Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ENDY

Channel

ENDY

@endybrand

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,480subscribers

+242 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001739408556
TypeChannel
Username@endybrand
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/endybrand

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 60% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

8,2388,4858,361.56 August 2026 — 8,238 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,238 subscribers10 August 2026 — 8,248 subscribers13 August 2026 — 8,267 subscribers16 August 2026 — 8,284 subscribers20 August 2026 — 8,286 subscribers24 August 2026 — 8,288 subscribers27 August 2026 — 8,442 subscribers30 August 2026 — 8,452 subscribers1 September 2026 — 8,470 subscribers5 September 2026 — 8,479 subscribers10 September 2026 — 8,485 subscribers14 September 2026 — 8,483 subscribers18 September 2026 — 8,480 subscribers8,4806 August 202618 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 43 days, net +242. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,201–8,522 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 03:178,480-3
14 Sept 2026, 01:018,483-2
10 Sept 2026, 13:388,485+6
5 Sept 2026, 14:198,479+9
1 Sept 2026, 14:038,470+18
30 Aug 2026, 00:168,452+10
27 Aug 2026, 08:588,442+154
24 Aug 2026, 06:548,288+2
20 Aug 2026, 04:028,286+2
16 Aug 2026, 21:388,284+17
13 Aug 2026, 06:058,267+19
10 Aug 2026, 07:108,248+10
6 Aug 2026, 13:158,238no change
6 Aug 2026, 13:098,238first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 28 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.6%
avg views ÷ 8,480 subscribers
Avg views / post
901
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.37%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held15 (28 July 202628 August 2026)
Views total4,507
Reactions total152
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 17:26 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 07s
Average length
34s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

685 reactions across 15 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
31445.8%
🔥12217.8%
🤩11016.1%
custom 5454166101468401980659.49%
🗿243.50%
👀182.63%
131.90%
121.75%
💅40.584%
custom 545438398515932695830.438%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 685 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 09:28 UTC499 views14 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Вчера сходили на премию для брендов Петербурга от Делового Петербурга, были рады повидаться с фондом «Бумажная птица», для которых сделали ребрендинг, который можно посмотреть у нас на сайте! 🌟

14

28 Aug 2026, 09:17 UTC515 views33 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @children_hospicePhoto

Мы — лауреаты премии «Бренд года» Петербурга ⭐️ «Бумажная птица» вошла в число лауреатов ежегодного «Рейтинга брендов Петербурга» от «Делового Петербурга» — в категории «Восходящие звёзды». Премия отмечает самые заметные и сильные бренды города. Эту награду мы с благодарностью делим с командой ENDY, вместе с которой в этом году полностью изменили визуальный стиль «Бумажной птицы». Когда мы начинали ребрендинг, нам

23🔥5🤩5

27 Aug 2026, 12:13 UTC956 views31 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥17custom 545416610146840198014

24 Aug 2026, 12:21 UTC≈1,560 views67 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Что общего на фотках? 🌟 А это у офиса ENDY появилась своя собственная, именная lapochka — по мотивам нашей игры-путешестивия по России Бегите пробовать, уже в наличии на маркетплейсах!

🤩3020🔥15👀2

21 Aug 2026, 12:03 UTC≈1,690 views39 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

🛸 Слепили ролик о том, как делали настолку для БЛОПТОПа Все началось с теорий заговора в переговорке, а закончилось тем, что мы на полгода ушли с головой в абсурд. Команда БЛОПТОП (те самые, что подарили миру Бибизяну, Шлепу и Хренбоуса) решила не плодить банальный мерч, а сделать с нами настолку про СПГС (синдром поиска глубинного смысла). Спойлер: рассудок сохранили не все, зато получилась нереально крутая игра.

21🔥126

19 Aug 2026, 12:47 UTC≈5,980 views43 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

НЕВТОРКИНГ ENDY ✕ сладенькие вакансии Зовем на конфу про агентский бизнес, дизайн и креатив с эпичным составом спикеров 🔘 Коля Муравьев — автор каналов сладенький редактор и сладенькие вакансии 🔘 Женя Грань — креативный директор ENDY 🔘 Боря Шилин — основатель и CEO проекта «Щёлочь», создатель и резидент музыкального лейбла «Саунд» 🔘 Виктор Рындин — фаундер дипрофайла и wemakefab + секретный гость, чтобы добавит

28🔥8🤩6🗿1

18 Aug 2026, 08:39 UTC≈1,730 views31 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

ENDY ищет молниеносного супер-фотографа в Питере Нам нужен репортажный фотограф сегодня на мероприятие в Комарово. Ищем человека, готового к спонтанному приключению (за деньги). Если это вы или ваши друзья, пишите скорее @slavyanskiytort. С нас оплата+вайб+бесконечная благодарность+еда 💛

custom 545416610146840198017🔥10🗿3🤩1

17 Aug 2026, 08:04 UTC≈1,600 views34 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @sweetmartinvacanciesPhoto

👅 Кого читать в дизайне 2.0 помните, где-то полгода назад мы делали подборку личных каналов разных спецов индустрии? так вот, решили бахнуть вторую часть. собрали в нее медиа о дизайне, каналы студий, которые реал непозорно читать (и ваки туда кидают тож), и шрифтовикам и типографистам (храни их бог) дали чутка внимания, а то все их обычно стороной обходят, а ваще-то это благодаря им у нас больше 5 нормальных шрифт

custom 54541661014684019801810💅4🗿2

14 Aug 2026, 09:05 UTC≈1,510 views83 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Cчитаем доживших до пятницы в офисе 😒

52👀16🗿12🤩2custom 54541661014684019801

11 Aug 2026, 13:03 UTC≈1,880 views74 reactionsread 26 August 2026
Photo

🟡 Путь из стажера в полноценного ENDY-хьюмана Мы часто проводим стажировки, а самые стойкие, смелые и умелые ребята остаются с нами и получают место в штате ENDY. И за последние время таких историй накопилось много. Поэтому мы решили сделать серию постов, в которых бывшие стажеры расскажут, что им помогло меньше стрессовать и больше кайфовать во время стажировки, да еще и остаться в штате. Первым делом заглянули в

42🔥16custom 545416610146840198010🗿6

5 Aug 2026, 13:20 UTC≈1,930 views68 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Video

Как узнать ENDY-хьюмана в толпе? По одежке! Мы создаем креативные коллекции мерча для крупных брендов, но самая большая вселенная шмоток собралась внутри самого агентства. Его нельзя купить или заказать на сайте, каждый айтем мы с командой создаем и дарим в важные даты. 💫 Раньше за два месяца успешной стажировки в ENDY давали ремня. Теперь даем обвес-открывашку для пива. 💫 За первый год — именной жетон с датой выхо

37🔥19🤩12

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @endybrand. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 13 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

поле
@poledsgn · 22,517
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 20 September 2026
Связь Вишневского
@pokamojno · 24,171
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 16 September 2026
гура́
@creativeee · 61,473
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 21 August 2026
mads media
@mads_courses · 26,050
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 13 September 2026
ХОТ ДИДЖИТАЛ от Влада Ситникова
@HotDigital · 23,545
Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 18 September 2026
Студия Артемия Лебедева
@artlebedev · 22,083
Telegram ranks this channel #93 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 21 September 2026

This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ENDY” (@endybrand), 8,480 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/endybrand.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.