Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Concordium News

Channel

Concordium News

@ConcordiumNews

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,148subscribers

-1,247 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001690648215
TypeChannel
Username@ConcordiumNews
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held21
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ConcordiumNews

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

9,14810,3959,771.56 August 2026 — 10,395 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,382 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,378 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,368 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,362 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,336 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,328 subscribers13 August 2026 — 10,285 subscribers14 August 2026 — 10,200 subscribers16 August 2026 — 10,120 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,090 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10,016 subscribers19 August 2026 — 9,984 subscribers23 August 2026 — 9,852 subscribers26 August 2026 — 9,592 subscribers29 August 2026 — 9,434 subscribers2 September 2026 — 9,344 subscribers6 September 2026 — 9,295 subscribers11 September 2026 — 9,228 subscribers14 September 2026 — 9,191 subscribers18 September 2026 — 9,148 subscribers6 August 202618 September 2026
21 measurements spanning 44 days, net -1,247. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,961–10,582 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 21
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 21:409,148-43
14 Sept 2026, 11:179,191-37
11 Sept 2026, 05:219,228-67
6 Sept 2026, 00:599,295-49
2 Sept 2026, 05:539,344-90
29 Aug 2026, 22:359,434-158
26 Aug 2026, 15:249,592-260
23 Aug 2026, 10:069,852-132
19 Aug 2026, 13:439,984-32
18 Aug 2026, 17:0410,016-74
17 Aug 2026, 14:3610,090-30
16 Aug 2026, 07:3410,120-80
14 Aug 2026, 17:3910,200-85
13 Aug 2026, 06:5610,285-43
12 Aug 2026, 04:4610,328-8
11 Aug 2026, 02:2810,336-26
10 Aug 2026, 00:3010,362-6
9 Aug 2026, 03:5410,368-10
8 Aug 2026, 03:3110,378-4
7 Aug 2026, 04:0610,382first reading

Engagement

26 posts held, back to 23 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 36 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 26 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

578 reactions across 26 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍17530.3%
🔥11319.6%
❤‍🔥8314.4%
❤8013.8%
👏7212.5%
👌335.71%
⚡162.77%
🎉61.04%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 26 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 578 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 23 June 2026 to 25 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
131
across the posts below
Posts paid on
15
of 26 we hold a reading for · 58%
Most on one post
32
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ConcordiumNews. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 26 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 June 2026 to 25 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

25 Aug 2026, 09:28 UTC226 views14 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

💸 X Space Tomorrow Stablecoins are changing how money moves. AI agents could change who, or what, is making the payment. Tomorrow, our CGO Varun Kabra joins Graham Stone from Bitcoin.com to discuss the future of digital payments, wallets, AI agents and trust. Set your reminder 👇 🔗 https://x.com/concordium/status/2091923320593891329

👍12🎉1👏1

21 Aug 2026, 13:23 UTC384 views24 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Investors Can Now Check Concordium against Blockworks' Token Transparency Framework Concordium’s CCD disclosure is now live on Blockworks’ Token Transparency Framework. Of 76 B1 filings on the dashboard, only 26 are rated Complete. Concordium’s is one of them. Read the blog and share your thoughts 👇 https://x.com/concordium/status/2090790577294246074

👍16🔥6❤‍🔥2

20 Aug 2026, 12:12 UTC406 views12 reactions5 Starsread 29 August 2026

🔐 X Space Tomorrow AI agents don’t need malicious intent to become a security risk. Sometimes, they just need a goal and an insecure system. Tomorrow, Muslim Saadat and Andy Nelson join Bandit to discuss Security in the Age of AI Agents, guardrails, accountability and more. Set your reminder 👇 🔗 https://x.com/concordium/status/2090411261876146292

❤‍🔥10❤1👍1

18 Aug 2026, 13:12 UTC405 views24 reactions10 Starsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Concordium 🤝 Global FinReg 🔗 Read all about it here: https://x.com/concordium/status/2089700683574596050

❤18❤‍🔥4🔥2

12 Aug 2026, 18:43 UTC547 views20 reactionsread 29 August 2026

🎙 Live Session Tomorrow AI agents are learning how to pay. But who stands behind the payment? Tomorrow, Theo Bachmann and Andy Nelson will join Chris Jourdan for a live discussion on x402, AI agents, identity, and the next layer for agentic payments. Tune in and set your reminder 👇 🔗 https://x.com/concordium/status/2087596190020030626

👍13❤6🔥1

11 Aug 2026, 13:12 UTC489 views21 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Google Knows Which Agent Is Running. It Doesn’t Know Who Sent It. Google can prove which AI agent is running. But when that agent interacts outside its organisation, another question remains: Who stands behind it? We explore why runtime identity and accountability are two different layers of the AI agent stack. Read the blog & share your thoughts 👇 https://x.com/concordium/status/2087163851007807574

❤‍🔥18🔥2👏1

5 Aug 2026, 15:30 UTC659 views21 reactions6 Starsread 29 August 2026

🎙 X Space This Friday Yesterday, we explored what ERC-8004 solves and why discovery isn’t the same as accountability. This Friday, Theo Bachmann and Andy Nelson will join Banditxbt for a live discussion on AI agents, ERC-8004, privacy, accountability, and the next trust layer for agentic commerce. 🔗 Set your reminder here: https://x.com/Concordium/status/2085022611856392456

👏18❤2🔥1

4 Aug 2026, 13:08 UTC621 views12 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

ERC-8004 Solves Discovery. It Doesn't Solve Accountability. Here's the Difference. AI agents are getting identities. But identity alone doesn’t create trust. Our latest deep dive explores what ERC-8004 solves, what independent research has uncovered, and why discovery is still different from accountability. 🔗 Read more: https://x.com/concordium/status/2084626899628949662

👌8👍3❤1

29 Jul 2026, 15:33 UTC720 views20 reactions1 Starread 29 August 2026

Building The Agentic Economy Join us tomorrow for an X Space with Ledger! Our CTO, Peter Marirosans, will be joining Ledger for a discussion on what the agentic economy needs to scale securely. 👉 Set your reminder here: https://x.com/concordium/status/2082488941085913587

❤‍🔥15🔥5

28 Jul 2026, 13:17 UTC610 views16 reactions11 Starsread 29 August 2026
Photo

x402, Explained: How AI Agents Pay, What the Numbers Say, and the Identity Question It Leaves Open AI agents can finally pay for things on their own. That’s a huge milestone. But there’s one question the industry still hasn’t answered. Who’s behind the agent? Our latest deep dive explores how x402 works, what the adoption numbers actually show, and why payments alone aren’t enough. 🔗 Read more: https://x.com/co…

👏16

27 Jul 2026, 12:05 UTC581 views29 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Concordium Node 10.0.10 for Mainnet and Testnet has been released. This version fixes a bug where pending blocks with unknown parents got relayed to peers. 🔘 Download 🔘 Github

🔥19👍8❤2

23 Jul 2026, 13:07 UTC612 views16 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

A Morse Code Message Moved as Much as $200,000 Between Two AI Agents The most important AI security story isn’t about broken cryptography. It’s about missing accountability. A recent incident involving Grok and Bankr showed how an AI agent could be manipulated into moving assets worth up to $200,000 without breaking a single cryptographic guarantee. 🔗 Read the full article: https://x.com/concordium/status/208027…

👍14❤2

Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @ConcordiumNews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Casper Official Announcements
@casperofficialann · 35,808
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 1 September 2026
Расскажи!
@rasskazhi_channel · 30,875
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 23 here — alongside 22 others — read 6 September 2026
Kapkap Hub News
@Kapkaphub_ann · 388,369
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 2 September 2026
Portal to Bitcoin Announcements
@portaltobitcoin_announcements · 87,154
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 1 September 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Concordium News” (@ConcordiumNews), 9,148 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ConcordiumNews.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.