Fresh stablecoin yields are up on De.Fi Explore 📊 Not just the APY it's the full picture: protocol, chain, TVL, APR history, TVL trend, and Scanner Score, all in one view🔎 Know what you're earning and what you're trusting Try it → http://de.fi/explore

Channel
De.Fi 2.0 Announcements
@defi_ann
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
17,683subscribers
-437 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001168609546 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @defi_ann |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 35 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/defi_ann |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 15:57 | 17,683 | -24 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 05:21 | 17,707 | -16 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 07:15 | 17,723 | -17 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 14:58 | 17,740 | -7 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 19:41 | 17,747 | -15 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 10:59 | 17,762 | -32 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 03:59 | 17,794 | -23 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 20:20 | 17,817 | -11 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 12:34 | 17,828 | -22 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 13:48 | 17,850 | -6 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 15:47 | 17,856 | -16 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 13:24 | 17,872 | -5 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 16:17 | 17,877 | -5 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 18:43 | 17,882 | -5 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 19:53 | 17,887 | -1 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 20:43 | 17,888 | -6 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 21:04 | 17,894 | -15 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 20:54 | 17,909 | -18 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 08:48 | 17,927 | -10 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 20:38 | 17,937 | first reading |
Engagement
25 posts held, back to 15 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 55 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 3.94%
- avg views ÷ 17,683 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 697
- 1 post measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 1
- of 25 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 25 (15 June 2026 – 24 August 2026) |
| Views total | 697 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 09:04 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
🚨No gas prompt. No transaction popups. Just one signed message and a drained wallet😱 Phishing 2.0 is here Read this masterclass thread from our Tech Lead on spotting Permit2 exploits before it's too late👇
🚨We’re excited to present you De.Fi’s Ultimate Security Suite🔥🦸♂️ Built from years of dissecting the biggest crypto hacks & exploits Turning hard-earned lessons into tools that help you spot risks before they become losses🧵👇
💭Before you buy any token, there are only two questions that matter: "What's it worth?" "Can it rug me?" CoinMarketCap answers the first. We built the tool for the second😉🧵
The best yield isn't always on your favorite chain🤷 With support for 20+ chains and seamless tracking via http://De.Fi Bundles, you can monitor premium yield opportunities across different ecosystems - all while keeping your full portfolio in one view😉 What's your favorite chain for yield farming?🧑🌾🧺
🚨It’s time to change that old password you've been using for years As tech and AI get smarter, passwords that used to be safe can now be cracked in just two weeks Great breakdown from our security team🛡️👇
Summer's in full swing. So is De.Fi🌊 Someone has to catch the scams while you catch the sun😎⛱️
The days of spending hours manually auditing smart contracts are officially over🎉 We’ve compressed tonns of due diligence into a single click🚀 🧵Enter the De.Fi Scanner Advanced Tab (to protect your bags and save $)👇
🚨 The Q2 2026 REKT Report just dropped - and it's a wake-up call for everyone⏰ Crypto lost $764M across 67 exploits last quarter (the worst quarter since Q2 2025) This report is a blueprint for protecting your capital👇 https://de.fi/blog/rekt-report-q2-2026-764-million-lost-across-67-incidents
🚨Security intelligence is a competitive advantage The REKT Database gives you a complete view of the latest crypto exploits, helping you understand how attacks happen - and how to avoid them. ⚡ Real-Time Loss Tracking 🔍 Deep-Dive Smart Contract Autopsies 🛡️ 100% Free Web3 Intelligence Don't just react to hacks - learn from them. 🔗https://de.fi/rekt-database
🚨 Why are crypto exploits happening more often? Because the attack surface is no longer one contract In this thread our CTO, Artem, explains why security has moved up the stack👇
Today’s stablecoin menu is live🍽️ But De.Fi Explore doesn’t just show APYs It gives you the context too: protocol, chain, TVL, APR history, TVL trends and Scanner Score✅ Just try it:👉 de.fi/explore
Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @defi_ann. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@casperofficialann · 35,808
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 1 September 2026
@lumia_news · 105,871
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 15 August 2026
@peaqnetwork · 42,721
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 28 August 2026
@CardanoAnnouncements · 35,920
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 1 September 2026
@artyfactnews · 234,661
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 August 2026
@solanium_io · 83,556
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 18 August 2026
@CVALPHA_news · 57,704
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 22 August 2026
@galaxylabofficial · 50,609
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 24 August 2026
@PancakeSwapAnn · 28,564
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 9 September 2026
This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“De.Fi 2.0 Announcements” (@defi_ann), 17,683 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/defi_ann.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.