Channel
@deIban
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
21,708subscribers
-618 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001329436668 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @deIban |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 21 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 45 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 21 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/deIban |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 41% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 21 Oct 2026, 12:00 | 21,708 | -10 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 12:31 | 21,718 | -7 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 10:56 | 21,725 | -5 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 13:55 | 21,730 | -11 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 17:28 | 21,741 | -6 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 20:26 | 21,747 | -15 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 21:34 | 21,762 | -5 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 00:38 | 21,767 | -8 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 20:46 | 21,775 | -23 |
| 10 Oct 2026, 05:36 | 21,798 | -33 |
| 6 Oct 2026, 02:39 | 21,831 | -45 |
| 30 Sept 2026, 18:20 | 21,876 | -87 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 05:56 | 21,963 | -14 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 03:38 | 21,977 | -8 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 13:41 | 21,985 | -8 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 00:38 | 21,993 | -19 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 03:18 | 22,012 | -27 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 08:20 | 22,039 | -37 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 06:20 | 22,076 | -16 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 09:16 | 22,092 | first reading |
318 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 69 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 318 (4 August 2026 – 12 October 2026) |
| Views total | 140,304 |
| Reactions total | 2,777 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Oct 2026, 10:26 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
8,587 reactions across 318 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 8,587 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 318 of the 318 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,587 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 318 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 12 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
من آدمی نیستم که از رفتن کسی ناراحت شم و گریه کنم، خودمو اذیت کنم، افسرده شم؛ نه من همچین آدمی نیستم، شاید قبلا بودم ولی الان نه! منِ امروز خیلی با منِ چند سال پیش فرق داره، این من نه از رفتن کسی ناراحت نه از اومدن کسی خوشحال میشه، یه حالت همیشه خنثی داره! چون نمیخواد زندگیشو، حال خوبشو بخاطر بقیه خراب کنه خوب میدونه که چقد قوی و استواره، چقد دربرابر مشکلات قویِ و هیچی از پا درنمیارتش، پس نه چیزی براش مهمه نه کسی! ای…
❤9
فردی برای رابطه مناسبه که این ویژگی ها رو داشته باشه : - هیچوقت طوری رفتار نمیکنه که انگار تو مقصری و وقتی کار اشتباهی میکنه عذر خواهی میکنه - هیچوقت از طرز فکر و رفتارت ایراد نمیگیره و تورو به چالش نمیکشونه - به عادت ها و سلیقه های تو احترام میذاره و طوری وانمود نمیکنه که حس کنی احمق و عجیبی - وقتی توی ظاهرت تغییر ایجاد میکنی متوجه میشه. @DeIban
❤7
وقتی یکیو دوس داری وقتایی که باهاش میگذرونی بدنت شروع میکنه به ترشح دوپامین و اکسی توسین و مغزت به این حس عادت میکنه، وقتی از دستش بدی بدن درد میگیری و بدنت خواهان همون مواد شیمیاییه که حالتو خوب کنن به زبونِ ساده تر تو معتاد اون و حسی که بهت داده شدی. @DeIban
❤10
«کُونوا نُورًا لمن تَحبّون.» نور باشید، برای کسانی که دوست دارید. صبح بخیر♡ @DeIban
❤14
خیلی ساده بگم اکثر ما تبحر خاصی تو فریب دادن خودمون داریم. حقیقت رو می دونیم ولی هزار دلیل تو مغز و قلب مون می سازیم که حقیقت رو قبول نکنیم. می دونیم اطرافمون داره چه اتفاقاتی میفته ولی چشمامون رو می بندیم و طوری خروپف می کنیم که انگار خواب خوابیم. که انگار هیچی نمی فهمیم. ما با فریب دادن خودمون دنبال آرامشیم... دنبال فرار از فکر و خیال ... ولی یه روز، یه جا دیگه با فریب دادن خودمون هم آرامش به دست نمیاریم. اون وقت د…
❤17
❤️🩹- لطفاً شعور اتمام رابطه رو داشته باشیم، مثلا میتونیم بگیم... : 1-من واقعا دوست داشتم که بیشتر باهات آشنا بشم ولی هیچ ارتباطی بینمون حس نمیکنم، ممنون که وقتت رو به من اختصاص دادی. 2- در حال حاضر انقدر سرم شلوغه و درگیر زندگیمم که توانایی اولویت بندی رابطمون رو ندارم. 3- این رابطه به درد من نمیخوره، امیدوارم که درکم کنی. 4- دیگه نمیتونم سر ..... باهات باشم، لطفاً به تصمیمم احترام بزار. 5- احساس میکنم تو این رابطه…
❤8
من از جملهی « فدای سرت » خیلی خوشم میاد، بهم حس امنیت میده. اینجوریه که فدای سرت داری گند میزنی به همه چیز، فدای سرت غذا سوخت، فدای سرت چای ریخت، فدای سرت نمرهت کم شد، فدای سرت نتونستی، فدای سرت نشد، نرسید، نرفتی، نیومد؛ فدای سرت. @DeIban
❤21
وقتی یکیو خیلی دوست داری همه ی فکر و ذکرت میشه اون، حال خوب اون، خندیدن اون، اینکه اون راحت بخوابه، تو آرامش باشه، چشماش خندون باشه، خوب غذا بخوره، مواظب باشی عصبی نشه وقتی یکیو خیلی دوست داری، همه ی زندگیت میشه اون و فکر اون عین من که تک تک لحظه هامو بهت فکر میکنم و همیشه حواسم بهت هست. @DeIban
❤12
اینُ پین کنین و برای خودتون داشته باشین؛ از تنهایی نترسید، از اینکه دایره اطرافیانتون کوچیک بشه نترسید، از اینکه با آدم ها کم رفت و آمد کنید نترسید یا کنار گذاشته بشید نترسید، از این بترسید که توسط ِآدم هایی احاطه بشید که دوزاری و بدرد نخورن. همینقدر صریح؛ «دوزاری» کلمه مناسبیه برای ادم هایی که بلد نیستن کی چطور رفتار کنن و چی بگن و چه چیزی رو به زبون بیارن. نترسید اگه چارچوبتون رو حفظ کنید و طرد بشید باور کنید آدم ه…
❤29
تو رابطت اینطوری حرف بزن تا حرفات تاثیرگذار باشه: نگو هر جور راحتی. بگو اگه اینطوری حس بهتری داری،باشه. نگو نمیخوای حرف بزنی؟ بگو اگه دوست داشتی من میخوام حرفاتو بشنوم. نگو چقدر گشاد و تنبلی. بگو میشه بیشتر تلاش کنی؟ من بهت ایمان دارم. نگو چرا نمیفهمی من چی میگم؟ بگو میشه لطفاً به حرفام بیشتر دقت کنی؟ نگو کاش میفهمیدی چی میگم. بگو کاش این موضوع رو از زاویه دید منم ببینی. نگو کارات رو اعصابمه. بگو لطفا این شکلی نکن، …
❤12
اینکه اخلاقای بد و تاکسیکت رو بپذیری و سعی کنی کنترل و درمانشون کنی نشونه بلوغ فکریته. کسایی که فک میکنن خداان و هیچ عیبی ندارن درحالی که همه چیو میندازن گردن بقیه، واقعا غیر قابل تحملن. @DeIban
❤21
«صَباح الخير لِعَينيك البَعيدتين.» صبحِ چشمهای دور از مَنَت بهخیر.🌱 صبح بخیر♡ @DeIban
❤9
Showing the 12 most recent of 318 posts we hold for @deIban. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 22 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝐷𝑒𝑙𝑏𝑎𝑛” (@deIban), 21,708 subscribers as measured 21 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/deIban.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.