گمانم چشمِ او ساحر شده، افسونگرِ جادو به لبهایم نمیآید کلامی، جز خودش یا او!

Channel
❥Delbari
@delbari
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
411,724subscribers
-11,308 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 316,228–1,000,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001389822293 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @delbari @delbrie |
| Description | تو تکیه گاه امن منی میان هر غم و اندوهی. یه چنل برای تو و نیمه گمشدت 🌱 تبلیغات : @NoronAd |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 71 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/delbari |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 60% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Oct 2026, 02:40 | 411,724 | -7 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 00:56 | 411,731 | +1,889 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 07:21 | 409,842 | -23 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 04:58 | 409,865 | +928 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 20:58 | 408,937 | -663 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 10:38 | 409,600 | -395 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 12:59 | 409,995 | -519 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 10:20 | 410,514 | -337 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 15:19 | 410,851 | -363 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 19:18 | 411,214 | -343 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 01:18 | 411,557 | -590 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 00:01 | 412,147 | -534 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 03:37 | 412,681 | +2,950 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 15:19 | 409,731 | +1,508 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 07:38 | 408,223 | -787 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 05:59 | 409,010 | -447 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 23:58 | 409,457 | -469 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 00:19 | 409,926 | -329 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 08:18 | 410,255 | -192 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 17:55 | 410,447 | first reading |
Engagement
418 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 154 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 4.93%
- avg views ÷ 411,724 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 20,300
- 214 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 214
- of 418 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 418 (1 August 2026 – 5 October 2026) |
| Views total | 4,341,900 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Oct 2026, 02:38 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈2,920
- Videos
- ≈1,120
- Links
- ≈84
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 11m 47s
- Average length
- 13s
Measured directly from 53 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
💌 مشترک گرامی! بستهی «دلتنگی نامحدود» شما فعال شد. از این لحظه هر جا برید، یکی هست که الکی الکی دلش براتون تنگ میشه. اون یکی منم.
تو بهترین قسمت این روزای منی. @Delbari
لاسای +۱۸ 😑
قربون سلول به سلول بدنت برمم شد قربون صدقه و لاس ؟ :) برای مخ زنی هات و قوی باید بلد باشی چطوری لاس بزنی من خودم از اینجا یاد گرفتم؛ @love 🤤
رابطه تعهد میخواد، اخلاق میخواد، توجه میخواد، اولویت بودن میخواد، حرمت نگه داشتن و احترام دو طرفه میخواد تا وقتی اینارو یاد نگرفتی وارد رابطه نشو.
Me and you. @Delbari
نگو خوشگلِ بی اعصاب؛ بگو قندهار.
قهوه خوردم، باز خوابم میرسید ممه دیدم، خواب هم از من رمید بوسه میخواهم، نه شربت، ای عزیز قند را بردار و جایش بوسه ریز نسخهام را دکتر از بر مینوشت «بوسه» را با خطِ بدتر مینوشت...
یه پلیلیست پیدا کردیم که احتمالاً نباید نصفهشب پلیش کنی. Playlist
دعوا کنید قهر کنید بحث کنید اینا چیزای عجیبی نیس تو ارتباطات ولی ذوق همو کور نکنید!
تورو خدا نرو به پات میوفتم نرو. @Delbari
Showing the 12 most recent of 418 posts we hold for @delbari. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 37 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@Rohiyat · 97,88731 postsزنان باسیاست
@zanan_basiyasat · 70,99329 postsخُمارِ تو "
@Khomareto · 32,47527 postsMOON | معنی تتو
@IMOONSAD · 212,66515 posts‹آرومِـ دِلَمـ🌱›
@arome_Delam · 49,5837 postsمحافظ بغل
@Baghalu · 57 postsiRo Proxy | پروکسی
@iRoProxy · 7,919,9626 posts[آسو]
@aaso_channel · 19,4754 posts˼ بیو گرافۍ˹
@Biohamm · 18,8384 postsچامه؛
@chameh_ir · 15,7414 postsمحافظ جان دلم
@jaane_delam · 174 postsمال منی♥️
@MaleManiY · 29,3014 postsنینی گوگولـی🐣
@Nini_Gogooli · 45,2844 postsدل گرافے
@Cafe_BioO · 5,4933 posts“dementia“
@Thedementia · 78,4003 postsمحافظ
@timemoodz1 · 1033 postsکارتون | انیمیشن
@WatchCartoon · 262,7193 postsقفل ژوان
@zhovanine · 833 postsروانشناسی | نبوغ سبز
@Green_Genius · 224,9412 postsنیلوفر آبی مرداب
@niloyemordab · 39,0972 postsعشقِ من ؛
@TheLovez · 20,1852 posts[TurkishMusicDl]
@turkishmusicdl · 36,0242 postsمینی شعر
@minii_shear · 53,9441 post" [ C C U ] "
@Signal_ccu · 5711 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@LoveU · 3,0903 postsAkasi عکاسی
@akasi · 1062 postsAway From The Earth
@awayfromthe_earth · 7,0792 postsAlphaTime | آلفا تایم
@alphatime026 · 14,0491 postآموزش سیاه قلم | سمیرا جعفری
@amozesh_jafari · 7201 postEspañol para todos🇪🇸🌹
@aprender2026conSama · 1641 postشعر و مشاعره
@moshere · 23,9591 postافزایش کیفیت عکس
@PhotoAi_robot · 202,6991 post🫧🧋فیزیولوژیستِ نازِ°🍓°
@physiologystnaz · 1,6261 postprompt 🤖 AI News
@prompt · 13,1601 post»وّآستآلٓآشّیْ«
@sosiss · 31 post818
@teenaaam · 1,3441 postتولیدی پوشاک تهرانی فر
@tehranifar1 · 14,6551 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 3
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 3
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@delbari named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 30 September 2026 – 30 September 2026
named in 1 post, 20 September 2026 – 20 September 2026
named in 1 post, 29 August 2026 – 29 August 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@Afkar · 1,022,697#1
@darkproxy · 4,659,865#2
@TweetyChannel · 790,927#3
@proxy_qavi · 3,358,029#4
@Comentiat · 381,685#5
@zhovanine · 83#6
@Radiokocsher · 1,022,668#7
@Herochnl · 404,242#8
@drtel · 778,862#9
@Myelma · 113,250#10
@Loavma · 367,705#11
@seshot6 · 469,863#12
@officialpersiatwiter · 568,216#13
@vazeiyatsefid · 143,309#14
@MemeHubOriginal · 96,126#15
@TheShear · 434#16
@liwish · 177,752#17
@Codeain · 341,592#18
@Lo_v5 · 124,871#19
@sogoandfuckyourlove · 549,563#20
@funhiphop · 258,206#21
@Lov_eu · 50,886#22
@Duchar · 242,602#23
@zho0van · 68,643#24
@dort_begardam_ke · 95,944#25
@cactos · 265,415#26
@HiProxy · 289,794#27
@badgram · 624,343#28
@ParsTwt · 497,345#29
@Zahne_Aram · 255,503#30
@iRoProxy · 7,919,962#31
@iMTProto · 7,594,772#32
@bistodo · 386,419#33
@futballbadtv · 342,767#34
@proxydaemi · 1,748,718#35
@RegaPlus · 1,486,687#36
@FutballBadBoys · 107,134#37
@rapking · 308,369#38
@razcom · 1,225,294#39
@cryptonews_lessons · 91,160#40
@hamclasixii · 76#41
@SportBaadNews · 884,834#42
@bistodo_tweet · 28,635#43
@HipHopTweety · 222,325#44
@ir_javan · 637,308#45
@irproxy · 1,276,473#46
@unja_kee · 418,472#47
@chekhabarre · 243,758#48
@hip_hopi · 309,352#49
@ahangify · 4,228,959#50
@PyroProxy · 419,413#51
@akh_mam · 182,366#52
@NPROXY · 2,365,388#53
@Ye_DaneshAmoz · 935,917#54
@classicthemes · 503,162#55
@lwall_3Dl · 188,616#56
@nikotiinn_text · 457,587#57
@Maagas · 699,902#58
@FUTBALLI18 · 484,845#59
@EfshaKhabar · 274,784#60
@MARIZMEDIA · 55,962#61
@tweet_Khabari · 629,881#62
@timemoodz1 · 103#63
@proxymtprotoir · 3,241,425#64
@wallpaper_4k3d · 556,412#65
@vaarzesh_plus · 326,389#66
@proxymtproto · 11,907,385#67
@varzesh3 · 1,294,820#68
@Myporoxy · 4,504,040#69
@Barca_We · 169,669#70
@EsteghlalFc_We · 147,337#71
@roidbest · 1,637,547#72
@Realmadrid_we · 138,344#73
@tweet_varzeshplus · 32,477#74
@bistodo_ir · 141,668#75
@Nobitexmag · 148,468#76
@TvMali · 14,164#77
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 10 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@zho0van · 68,643
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 20 August 2026
@vazeiyatsefid · 143,309
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 12 August 2026
@ko_Onjdelii · 21,784
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 22 September 2026
@Delbaronhe · 54,962
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 24 August 2026
@Lo_v5 · 124,871
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 13 August 2026
@DELUKID · 21,160
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 24 September 2026
@kalammmeziba1234 · 32,944
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 4 September 2026
@DlbareHot · 43,267
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 40 here — alongside 39 others — read 28 August 2026
@Lov_eu · 50,886
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 24 August 2026
@hotloooves · 54,023
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 23 August 2026
@girin · 32,554
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 4 September 2026
@LLOoVE_yOoOU · 37,222
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 31 August 2026
@delbarihaam · 67,634
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 27 August 2026
@najvashear · 67,790
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 20 August 2026
@ehsaspaak · 43,846
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 28 August 2026
@iphotographr · 67,801
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 21 August 2026
@dort_begardam_ke · 95,944
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 16 August 2026
@TxTBiwo · 37,004
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 1 September 2026
@Sheerreno · 232,418
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 16 August 2026
@nb_f4 · 87,519
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 27 August 2026
@Loveleam · 138,210
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 13 August 2026
@rl_hz · 22,125
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 21 September 2026
@minii_shear · 53,944
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 24 August 2026
@hariim_amn · 414
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 25 August 2026
This channel appears in 84 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“❥Delbari” (@delbari), 411,724 subscribers as measured 4 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/delbari.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.