🚀new proxy🚀 🌐sᴇʀᴠᴇʀ › unknown 🔌 ᴘᴏʀᴛ › 25565 🔓sᴇᴄʀᴇᴛ › ee104462821249bd7ac519130220c25d0963646e2e79656b74616e65742e636f6d To SeT : Connect Proxy _________________________ 🆔 @ProxyMTProto_tel

Channel
Proxy MTProto
@ProxyMTProto_tel
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · View velocity · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,243,718subscribers
-1,878 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among the largest entries.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001203971745 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ProxyMTProto_tel |
| Description | FAST MTPROTO PROXIES FOR TELEGRAM Desktop v1.2.18+ macOS v3.8.3+ Android v4.8.8+ X Android v0.20.10.931+ iOS v4.8.2+ Ads 👇👇 @tab_sponsor_proxy #DigitalResistance Build your own MTProxy: https://github.com/TelegramMessenger/MTProxy |
| Created | 4 January 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 29 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ProxyMTProto_tel |
Topic
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 63% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Sept 2026, 19:20 | 1,243,718 | -985 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 12:18 | 1,244,703 | +3,638 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 12:59 | 1,241,065 | -395 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 04:06 | 1,241,460 | -268 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 01:17 | 1,241,728 | -370 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 22:23 | 1,242,098 | -301 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 20:23 | 1,242,399 | -209 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 22:56 | 1,242,608 | -334 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 21:42 | 1,242,942 | -279 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 23:53 | 1,243,221 | -414 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 22:34 | 1,243,635 | -382 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 19:08 | 1,244,017 | -537 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 02:18 | 1,244,554 | -599 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 14:15 | 1,245,153 | -426 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 11:06 | 1,245,579 | -322 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 10:03 | 1,245,901 | -194 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 11:22 | 1,246,095 | -115 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 10:47 | 1,246,210 | +1,655 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 19:08 | 1,244,555 | -620 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 05:57 | 1,245,175 | first reading |
Engagement
433 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 81 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 6.86%
- avg views ÷ 1,243,718 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 85,300
- 368 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 368
- of 433 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 433 (4 August 2026 – 9 September 2026) |
| Views total | 31,401,900 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Sept 2026, 11:06 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈4,150
- Videos
- ≈1,160
- Links
- ≈32,000
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
View velocity
How fast this channel’s own posts pick up views, from re-reading them repeatedly in the hours and days after they were published rather than the single reading most entries on this register get. Coverage is early and only a small minority of channels hold it at all — a gap in this section means the post has not been re-read again yet, not that nothing happened.
Computed from 377 of this channel’s own posts over the last 30 days (4 of the 24-hour readings behind this are interpolated, not measured directly): across 353 of this channel’s own posts with a clear reading, a typical one reaches half of its last-observed view count within 9.0 hours of being posted; a typical post has already reached 17.2% of its 24-hour view count within the first hour, and 61.8% within the first six; the median 24-hour reach across those posts is 60,200 views — 4.84% of this channel’s own subscriber count (90th percentile 69,140).
| Post | Readings | Latest reading | Curve | 24h reach | Half of last-observed views by |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| /1114149 Sept 2026, 10:02 UTC | 233 minutes – 63 minutes old | 10,600 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 10,178 interp. | not yet at 24h | 33 minutesupper bound — already past half at first reading · provisional — final view count still climbing |
| /1114139 Sept 2026, 08:41 UTC | 515 minutes – 2.4 hours old | 21,400 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 10,506 interp.still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 62 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /1114129 Sept 2026, 08:40 UTC | 515 minutes – 2.4 hours old | 19,200 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 10,211 interp.still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 55 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /1114119 Sept 2026, 06:51 UTC | 825 minutes – 4.2 hours old | 27,700 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 8,860 → 3.0 hours: 21,474 interp.still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 1.8 hoursprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /1114109 Sept 2026, 05:27 UTC | 118 minutes – 5.6 hours old | 32,300 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 7,839 interp. → 3.0 hours: 20,200still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 2.2 hoursprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /1114098 Sept 2026, 21:08 UTC | 2634 minutes – 14 hours old | 49,300 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 10,603 interp. → 3.0 hours: 14,809 interp. → 6.0 hours: 19,400 → 12 hours: 43,000still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 7.8 hoursprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /1114088 Sept 2026, 20:35 UTC | 2731 minutes – 15 hours old | 51,000 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 14,632 interp. → 3.0 hours: 21,627 interp. → 6.0 hours: 24,900 → 12 hours: 44,500still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 6.4 hoursprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /1114078 Sept 2026, 19:38 UTC | 294 minutes – 15 hours old | 55,200 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 15,578 interp. → 3.0 hours: 30,391 interp. → 6.0 hours: 33,000 → 12 hours: 48,700still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 2.2 hoursprovisional — final view count still climbing |
Curve is every standard checkpoint we hold a reading for (+1h, +3h, +6h, +12h, +24h, +48h, +7d after posting) — measured where a real reading landed close enough to that age, interpolated where it did not but readings on both sides let one be worked out between them. Nothing is ever extrapolated past the last real reading. Latest reading is the newest view and reaction count we hold for the post, side by side, so a gap between how views and reactions moved is visible without following it into the Observations section above. 24h reach is that one checkpoint on its own, labelled the same way. Half of last-observed views is the age at which a post’s view count crossed half of the highest figure we have read for it so far — an upper bound when the very first reading was already past half (we cannot see the actual crossing), and biased low while the post is still climbing, since “half of final” is dividing by a number that has not finished growing yet. Both caveats are printed inline wherever they apply, never silently dropped.
Recent posts
جهت دریافت لینک کانال عمومی روی لینک پایین کلیک کنید 👇🏻 https://t.me/signal_crypto_forex_mohtasham ادمین کانال 👇🏻👩💼 https://t.me/signal_mohtasham
🚀new proxy🚀 🌐sᴇʀᴠᴇʀ › unknown 🔌 ᴘᴏʀᴛ › 25565 🔓sᴇᴄʀᴇᴛ › ee104462821249bd7ac519130220c25d0963646e2e79656b74616e65742e636f6d To SeT : Connect Proxy _________________________ 🆔 @ProxyMTProto_tel
🚀new proxy🚀 🌐sᴇʀᴠᴇʀ › unknown 🔌 ᴘᴏʀᴛ › 25565 🔓sᴇᴄʀᴇᴛ › ee104462821249bd7ac519130220c25d0963646e2e79656b74616e65742e636f6d To SeT : Connect Proxy _________________________ 🆔 @ProxyMTProto_tel
🚀new proxy🚀 🌐sᴇʀᴠᴇʀ › unknown 🔌 ᴘᴏʀᴛ › 25565 🔓sᴇᴄʀᴇᴛ › ee104462821249bd7ac519130220c25d0963646e2e79656b74616e65742e636f6d To SeT : Connect Proxy _________________________ 🆔 @ProxyMTProto_tel
🚀new proxy🚀 🌐sᴇʀᴠᴇʀ › unknown 🔌 ᴘᴏʀᴛ › 443 🔓sᴇᴄʀᴇᴛ › ddf0eeb0bd9adc4fd4a93994ee3b2a216b To SeT : Connect Proxy _________________________ 🆔 @ProxyMTProto_tel
🚀new proxy🚀 🌐sᴇʀᴠᴇʀ › unknown 🔌 ᴘᴏʀᴛ › 8443 🔓sᴇᴄʀᴇᴛ › eeNEgYdJvXrFGRMCIMJdCQ To SeT : Connect Proxy _________________________ 🆔 @ProxyMTProto_tel
🚀new proxy🚀 🌐sᴇʀᴠᴇʀ › unknown 🔌 ᴘᴏʀᴛ › 443 🔓sᴇᴄʀᴇᴛ › eef0eeb0bd9adc4fd4a93994ee3b2a216b63646e2e79656b74616e65742e636f6d To SeT : Connect Proxy _________________________ 🆔 @ProxyMTProto_tel
🚀new proxy🚀 🌐sᴇʀᴠᴇʀ › unknown 🔌 ᴘᴏʀᴛ › 443 🔓sᴇᴄʀᴇᴛ › eef0eeb0bd9adc4fd4a93994ee3b2a216b63646e2e79656b74616e65742e636f6d To SeT : Connect Proxy _________________________ 🆔 @ProxyMTProto_tel
🚀new proxy🚀 🌐sᴇʀᴠᴇʀ › unknown 🔌 ᴘᴏʀᴛ › 443 🔓sᴇᴄʀᴇᴛ › eef0eeb0bd9adc4fd4a93994ee3b2a216b63646e2e79656b74616e65742e636f6d To SeT : Connect Proxy _________________________ 🆔 @ProxyMTProto_tel
🚀new proxy🚀 🌐sᴇʀᴠᴇʀ › unknown 🔌 ᴘᴏʀᴛ › 443 🔓sᴇᴄʀᴇᴛ › eef0eeb0bd9adc4fd4a93994ee3b2a216b63646e2e79656b74616e65742e636f6d To SeT : Connect Proxy _________________________ 🆔 @ProxyMTProto_tel
🚀new proxy🚀 🌐sᴇʀᴠᴇʀ › unknown 🔌 ᴘᴏʀᴛ › 8443 🔓sᴇᴄʀᴇᴛ › eeNEgYdJvXrFGRMCIMJdCQ To SeT : Connect Proxy _________________________ 🆔 @ProxyMTProto_tel
Showing the 12 most recent of 433 posts we hold for @ProxyMTProto_tel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@drkhaleqi · 1585 postsکانال رسمی آزمایشگاه ژنتیک پزشکی دکتر خالقیان
@drkhaleqian · 1494 postsاخبار منتخب پروکسی رایگانproxy
@proxychanal2027 · 1184 postsدعاهای قرآنی
@Mahsulate_khunegi · 23 posts💏 اسرار💝 جنسی 💏
@arameshjensi · 202 postsلایو ترید اندیکاتور پیشرو
@andicatorpishro · 61 postAtu Food
@atufood · 3971 postموبایل ایراتل
@behrooztavana · 111 post~°Hobby~°
@hoppy81 · 31 postLinkpin
@LinkPin · 811 postPeyman.tatoo.mashhad
@tatoomashhad2016 · 801 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 21 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@drkhaleqi · 1585 postsکانال رسمی آزمایشگاه ژنتیک پزشکی دکتر خالقیان
@drkhaleqian · 1494 postsاخبار منتخب پروکسی رایگانproxy
@proxychanal2027 · 1184 postsدعاهای قرآنی
@Mahsulate_khunegi · 23 posts💏 اسرار💝 جنسی 💏
@arameshjensi · 202 postsتبلیغات اسپانسری بنری
@bazdehi_tablighat · 1,2882 postsلایو ترید اندیکاتور پیشرو
@andicatorpishro · 61 postAtu Food
@atufood · 3971 postموبایل ایراتل
@behrooztavana · 111 postCPMshort.com
@CPMshort · 2841 postDntn life style
@DntnDS · 681 postDomitrix Trading
@domitrixtrading · 41 post~°Hobby~°
@hoppy81 · 31 postLinkpin
@LinkPin · 811 postiranbusinessmentor
@mansourhomayouninejad · 31 postمیم | محمد مهدی
@Mmehdi_ir · 2561 postPishgam Data
@pishgamdata · 1771 post🔮 Nee–moh | Нима!
@realm_of_neemoh · 1231 postتبلیغات اسپانسری بنری
@tab_sponsor_proxy · 3,4621 postPeyman.tatoo.mashhad
@tatoomashhad2016 · 801 postThalaShort.com
@Thala_Short · 2681 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@iMTProto · 7,482,595#1
@iRoProxy · 7,910,445#2
@telmtproto · 2,530,880#3
@Myporoxy · 4,487,728#4
@MTProxyStar · 1,947,576#5
@drproxy_channel · 501,344#6
@mtp_roto · 1,633,962#7
@proxy_qavi · 3,453,557#8
@darkproxy · 4,817,504#9
@proxydaemi · 1,756,552#10
@PinkProxy · 2,039,728#11
@Forall_Proxy · 843,337#12
@NPROXY · 2,448,015#13
@irproxy · 1,285,388#14
@beshkan_proxy · 72,128#15
@Chrome_Proxy · 497,800#16
@Nobitexmag · 148,931#17
@PyroProxy · 424,251#18
@ProxyHagh · 401,131#19
@MemeHubOriginal · 98,981#20
@roidbest · 1,651,782#21
@nobitexmarket · 319,887#22
@proxymtprotoj · 529,067#23
@NextGenProxy · 171,430#24
@PowerfulProxy · 290,337#25
@hideproxi2 · 366,480#26
@WizProxy · 87,441#27
@Cheetah_MTP · 356,534#28
@mineproxy · 281,811#29
@outline_vpn · 697,606#30
@Filtereshekan · 907,238#31
@turbo_mtproxy · 67,768#32
@secret_proxy · 56,990#33
@proxymtproto · 11,950,489#34
@notcoin · 8,803,455#35
@theyescoin · 5,828,260#36
@RegaPlus · 1,463,288#37
@varzesh3 · 1,294,838#38
@TimeFarmChannel · 5,414,355#39
@futballbadtv · 323,647#40
@catapult_extreme · 8,681,649#41
@hayzonn · 2,886,200#42
@razcom · 1,237,225#43
@trendingapps · 3,864,524#44
@hamclasixii · 41#45
@CEXIO_Announcements · 2,551,951#46
@ahangify · 4,223,802#47
@hexnio · 2,032,331#48
@rapking · 307,017#49
@bistodo · 391,229#50
@drtel · 770,403#51
@cryptonews_lessons · 93,437#52
@proxymtprotoir · 3,157,095#53
@TweetyChannel · 785,953#54
@officialpersiatwiter · 567,642#55
@HipHopTweety · 201,708#56
@vaarzesh_plus · 327,150#57
@melodio · 2,224,678#58
@Crypto_Woolf · 2,233,704#59
@iranintltv · 1,366,255#60
@Robolandio · 176,198#61
@dollar_tehran3bze · 647,622#62
@Radiokocsher · 882,320#63
@dogs · 7,196,362#64
@blumcrypto · 14,700,866#65
@hamster_kombat · 21,257,954#66
@boomloudcoin · 1,696,451#67
@rockyrabbitio · 3,557,418#68
@seedupdates · 8,363,920#69
@fx_holding_community · 6,226,119#70
@tapswapai · 10,541,428#71
@builders · 3,470,622#72
@gram · 6,785,001#73
@dotcoincommunity · 4,046,866#74
@theTapCoins · 2,972,009#75
@corn_battles · 1,062,254#76
@babydogecoin · 1,034,620#77
@gameechannel · 1,925,980#78
@the_vertus · 2,182,119#79
@watbird · 1,504,082#80
@diamoremarket · 338,996#81
@biznest0n · 683,905#82
@YouBgo · 100,708#83
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 8 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@iTopProxy · 32,103
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 5 September 2026
@Proxy_Tel · 40,886
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 30 August 2026
@old_proxy · 43,823
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 28 August 2026
@secret_proxy · 56,990
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 23 August 2026
@proxy_active · 67,608
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 20 August 2026
@WizProxy · 87,441
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 17 August 2026
@NextGenProxy · 171,430
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 12 August 2026
@drproxy_channel · 501,344
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 9 August 2026
@internetproxy · 36,562
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 1 September 2026
@psiphonproxy · 49,378
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 25 August 2026
@turbo_mtproxy · 67,768
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 20 August 2026
@vpnturbo_proxy · 32,193
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 5 September 2026
@nord_mtproxy · 39,914
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 30 August 2026
@outline_vpn · 697,606
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 8 August 2026
@telmtproto · 2,530,880
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 7 August 2026
@NordProxi · 30,877
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 38 here — alongside 37 others — read 6 September 2026
@proxymtproto · 11,950,489
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 7 August 2026
@tweetproto · 34,351
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 3 September 2026
@Lion_MTProto · 40,581
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 30 August 2026
@MPrxy · 58,643
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 23 August 2026
@PrivateVPNs · 165,225
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 12 August 2026
@Chrome_Proxy · 497,800
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 9 August 2026
@MTProxyStar · 1,947,576
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 7 August 2026
@Ferifox_proxy · 35,235
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 2 September 2026
This channel appears in 114 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Proxy MTProto” (@ProxyMTProto_tel), 1,243,718 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ProxyMTProto_tel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.