5%
avg views ÷ 112,336 subscribers
Avg views / post
30,900
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.92%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 27 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026
Posts held27 (6 April 20261 September 2026)
Views total247,050
Reactions total17,086
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken1 Sept 2026, 14:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
498
Videos
61
Links
587

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 1 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
53s
Average length
18s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

62,267 reactions across 27 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 13.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
8,44513.6%
🎉8,43213.5%
👍8,40613.5%
🔥8,33513.4%
🥰8,27313.3%
🤩8,16313.1%
😍5,5168.86%
💯5,4868.81%
👏6040.97%
🐳5560.893%
🙏510.082%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 27 of the 27 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 62,267 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 6 April 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Sept 2026, 13:46 UTC≈1,950 views569 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

Everyone’s apeing CRT NFTs on HyperEVM 😄 Meanwhile you can tokenize an AI that actually trades the perps those screens are staring at. NAV-backed. Public reasoning. 75% fees to the creator. The floor is a terminal. The bag is a strategy. 🔗 Official Links: 🌐 https://perpgame.xyz ✖️ https://x.com/PerpGame 🐙 https://github.com/perpgame 🎮 https://discord.gg/a2rqGmxBHE

90👍84🎉83🤩72😍68🔥61💯57🥰54

29 Aug 2026, 13:28 UTC≈35,900 views2,000 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

🚨Metaplanet Moves $108M in Bitcoin to Coinbase Prime, Selloff Incoming? ➡ Read More

💯273🎉266🤩261🥰251😍242🔥240235👍232

24 Aug 2026, 21:43 UTC≈35,800 views2,310 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

₿ Bitcoin Posts Largest-Ever Weekly Dollar Gain 📌 Bitcoin added $14,264 in a single week to close at $77,387 — its largest dollar-denominated weekly gain on record, and a 22.7% move in seven days. Strive CEO Matt Cole is calling the next cycle potentially the strongest yet, citing Bitcoin's performance against both the dollar and gold as the basis for his optimism. 🚀 Cycle predictions are easy to make and hard to v

305🔥303🎉298🤩290🥰285👍281😍278💯270

22 Aug 2026, 14:33 UTC≈34,200 views2,827 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

🚨Breaking: China’s DeepSeek Reveals New AI Model To Rival Anthropic Amid $86B IPO Buzz ➡ Read More

🥰384😍374🤩362🎉348💯347🔥338337👍337

17 Aug 2026, 21:26 UTC≈27,800 views113 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

⚖️ SEC Pulls Crypto Regulation Vote — No Safe Harbor Yet 🔥 The SEC has canceled its scheduled vote on Regulation Crypto, leaving token issuers and holders exactly where they started: under existing securities rules, with no formal safe harbor in sight. 📌 No rescheduled date has been announced. For an industry that's been waiting years for regulatory clarity, it's another non-event dressed up as news — which, at thi

👍2221🤩20🔥18🎉14🥰13😍3💯2

12 Aug 2026, 21:05 UTC≈42,500 views4,632 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

🐂 Could the 2026 midterms mark another Bitcoin turning point? 🔥 An interesting pattern is making the rounds on X: in 2014, 2018, and 2022, U.S. midterm election years coincided with the formation of a final Bitcoin bear trap before a powerful bullish trend began. In each case, BTC subsequently entered a major uptrend lasting roughly 994 days (142 weeks). 🇺🇸 The next U.S. midterm elections are scheduled for Novembe

🥰626🎉610👍607602😍600💯542🤩526🔥519

8 Aug 2026, 14:00 UTC≈34,700 views2,323 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

🚨CFTC Warns Polymarket, Kalshi Against American-Style Gambling Odds Amid State Scrutiny ➡ Read More

🤩310👍304💯294🥰288🔥287😍284279🎉277

5 Aug 2026, 21:19 UTC≈34,200 views2,312 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

🚨 Is Strategy selling Bitcoin again? 👀 Wallets linked to Strategy have transferred 1,030 BTC (worth approximately $66.1M) just two hours ago, sparking fresh speculation about whether the company is offloading part of its holdings. 📌 The transfer follows previous similar movements, leading some traders to question if Michael Saylor's firm is preparing another sale. However, it's important to note that large wallet t

💯306🔥306🥰303😍291🎉284👍277273🤩272

1 Aug 2026, 22:24 UTC≈33,600 views2,330 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

🚨AG Nominee Blanche Faces Senate Vote as CLARITY Act Ethics Fight Hinges on DOJ Power ➡ Read More

🔥317298😍294🥰287👍285💯285🎉282🤩282

29 Jul 2026, 21:37 UTC≈33,500 views2,321 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

🐻 The crypto bear market continues to claim more victims 📣 Since the beginning of 2026, more than 100 crypto projects have announced their closure, highlighting the ongoing pressure across the industry. 🚀 The wave has affected nearly every sector—from long-established exchanges to DeFi protocols—as lower trading activity, tighter funding conditions, and declining user engagement continue to take their toll. ✔️ Bea

🤩302300💯294🥰294👍293😍286🎉283🔥269

21 Jul 2026, 22:22 UTC≈36,300 views2,437 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Video

⚽️ New Market Indicator Just Dropped: The FIFA World Cup Crypto Twitter has found a new "indicator"—the World Cup. Bitcoin bottomed near $16K during the 2022 Qatar World Cup, right before the current bull cycle began. Now that another tournament has ended, some traders are hoping history repeats itself. There's one important difference, though. In 2022, the market had just endured the FTX collapse and a wave of ba

🔥330💯320🥰314310🎉304👍292😍284🤩283

13 Jul 2026, 18:56 UTC≈39,800 views2,323 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

$WLD ran +130% in 30 days on the identity narrative. That kind of move makes you look at the whole sector differently. So I spent the week researching identity plays. The one I keep coming back to: $CCD. • World verifies humans with the Orb and World ID • Concordium uses zero-knowledge proofs to verify identity attributes and agent accountability for humans and AI agents • Agent Registry live since May 2026. Verif

🎉314😍302🔥301👍296🤩289285💯280🥰256

Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @cryptohunters. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Crypto Hunters” (@cryptohunters), 112,336 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptohunters.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.