We're LIVE in 10 minutes! 🔴 How did a fake job interview turn into a $6.3B theft? @michaelsteuer and HalbornSecurity's @urruts break down the Binance hack. → https://x.com/i/spaces/1aWbJrgOkooQoE
❤4👍2
Signed Henry | Casper

Channel
@casperofficialann
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
34,102subscribers
-3,487 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001450318140 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @casperofficialann |
| Description | Official Announcement Channel of the Casper Network overseen by the Casper Association |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 61 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/casperofficialann |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 83% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Nov 2026, 13:56 | 34,102 | -43 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 15:46 | 34,145 | -56 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 15:57 | 34,201 | -21 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 16:44 | 34,222 | -38 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 18:31 | 34,260 | -31 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 18:37 | 34,291 | -38 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 20:55 | 34,329 | -46 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 17:46 | 34,375 | -37 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 18:18 | 34,412 | -33 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 15:50 | 34,445 | -42 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 15:06 | 34,487 | -17 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 16:57 | 34,504 | -28 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 14:06 | 34,532 | -48 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 12:54 | 34,580 | -40 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 13:38 | 34,620 | -64 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 03:57 | 34,684 | -33 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 00:58 | 34,717 | -46 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 22:18 | 34,763 | -44 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 23:19 | 34,807 | -34 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 21:05 | 34,841 | first reading |
37 posts held, back to 3 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 168 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 37 (3 July 2026 – 5 November 2026) |
| Views total | 6,034 |
| Reactions total | 77 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Nov 2026, 06:06 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
665 reactions across 36 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 411 | 61.8% | |
| ❤ | 176 | 26.5% | |
| 👏 | 46 | 6.92% | |
| 👍 | 32 | 4.81% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 36 of the 37 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 665 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 37 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 7 posts held from the last 30 days (14.3%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
We're LIVE in 10 minutes! 🔴 How did a fake job interview turn into a $6.3B theft? @michaelsteuer and HalbornSecurity's @urruts break down the Binance hack. → https://x.com/i/spaces/1aWbJrgOkooQoE
❤4👍2
Signed Henry | Casper
Join our X Space with @michaelsteuer and HalbornSecurity’s @urruts on what really happened in the Binance hack. 📅 Thursday, November 5th 🕐 1:00 PM ET 📌 Set a reminder
👏5👍2🔥1
Signed Henry | Casper
⏰ 20 minutes to go! Our CTO @michaelsteuer joins CryptoCharged for a free live webinar starting soon. Crypto taxes, tokenization, market analysis, and a look inside the new CryptoCharged research desk. Bring your questions! 🗓️ Today, October 29 Register 👇 tinyurl.com/CCwebinar102926
👏5
Signed Henry | Casper
Interact with Contracts is live on CSPR.live (beta) You can now read and call smart contract entry points directly from any Contract Package page. No CLI, no scripts. 🟣 READ: check on-chain state for free 🔴 WRITE: execute entry points, sign with Casper Wallet ⛽ Gas history to help you set the right payment ✅ Transaction status shown right in the form 🛡️ Casper is permissionless. Only interact with contracts you kn…
❤8
Signed Henry | Casper
You can now swap directly in Casper Wallet! 🔄 Powered by cspr.trade, native swaps are live on Android, Chrome, Firefox and Edge. On iOS, open cspr.trade in the in-app browser to swap. There’s more in the update 👈 Update your wallet to get started.
🔥12
Signed Henry | Casper
Old payments are back, and they’re coming for you 🪦 The Casper Graveyard is LIVE! Survive the night, bank your coins, and finish in the top 10 to win $100 in CSPR. → graveyard.casper.network
👏10❤7🔥3
Signed Henry | Casper
What did Casper ship in Q3, and what’s next for Q4? Our President & CTO @michaelsteuer returns to CryptoCharged tomorrow, Thursday, October 15, to discuss the latest upgrades and what’s ahead for Casper. Make sure you don’t miss it. 👇 https://x.com/CryptoCharged/status/2109713193899860181
❤18
Signed Henry | Casper
Q3 2026 recap is in 📊 Three months ago, our CTO Michael Steuer set 7 commitments for Q3. The result: seven for seven, and then some. 🔥 Highlights: ✅ Agentic Buildathon wrapped — Faktura took first ✅ EVM DevNet is live with Uniswap, Morpho and MetaMask ✅ Casper in the official x402 SDK + first commercial partner ✅ ERC-3643 compliant security tokens: live T-REX integration ✅ Kraken spot and perps listing ✅ Active in…
🔥15❤4👍1
Signed Henry | Casper
You asked for a way to renew your CSPR.name before it expires. Now you can. 🙌 Early renewal is live, thanks to requests from the Casper community. No need to wait until your name expires to renew it. Keep the feedback coming! cspr.name/my-names
🔥10❤2
Signed Henry | Casper
Buildathon winners are in 🏆 Faktura takes first, with nine more teams placing. Congrats! Thanks to our judges from Halborn Security, NOWNodes, ChainGPT and AlliumLabs, Advanced AI Society. Full results 👑 Congrats to all the winners! Even if you weren't among the winners this time, you can still win big time by joining the Casper Forward program, designed to provide support to all developers and teams who want to…
🔥16❤5
Signed Henry | Casper
📢 Make your voice heard on crypto policy 🏛 The Senate votes on the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act on September 15 Blockchain Association built a tool where you can write directly to your senators (and add your name to the coalition letter to Senate leadership) in just a two minutes. 📝 How to do it (U.S. citizens & residents): 1. Go to https://www.clarityforamerica.com 2. Fill in the template and choose the tone …
🔥14❤3👍1
Signed Henry | Casper
New X spaces link: https://x.com/i/spaces/1AJEmvbLPpkJL?s=20
👍1
Signed Henry | Casper
Showing the 12 most recent of 37 posts we hold for @casperofficialann. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@casperofficialann named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 1 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Casper Official Announcements” (@casperofficialann), 34,102 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/casperofficialann.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.