Bowfun - ATH 4M Bowjak - ATH 200k Bowfrens on bow ? 0x8Fca38CB20D786f546bC31D5F24c49364e748b03

Channel
Know what youβre bagging. π
@cyberpunkgamble
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Handles named that no longer answer Β· Cite this entry
28subscribers
+4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003758223467 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cyberpunkgamble |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 14 June 2026 β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cyberpunkgamble |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Sept 2026, 09:55 | 28 | +2 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 03:29 | 26 | +2 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 11:04 | 24 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:26 | 24 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 14 June 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
4 reactions across 3 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| π₯ | 3 | 75.0% | |
| β€ | 1 | 25.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 4 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 June 2026 to 16 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
πππππ $178 HOUSE OF DOGE BUY! πβ‘πͺΆπβ‘πͺΆπβ‘πͺΆπβ‘πͺΆπβ‘πͺΆπβ‘πͺΆπβ‘πͺΆπβ‘πͺΆπβ‘πͺΆπβ‘πͺΆπβ‘πͺΆπβ‘πͺΆ β‘οΈ WETH: 0.1 ($178) β¬ οΈ HODO: 42M π€ Buyer / Txn π ΏοΈ Position: NEW π Marketcap: $4K πChart | π΅οΈ Calls |π Trending
HODO on Robinhood Will run too 0x5C8Bc1D109f5B1c45d4FC1d0d83927f23DC58c51 https://t.me/HouseOfDogeRobinHood
β€1
KEKIUS on ROBINHOOD, CALL at 7k - ATH 80K now 25K
OG on Robinhood House of Doge - HODO : https://t.me/HouseOfDogeRobinHood
πππππ $31 HOUSE OF DOGE BUY! πͺπͺπͺπͺ β‘οΈ WETH: 0.017 ($31) β¬ οΈ HODO: 11M π€ Buyer / Txn π ΏοΈ Position: NEW π Marketcap: $3K πChart | π΅οΈ Calls |π Trending
πππππ $26 KEKIUS MAXIMUS BUY! πΈπΈπΈ β‘οΈ WETH: 0.015 ($26) β¬ οΈ KEKIUS: 4M π€ Buyer / Txn π ΏοΈ Position: NEW π Marketcap: $7K πChart | π΅οΈ Calls |π Trending
House of Doge Buy! πππππ π΅ 0.033 ETH ($56.90) πͺ 3,819 HODO π· 0xc8d4β¦fcf4 | Txn πΌ Position +190.98% πΌ Market Cap $15,070 π Chart π¦ Trade πΉ Trending π’ Trending π₯ @ETHTRENDING
House of Doge Buy! ππππ π΅ 0.025 ETH ($44.87) πͺ 12,813 HODO π· 0xa5f7β¦d53f | Txn β New Holder πΌ Market Cap $3,577 π Chart π¦ Trade πΉ Trending
Book of Bitcoin Buy! πͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺ π΅ 0.076 ETH ($132.30) πͺ 896,316,463 $BOB π· 0x30c2β¦52f7 | Txn πΌ Position +31.76% πΌ Market Cap $15,287 π Chart π¦ Trade πΉ Trending π’ Trending π₯ @ETHTRENDING
I don't usually watch low caps this closely. But this one feels different. Hopefully we're building a real community gem here. NFA DYOR
Book of Bitcoin Buy! πͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺ π΅ 0.012 ETH ($20.52) πͺ 235,064,021 $BOB π· 0xea0cβ¦fc36 | Txn β New Holder πΌ Market Cap $8,769 π Chart π¦ Trade πΉ Trending π’ Trending π₯ @ETHTRENDING
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @cyberpunkgamble. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channelβs posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 1
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 0
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@cyberpunkgamble named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handleβs history β see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today β not that anything βdiedβ. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant β a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
named in 3 posts, 12 August 2026 β 12 August 2026 Β· confirmed gone 11 September 2026 (two independent sightings β see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βKnow what youβre bagging. πβ (@cyberpunkgamble), 28 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cyberpunkgamble.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.