99.72$

Channel
SOL Price
@solusdprices
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
13,156subscribers
+403 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002054516195 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @solusdprices |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 28 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/solusdprices |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Sept 2026, 07:15 | 13,156 | -19 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 05:16 | 13,175 | -8 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 13:39 | 13,183 | +3 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 08:33 | 13,180 | -1 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 09:33 | 13,181 | -9 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 10:58 | 13,190 | +3 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 09:16 | 13,187 | +16 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 07:04 | 13,171 | +41 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 04:03 | 13,130 | +151 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 04:24 | 12,979 | +17 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 06:42 | 12,962 | +41 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 04:43 | 12,921 | +32 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 23:33 | 12,889 | +89 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 05:18 | 12,800 | +67 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 19:08 | 12,733 | +39 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 17:33 | 12,694 | +16 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 15:24 | 12,678 | -8 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 12:17 | 12,686 | -14 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 04:53 | 12,700 | -13 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 17:24 | 12,713 | first reading |
Engagement
980 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 49 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.053%
- avg views ÷ 13,156 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 6.9
- 760 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 4.65%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 760
- of 980 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 760 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 980 (7 August 2026 – 2 September 2026) |
| Views total | 5,252 |
| Reactions total | 2 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 2 Sept 2026, 20:35 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
2 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 980 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 980 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
99.72$
99.72$
99.77$
99.77$
99.8$
99.8$
99.8$
99.75$
99.75$
99.77$
99.59$
Showing the 12 most recent of 980 posts we hold for @solusdprices. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@AnimeGems · 9,80511 postsFEXIRCALLS🎲♟️
@Crypto_FexirGems · 14,0534 postswe are just exit liquidity
@awflip · 1063 postsfucker of this retardio
@fckretardio · 283 postssoundscabel
@soundscabel · 1363 postsBATMAN GEMS 🦇
@batman_gem · 22,6742 postsConor Calls
@ConorCallss · 242 postsCrypto Chef Cooks
@CryptoChefCooks · 9,8542 postsDEGEN LORD 🪽 GAMBLE PLAYS
@DegenLordCalls · 2522 postsINFINITYGAIN CALLS
@InfinityGainCalls · 4,5922 postsLuzh
@luzhayka7 · 1,3712 postsPajeet Cabal [closed]
@pajeetsolcalls · 852 postsshaka's island
@shakasisland · 7702 posts💎Snatcher callouts💎
@snatchercallout · 8,6672 postsTJR Trades
@TJRTradesChannel · 2572 postsThe V2 Lounge
@V2lounge · 3272 postsWW3 Cabal
@ww3cabal · 2282 postsALPHA CALLS
@Alphadaocalls · 2,1271 postAr Gambles 🎲
@argambles · 341 postBangers 👾
@bangers · 961 postBATMAN GAMBLE 🦇
@bat_gamble · 20,7281 postBillions Club 💎 (FREE)
@billionsclubfree · 21,3711 postBjMax
@bj_max · 161 postBrian’s Calls | High Conviction Only
@BSLounge · 2,0201 postBunny’s Gambling Room ∆
@bunnycalls · 8,7451 postjax alpha
@cabaljax · 16,4011 postCapCalls
@CapCalls · 1,1181 postCasper's Cache
@CaspersCache · 1171 post🐳CODY WHALES GAMBELS 🐳
@CODYGAMBLES · 121 postCRYPTO GYM
@crypto_gym01 · 2,4261 postdoontp
@doontpsolstreak · 3661 postdo real things 💼
@dorealthing · 321 postcalls by fanboy
@fanboycalls · 11,9651 post♕G€MS♕ ARCADE ♧ 💎
@GEMS_ACADE · 1291 postHazu Alpha Calls
@hazusol · 8121 postHermes Apes
@HermesArmy · 5451 postHermes Degens
@HermesDegens · 8911 postINVEST&INSAID With KOS💵💎💸
@Insaid43invest · 2771 postishscalls
@ishscalls · 1,5331 postJAY'S CALLS | ALL CHAINS
@jayscallsallchains · 3601 postWeb3Sergeich
@JefroCrypto · 191 postKnoya's Trench Zone 💎
@kgambles · 1,9671 postLegacy Calls
@Legacy_calls009 · 711 postLegit | News
@Legit_Lads · 411 postLeo Calls 🦁
@LeoCalls75 · 5891 postLiam's gems calls
@LiamsGemCalls · 22,4061 postOVC ALPHA
@lightpepe · 141 postLoner’s Casino
@lonerscasino · 2761 postLUNAR GEMS CALL 📢
@LUNARgemsCALL · 13,3131 postMANICS TRADING JOURNAL
@ManicsJournal · 7,5821 postRobinhood
@moneykay30 · 31 postMORIARTY | ПУТЬ В КРИПТЕ
@moriroad · 711 postn1kez gamble
@nikezcalls · 411 postNoah crypto calls
@Noah_crypto_calls · 9,9811 posto.r.s.
@orscalls · 371 postPatrick Crypto
@patrickscrypto · 3781 postPillowPlays Macro
@Pillowplayssol · 3761 postPrince’s Alpha 👑
@princesalpha · 2,3791 postQuagmire Callz
@Quagmire_Callz · 9541 postSolana Home 🏡
@realsolanahome · 15,0491 postSAITAMA CALLS👊
@SAITAMA_CALLS · 6721 postSanchez
@sanchez_solana · 1,8081 postShakers Trenches
@ShakerCalls · 31,1851 postsolar
@shhitmoney · 1501 postShocked Calls
@shockedcalls · 33,6521 postAnother
@sixonfour · 1051 postSkupa Hand
@skupahand · 571 postENGY (resistance arc)
@sol_engy · 1,4471 postSYNERGY_CoreS
@synergycores · 4461 postT7
@t7x100 · 6871 postReaper Gems
@TheReaperGems · 17,6401 postZoinbase
@thezoinbase · 16,8001 postCryptoTISM
@Top_G_Calls · 19,4571 post2 Girls 1 Sol
@twogirlsonesolana · 321 postuglykolibrya 🏝️ no risk no normaldaki
@uglydumb · 821 postVaig's Hut
@VaigAlpha · 1021 postV’S BASE
@Vicarbase · 7,2021 postWOOF CALLS 🐺💎
@WOOF_CALL · 6571 postYegi Calls
@yegiCALLs · 7,8401 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@tonprices · 56,826
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 23 August 2026
@bitcoin_price · 56,344
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 23 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“SOL Price” (@solusdprices), 13,156 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/solusdprices.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.