Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for DDRILLS

Channel

DDRILLS

@ddrills

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

954subscribers

+34 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002481686499
TypeChannel
Username@ddrills
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live31 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 31 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ddrills

Growth

920955937.57 August 2026 — 920 subscribers8 August 2026 — 920 subscribers16 August 2026 — 943 subscribers24 August 2026 — 955 subscribers31 August 2026 — 954 subscribers9547 August 202631 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 24 days, net +34. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 915–960 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
31 Aug 2026, 13:02954-1
24 Aug 2026, 04:28955+12
16 Aug 2026, 19:47943+23
8 Aug 2026, 01:01920no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:39920first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 8 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 35s
Average length
48s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

199 reactions across 13 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
7336.7%
🔥4120.6%
😁199.55%
❤‍🔥189.05%
👀84.02%
👍84.02%
😍52.51%
42.01%
💔42.01%
😱42.01%
👎21.01%
👨‍💻21.01%
🙈21.01%
🤯21.01%
🥰21.01%
👏10.503%
💋10.503%
💯10.503%
😎10.503%
🙉10.503%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 199 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
82
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 14 we hold a reading for · 14%
Most on one post
81
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ddrills. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 July 2026 to 2 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

2 Aug 2026, 13:46 UTC198 views26 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Провели воркшоп, очень много классных работ получилось. Рад познакомитсья с таким количеством талантливых людей! Под этим постом давайте допилим концепты. Присылайте ваши виджеты)

❤‍🔥1833🔥2

2 Aug 2026, 08:03 UTC226 viewsread 8 August 2026

2 места освободилось! Пишите пожалуйста @rockindesigner кто хочет и первых двух запишу) Upd: забрали, спасибо 🙏

31 Jul 2026, 10:10 UTC273 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Как думаете нужен ли дизайнеру умный агент, который умеет находить решение проблемы из 1000 референсов? Без скролла и поисков. Просто по запросу. Подобная фича есть в Refero. Стало интересно поисследовать что если тянуть рефы вообще ото всюду куда можно дотянуться и может быть учить агента на внутренних библиотеках компании, где работаете или собирать с каждой новой задачей карту по которой можно найти в сотый раз

👀8👍3👎2🔥1

31 Jul 2026, 09:35 UTC266 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

17 человек откликнулось! Почти две группы 🙂 Те кто не попал в первую автоматически записаны во вторую 🥰 думаю также на следующих выходных проведем.

4🔥2

30 Jul 2026, 12:44 UTC310 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

отношения с личным ИИ ассистентом

😁8💔4🙈2

29 Jul 2026, 11:48 UTC454 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

БУДЕМ РИСОВАТЬ ВМЕСТЕ РАЗ В НЕДЕЛЮ? 🤪 Тестируем новый формат Design Drills: двухчасовые созвоны для совместной практики. Недавно я проводил для vondo.ru и Совкомбанка воркшопы на развитие креативности у продуктовых дизайнеров и им зашло) Хочу потестить здесь. Все получают одно упражнение, работают над ним во время звонка, а в конце показывают результаты и обсуждают решения. Так проще практиковаться регулярно, смо

🔥97😍3👏1

29 Jul 2026, 06:50 UTC287 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

блин, так круто смотрятся эти эмоджи в психоделе, как родные вписались!

7😁5🤯2

28 Jul 2026, 12:29 UTC306 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

реалии йоги на открытом воздухе🫠

5😁41

28 Jul 2026, 07:24 UTC303 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

6🔥4👍2😁2

28 Jul 2026, 07:24 UTC279 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Нет, это не Пхукет и не Бали — это Пермь!

🥰2

26 Jul 2026, 18:26 UTC337 views23 reactions81 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

DDRILLS 018 / ICONIC Релиз и тренировка одновременно — да, такое тоже бывает :) 17 июля был всемирный день эмодзи и я решил сделать свой пак сначала на 96 иконок, а потом и вообще все эмодзи. Стиль долбанутый как и наш брендинг 🤪 Бесплатно для подписчиков!! Ссылка внизу, а сначала задание⬇️ Задание: Собери квадратную композицию из пяти эмодзи так, чтобы без текста было понятно, что произошло. Выбери: • эмоцию;

12🔥7😱4

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @ddrills. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“DDRILLS” (@ddrills), 954 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ddrills.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.