Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for truly part of me

Channel

truly part of me

@truly_part

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

261subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001903447439
TypeChannel
Username@truly_part
CreatedBetween 1 March 2023 and 31 January 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/truly_part

Growth

2602622616 August 2026 — 260 subscribers7 August 2026 — 260 subscribers24 August 2026 — 261 subscribers31 August 2026 — 262 subscribers10 September 2026 — 261 subscribers6 August 202610 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 35 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 260–262 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Sept 2026, 12:41261-1
31 Aug 2026, 09:45262+1
24 Aug 2026, 01:06261+1
7 Aug 2026, 01:33260no change
6 Aug 2026, 16:16260first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 31 January 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

129 reactions across 16 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥2720.9%
2519.4%
👍2418.6%
😁1511.6%
🤣129.30%
🤯129.30%
🙏43.10%
🕊32.33%
❤‍🔥21.55%
💘21.55%
🤩21.55%
👀10.775%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 129 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 31 January 2025 to 20 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

20 Jul 2026, 18:35 UTC281 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Возвращение двача

❤‍🔥2🔥1

15 Jul 2026, 00:05 UTC441 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

в телеграмме наконец-то можно делать нормальные посты и даже вставлять формулы, но только с премиумом вход в расширенный редактор появляется в верхнем уголке при вводе более 50 символов

4

13 Jul 2026, 21:52 UTC344 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @zenzeli

О оказывается в природе есть видео Гротендика https://youtu.be/KNNKu4tYjQ4?is=6tzR-ok4RgwdgKfB

🔥4

18 Apr 2026, 08:15 UTC720 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://youtu.be/nowJvVYHqiY?si=vUv6AEgRim0DmSMK если вдруг кто еще не подписался на канал

🔥4😁3🤩2

30 Mar 2026, 14:02 UTC814 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026

В последние недели на ВШМ обсуждают негомеоморфность ленты Мёбиуса и цилиндра Это задача из листочка по топологии-1, которую всем хочется решить в терминах количества компонент связности края. Но чтобы определить край, необходимо показать, что R^n и замкнутое полупространство R^n_+ негомеоморфны для n = 2. При n = 1 это очевидно по аргументу через выкидывание точки и связность. Но чтобы мерить дырки коразмерности б

🔥8👍53

2 Mar 2026, 11:13 UTC569 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Упражнение. Пусть F: C -> D <- E: G финитно доступные и правые сопряженные функторы, а все категории в диаграмме локально конечно представимы. Верно ли, что C x_D E локально представима? (ответы под спойлером, конечно) P.S. Строгий 2-пулбэк категорий (в смысле просто подлежащих множеств) -- это (само по себе) бессмысленное понятие. Типа {0} : 1 -> Set <- 1 : {1} "контрпример" тогда, поскольку это "разные" объекты.

🤯4

16 Sept 2025, 00:00 UTC≈4,730 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Да, кстати, введение в бесконечность-категории, написанное инвариантным языком: https://runegha.folk.ntnu.no/naivecat_web.pdf Чистое и содержательное. Возможно, лучший вводный текст на сегодняшний день (написан весной 2025). Узнал о нём от Игната.

👍105🙏4💘2🔥2

5 Sept 2025, 14:51 UTC≈1,410 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @spbumathcsVideo message

Video message, posted without a caption

🤯82

5 Sept 2025, 14:51 UTC≈1,340 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @spbumathcs

Главный научный сотрудник факультета и коллега профессора Фарджуна Роман Михайлов объясняет, почему стоит посетить семинар:

😁3

5 Sept 2025, 14:51 UTC≈1,210 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @spbumathcsPhoto

⚡️ Уважаемые коллеги! 9 сентября состоится совместный коллоквиум Международного математического института им. Л. Эйлера и факультета МКН. Профессор Эммануэль Дрор Фарджун (Институт математики Эйнштейна, Еврейский университет в Иерусалиме, Израиль) выступит с докладом по теме "The Bousfield Kan completion as an infinity terminal monad": We give a universal property of the well-known Bousfield-Kan R-homology completi

13 Apr 2025, 12:40 UTC≈1,300 views0 reactionsread 7 August 2026

I was an nLab holdout for saying that really should be called the Yoneda lemma. Whether you think of Yoneda as saying that hom-bimodules are units for the biclosed structure on bimodules, or for the tensor structure on bimodules -- that's a distinction which doesn't need to be made IMHO, since a unit for one is clearly the unit for the other. But it seems I lost that terminological battle, alas. Todd Trimble +, не

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @truly_part. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“truly part of me” (@truly_part), 261 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/truly_part.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.