Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for مزاد هدايا Korean_ko

Channel

مزاد هدايا Korean_ko

@d_dd7

On this record: Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

9,319subscribers

+3,124 since we began measuring on 17 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002328195185
TypeChannel
Username@d_dd7
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded18 August 2026
Last confirmed live3 September 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 3 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/d_dd7

Previous handles

@d_dd7 was previously reachable at this handle, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today — only that this channel no longer does.

@ockcccc
held 18 August 202618 August 2026

Growth

6,1959,5087,851.517 August 2026 — 6,195 subscribers18 August 2026 — 9,508 subscribers18 August 2026 — 9,508 subscribers19 August 2026 — 9,501 subscribers19 August 2026 — 9,501 subscribers22 August 2026 — 9,417 subscribers25 August 2026 — 9,347 subscribers28 August 2026 — 9,274 subscribers31 August 2026 — 9,359 subscribers3 September 2026 — 9,319 subscribers9,31917 August 20263 September 2026
10 measurements spanning 17 days, net +3,124. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,698–10,005 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Sept 2026, 20:419,319-40
31 Aug 2026, 04:489,359+85
28 Aug 2026, 13:159,274-73
25 Aug 2026, 16:489,347-70
22 Aug 2026, 18:569,417-84
19 Aug 2026, 07:459,501no change
19 Aug 2026, 07:309,501-7
18 Aug 2026, 07:009,508no change
18 Aug 2026, 06:529,508+3,313
17 Aug 2026, 10:156,195first reading

Engagement

320 posts held, back to 17 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.05%
avg views ÷ 9,319 subscribers
Avg views / post
97.5
320 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.10%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
320
of 320 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 178 of 320 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026
Posts held320 (17 August 202629 August 2026)
Views total31,197
Reactions total385
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 07:56 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
12s
Average length
12s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

385 reactions across 176 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 76.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
29676.9%
🔥318.05%
🤣194.94%
❤‍🔥174.42%
😭123.12%
😁102.60%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 178 of the 320 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 385 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 320 most recent posts we hold, published 17 August 2026 to 29 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 320 we hold a reading for · 0.3%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @d_dd7. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 320 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 August 2026 to 29 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

29 Aug 2026, 04:00 UTC47 viewsread 29 August 2026

مزاد عام ✅ زاود تتريجيا مثل m او t او as مزاد لنشر هديتك ارسل @k5o55 t.me/nft/LunarSnake-93024

Signed 𝑺𝑨𝑨`𝑫

29 Aug 2026, 03:08 UTC51 viewsread 29 August 2026

مزاد عام ✅ زاود تتريجيا مثل m او t او as مزاد لنشر هديتك ارسل @k5o55 t.me/nft/XmasStocking-86850

Signed 𝑺𝑨𝑨`𝑫

29 Aug 2026, 03:04 UTC44 views3 reactionsread 29 August 2026

افتتاح المزاد العام الان ❌ النشر فقط هنا ارسل هديتك او معرفك @k5o55 ✈️

2🔥1

Signed 𝑺𝑨𝑨`𝑫

29 Aug 2026, 00:53 UTC75 views3 reactionsread 29 August 2026

#اعلان مطلوب تون صرف 2.1 مستعجل @k5o55

3

Signed 𝑺𝑨𝑨`𝑫

29 Aug 2026, 00:49 UTC74 views3 reactionsread 29 August 2026

The biggest auction in Korean .🔥 الى هنا ننهي لمزاد الجباري ..❕ اعتذر من اي شخص ما نشرت هديته ان شاء الله نعوض يوم غدا واقوه من ليوم ، واعتذر عن التقصير حبايب الروح . ⚡️

3

Signed 𝑺𝑨𝑨`𝑫

28 Aug 2026, 23:12 UTC109 viewsread 29 August 2026

ركز ⚠️ هديه أجباري ⚠️ الوقت ( 7 دقيقه تنباع لأعلى سعر) اجبارياً ⚠️ هنا النشر @k5o55 t.me/nft/LovePotion-5300

Signed 𝑺𝑨𝑨`𝑫

28 Aug 2026, 22:58 UTC102 views1 reactionsread 29 August 2026

ركز ⚠️ هديه أجباري ⚠️ الوقت ( 7 دقيقه تنباع لأعلى سعر) اجبارياً ⚠️ هنا النشر @k5o55 t.me/nft/LunarSnake-93024

1

Signed 𝑺𝑨𝑨`𝑫

28 Aug 2026, 22:52 UTC90 viewsread 29 August 2026

اكرر وعيد ❌❌ شرح مهم جدا بخصوص تطبيق تونكيبر 👇 https://t.me/xrxlxru/2277 بخصوص سحب السهم ولتحويل ورفع القيود عنه ولعكس بلغه الانكليزيه

Signed ko كوري

28 Aug 2026, 22:05 UTC93 viewsread 29 August 2026

دزو هداياكم حبايب والمحظور يسويلي تاك بالشات

Signed 𝑺𝑨𝑨`𝑫

28 Aug 2026, 21:35 UTC94 views2 reactionsread 29 August 2026

انفتح المزاد الإجباري يمي @k5o55 🗄 1-تأكد من هديتك ما عليها تقيد🔓 2-تأكد من امتلاكك نجوم التحويل👌 3-تعرض ما تبيع غرامة 0.1 تون❗️ 4-تزاود ما تشتري = تقييد🤝

2

Signed 𝑺𝑨𝑨`𝑫

28 Aug 2026, 20:38 UTC121 views5 reactionsread 29 August 2026

ل وسيط بيروس اتقيد ماكو كل نشر تكدرون تاخذون راحتكم حبايب قلبي https://t.me/c/3758799299/862752 بسبب الكفر

2🔥1🤣1😭1

Signed ko كوري

28 Aug 2026, 20:35 UTC116 viewsread 29 August 2026

بعده مواصل لكويك وين نايمين؟

Signed بًيَروٌسِ

Showing the 12 most recent of 320 posts we hold for @d_dd7. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“مزاد هدايا Korean_ko” (@d_dd7), 9,319 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/d_dd7.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.