99.72$

Channel
SOL Price
@solusdprices
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
13,295subscribers
+542 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002054516195 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @solusdprices |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 23 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 45 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 23 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/solusdprices |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 81% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 23 Oct 2026, 06:18 | 13,295 | -11 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 08:27 | 13,306 | -9 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 04:39 | 13,315 | +3 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 05:19 | 13,312 | -6 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 08:29 | 13,318 | -6 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 06:47 | 13,324 | -7 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 04:48 | 13,331 | -6 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 06:35 | 13,337 | +4 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 01:47 | 13,333 | -11 |
| 11 Oct 2026, 12:42 | 13,344 | -10 |
| 7 Oct 2026, 00:56 | 13,354 | -30 |
| 2 Oct 2026, 05:18 | 13,384 | +285 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 15:20 | 13,099 | +9 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 05:59 | 13,090 | -10 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 15:41 | 13,100 | -2 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 05:21 | 13,102 | -28 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 05:01 | 13,130 | -26 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 07:15 | 13,156 | -19 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 05:16 | 13,175 | -8 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 13:39 | 13,183 | first reading |
Engagement
980 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 49 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 980 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
2 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 980 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 980 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
99.72$
99.72$
99.77$
99.77$
99.8$
99.8$
99.8$
99.75$
99.75$
99.77$
99.59$
Showing the 12 most recent of 980 posts we hold for @solusdprices. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 79 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
@AnimeGems · 9,56311 postscrypto_fexirgems
@Crypto_FexirGems · 2334 postswe are just exit liquidity
@awflip · 1053 postsfucker of this retardio
@fckretardio · 283 postsShocked Calls
@shockedcalls · 46,6563 postsConor Calls
@ConorCallss · 242 postsCrypto Chef Cooks
@CryptoChefCooks · 9,7092 postsDEGEN LORD 🪽 GAMBLE PLAYS
@DegenLordCalls · 2382 postsINFINITYGAIN CALLS
@InfinityGainCalls · 4,3992 postsTJR Trades
@TJRTradesChannel · 2872 postsThe V2 Lounge
@V2lounge · 3202 postsBATMAN GEMS 🦇
@batman_gem · 19,6602 postsLuzh
@luzhayka7 · 1,3432 postsPajeet Cabal [closed]
@pajeetsolcalls · 842 postsshaka's island
@shakasisland · 7502 posts💎Snatcher callouts💎
@snatchercallout · 8,5372 postsWW3 Cabal
@ww3cabal · 2242 postsALPHA CALLS
@Alphadaocalls · 2,0761 postBrian’s Calls | High Conviction Only
@BSLounge · 1,9931 post🐳CODY WHALES GAMBELS 🐳
@CODYGAMBLES · 121 postCapCalls
@CapCalls · 1,0991 postCasper's Cache
@CaspersCache · 1101 post♕G€MS♕ ARCADE ♧ 💎
@GEMS_ACADE · 1271 postHermes Apes
@HermesArmy · 5091 postHermes Degens
@HermesDegens · 8201 postINVEST&INSAID With KOS💵💎💸
@Insaid43invest · 2691 postWeb3Sergeich
@JefroCrypto · 191 postLegacy Calls
@Legacy_calls009 · 681 postLegit | News
@Legit_Lads · 391 postLeo Calls 🦁
@LeoCalls75 · 5631 postLiam's gems calls
@LiamsGemCalls · 17,5471 postAr Gambles 🎲
@argambles · 341 postBangers 👾
@bangers · 991 postBATMAN GAMBLE 🦇
@bat_gamble · 15,7841 postBillions Club 💎 (FREE)
@billionsclubfree · 20,6251 postBjMax
@bj_max · 161 postBunny’s Gambling Room ∆
@bunnycalls · 8,8261 postjax alpha
@cabaljax · 17,2471 postCRYPTO GYM
@crypto_gym01 · 2,3691 postdoontp
@doontpsolstreak · 3681 postdo real things 💼
@dorealthing · 331 postcalls by fanboy
@fanboycalls · 11,6971 postFear Calls
@fearcalls · 5,2181 postHazu Alpha Calls
@hazusol · 7651 postishscalls
@ishscalls · 1,4691 postJAY'S CALLS | ALL CHAINS
@jayscallsallchains · 3201 postKnoya's Trench Zone 💎
@kgambles · 1,9321 postOVC ALPHA
@lightpepe · 131 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@tonprices · 55,919
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 23 August 2026
@bitcoin_price · 56,742
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 23 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“SOL Price” (@solusdprices), 13,295 subscribers as measured 23 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/solusdprices.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.