1.20$

Channel
TON Price
@tonprices
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
56,201subscribers
-1,551 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001725586424 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tonprices |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 1 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 57 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 1 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tonprices |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 86% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Nov 2026, 00:49 | 56,201 | +10 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 03:17 | 56,191 | +175 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 23:38 | 56,016 | +30 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 03:11 | 55,986 | -47 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 22:37 | 56,033 | +2 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 21:56 | 56,031 | -10 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 21:07 | 56,041 | -25 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 20:55 | 56,066 | +147 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 19:17 | 55,919 | -50 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 17:29 | 55,969 | -49 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 14:34 | 56,018 | -46 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 13:59 | 56,064 | -52 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 14:20 | 56,116 | +15 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 17:47 | 56,101 | -37 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 19:07 | 56,138 | -37 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 15:50 | 56,175 | -16 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 16:11 | 56,191 | -16 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 14:16 | 56,207 | -17 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 04:57 | 56,224 | -61 |
| 8 Oct 2026, 23:18 | 56,285 | first reading |
Engagement
3,460 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 174 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.69%
- avg views ÷ 56,201 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 388
- 1,180 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 1,180
- of 3,460 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 32 of 1,180 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 3,460 (5 August 2026 – 31 October 2026) |
| Views total | 457,672 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 31 Oct 2026, 22:34 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 45
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 25
- of 1,000 we hold a reading for · 3%
- Most on one post
- 9
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @tonprices. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold for this entry (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 7 October 2026 to 31 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
1.20$
1.20$
1.21$
1.21$
1.21$
1.21$
1.21$
1.21$
1.21$
1.21$
1.21$
Showing the 12 most recent of 3,460 posts we hold for @tonprices. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 217 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
@MRARX · 50,26917 postsFor Sale
@forsaleusernames1 · 88915 postsMohnad
@Mohnad_9 · 17,41214 postsGifts advices
@GiftAdvices · 46 postsCrypto Drav | Official
@Crypto_drav · 47,7945 postsNFT PROFIT
@NFTproflt · 3,9085 postsDewid NFT
@DewidNFT · 1454 posts宫城Major蓝标认证
@Gcsvip8 · 15,4194 postsگیفت | Empty
@GiftEmpty · 21,6584 postsچنل جهان
@NFT_JaHAN · 294 postsShakh NFT
@ShakhNFT · 8,3654 postsFlakko trade
@flakko_trade · 1094 postsleak
@leakoflive · 194 postsLeviathan
@leviathanius · 4,9764 postsGift Tel
@persiannftclub · 51,4544 posts🚀🚀ТОN BOOSTER🚀🚀
@tonboosterser · 314 postsتل آموز | TeleAmoz
@AMOAirdrop · 98,2543 postsاخبار گیفت | CoinsHub
@Coins4Hub · 79,3743 postsCRYPTO SAMURAI
@CryptoSamuraiDefi · 1013 postsGifts
@FiftyGifts · 5663 postsNFTShark 🦈
@NFTSharkF · 6583 postsMrkt bural
@Tradebural · 13 postsCrypto Meekz
@cryptomeekz · 1503 postsDRAGON|GIFTS
@dragongiftes · 33 postsFLIPPER FROG
@flipperfrog · 2353 postsG1ft Hunter
@g1ft_hunter · 1413 postsGemPay⚡️
@info_cryptouz · 8183 postsGift Hunt | شکار گیفت
@skargift · 72,8113 postsChrysos NFTs
@ChrysosNFTs · 3832 posts𝘿𝙤𝙯𝙯𝙮 𝙨𝙩𝙖𝙧𝙨⚡
@Dozzy_stars · 3942 postsDurov’s eggs
@DurovEggs · 4,8152 postsGift News
@G_I_2 · 14,3902 postsچالش گیفت رایگان | اخبار گیفت |قرعه کشی گیفت
@Giftfree2 · 3502 postsPlay Points | نقاط التشغيل ⚡
@H_HKE · 9,6642 postsZeR0's rep
@IsItZeR0own · 192 postsSanta Grift
@Santagrift · 1,0642 postsVili Earn
@ch_vili · 61,4372 postsLife is this👨✈️
@cryptauzs · 192 postsКриптохактивист
@cryptohacktivist · 392 posts💪ttßøømik🇺🇦NFT SHOP🇺🇦
@defayDEDA · 122 postsлудки от фуфела
@fufelton · 4672 posts♻️ Femmo ♻️
@giftbandaa · 2382 postsGift Lovers
@giftslovers · 48,9532 postsKAROL TRADE🚀
@karol_community · 3732 postsКреветка Ву
@krevetkaVu · 212 postsmalet
@maletnft · 1352 postsMice Stars
@mice_shop · 642 postsGift Tore
@nfttore · 10,3072 posts
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 20 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@peshkov_news · 3,3416 postsdeleted
@news_xaut · 15 postsPaltys gift
@ooopaltyshaslooo · 84 postsʜᴀsᴛᴇʀᴏv ᴀᴅᴀᴘᴛᴇʀ
@adhstrvv · 301 postХаотичный Хомяк
@chaos_hamster · 71 postConnection
@counllne · 191 postDDK || NERWEX Переходник
@DDKlvi · 341 postпереходник —> @padshboss
@frizsssss · 11 postFunTimeEventsBot | Реклама
@FunTimeEventsBotAd · 881 post𝐁𝐢𝐨𝐠𝐫𝐚𝐩𝐡𝐲
@hatefulness666 · 281 postkurdtona
@kurstona · 21 postMANUALS LANCY
@LancyNFT · 91 postTOP Miners | تاپ ماینرز
@MarketAlertLive · 5,6361 postСМИ ФанТайм Информация | Media FunTime Information
@media_funtime_info · 41 postMilkyWey crypto | TON за рубли
@MilkyWeyCrypto · 1171 postOpenDucks 🐤
@openducks · 3751 postSDVG — Важное ❗️
@SDVGinfo · 121 postТекилыч
@Tekila_Thoughts · 181 postTONBOOSTER_EN🇬🇧
@tonboostereng · 5391 postwᴇxᴛu ʙiᴏ
@wextubio · 91 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@tonusdprices · 24,679#1
@solusdprices · 13,269#2
@BTCprices · 25,426#3
@ethprices · 13,574#4
@USDTRUBPrices · 6,274#5
@litecoinprice · 4,263#6
@dogs_price · 5,432#7
@kursgrama · 2,659#8
@bnbusdprices · 6,263#9
@NotPriceX · 548#10
@dogs · 6,551,073#11
@notcoin · 8,005,470#12
@blumcrypto · 13,079,823#13
@hamster_kombat · 19,849,285#14
@walt_news · 3,334,706#15
@durov · 10,181,745#16
@gram · 6,313,557#17
@pricenotcoins · 1,828#18
@rhymesrim · 288,374#19
@tgadmin_life · 5,899#20
@vvskingbro · 16,008#21
@theyescoin · 5,257,775#22
@catizenann · 3,357,805#23
@rhymestg · 1,492,590#24
@cryptobotru · 2,181,264#25
@cultofnot · 987,544#26
@walt_news_cis · 1,091,565#27
@ppppr · 3,439#28
@crypto_okop · 143,404#29
@uoiiisold · 1,103#30
@meconcore · 3#31
@builders · 3,270,553#32
@ekaterina_mizulina · 921,923#33
@VirusObmen · 5,578#34
@zicelaqo · 159,783#35
@ruma_tg · 2,237#36
@grambestprice · 920#37
@jokes300cpm · 1,673#38
@nmshhub · 676,051#39
@mellstroybonus · 332,054#40
@gudini_pro_telegram · 3,580#41
@amg_blog · 734#42
@toncoin_rus · 511,660#43
@investkingyru · 1,598,149#44
@DogsPriceFa · 5,369#45
@idoras · 15,437#46
@unofficial · 11,329#47
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 23 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@tonusdprices · 24,679
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 16 September 2026
@kkklk · 20,367
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 4 here — alongside 3 others — read 25 September 2026
@YB_13 · 23,689
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 7 here — alongside 6 others — read 13 September 2026
@Xx_SYD · 95,145
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 30 here — alongside 29 others — read 16 August 2026
@fuporiji · 21,292
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 22 here — alongside 21 others — read 11 September 2026
@sniper · 135,154
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 13 August 2026
@ARE5H · 630,659
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 16 August 2026
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“TON Price” (@tonprices), 56,201 subscribers as measured 1 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tonprices.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.