Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for PONV Daily

Channel

PONV Daily

@daily_ponv

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

728subscribers

+4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001210548295
TypeChannel
Username@daily_ponv
Created10 August 2018measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/daily_ponv

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 69% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

723728725.56 August 2026 — 724 subscribers6 August 2026 — 724 subscribers26 August 2026 — 723 subscribers19 September 2026 — 728 subscribers6 August 202619 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 44 days, net +4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 722–729 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 05:41728+5
26 Aug 2026, 22:36723-1
6 Aug 2026, 16:14724no change
6 Aug 2026, 15:39724first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 16 September 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

80 reactions across 18 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥3138.8%
👍1215.0%
911.3%
👏810.0%
😁810.0%
🤣33.75%
🤩33.75%
🤨22.50%
🫡22.50%
🌭11.25%
💔11.25%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 80 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 September 2025 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Aug 2026, 23:10 UTC242 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026

People in the know say it's a daily-worth material, https://youtu.be/FTmmG3Dx8HA

🔥5

Signed Sergey Kucherenko

20 Jun 2026, 12:37 UTC574 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Intrinsically Correct Algorithms and Recursive Coalgebras Cass Alexandru, Henning Urbat, Thorsten Wißmann Recursive coalgebras provide an elegant categorical tool for modelling recursive algorithms and analysing their termination and correctness. By considering coalgebras over categories of suitably indexed families, the correctness of the corresponding algorithms follows intrinsically just from the type of the comp

🌭1🔥1

Signed Sergey Kucherenko

23 Apr 2026, 13:06 UTC778 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026

https://yangzhixuan.github.io/NbE.html Yang, [2026] "An Algorithmic Reconstruction of Normalisation by Evaluation"

🔥5

Signed Alex Gryzlov

21 Apr 2026, 19:40 UTC753 viewsread 6 August 2026

A Very Elementary Introduction to Sheaves M. Agrios, 2022 https://arxiv.org/abs/2202.01379

Signed Sergey Kucherenko

14 Apr 2026, 10:53 UTC949 views14 reactionsread 6 August 2026

От этой папиры весь тви писается: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.21852

😁7🔥4🤣3

Signed λoλcat

2 Apr 2026, 12:39 UTC923 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

The Discoveries of Continuations John Reynolds https://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/wadler/papers/papers-we-love/reynolds-discoveries.pdf

😁1

Signed Sergey Kucherenko

2 Apr 2026, 09:39 UTC853 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

https://khoury.northeastern.edu/~cmartens/papers/plateau26-itfp.pdf Martens, Tosch, Semenova, Li, [2026] "Is truth futureproof? : On the possible futures of mechanized proofs" https://khoury.northeastern.edu/~cmartens/talks/plateau-itfp-talk-slides.pdf

👍1

Signed Alex Gryzlov

29 Mar 2026, 16:56 UTC930 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

https://mchav.github.io/what-category-theory-teaches-us-about-dataframes/

👍1

Signed Sergey Kucherenko

24 Mar 2026, 08:26 UTC921 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

https://pages.cs.wisc.edu/~remzi/Naur.pdf Naur, [1985] "Programming as theory building"

🫡2🔥1

Signed Alex Gryzlov

21 Mar 2026, 19:37 UTC950 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Dynamic Programming, volume 2 https://dp.quantecon.org/

🔥4👍2

Signed Sergey Kucherenko

3 Mar 2026, 21:19 UTC≈1,020 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

https://www-cs-faculty.stanford.edu/~knuth/papers/claude-cycles.pdf

🔥3

Signed Sergey Kucherenko

24 Feb 2026, 10:12 UTC≈1,120 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026

"Package Managers à la Carte, A Formal Model of Dependency Resolution" https://arxiv.org/pdf/2602.18602

🔥7

Signed Sergey Kucherenko

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @daily_ponv. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“PONV Daily” (@daily_ponv), 728 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/daily_ponv.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.