چه وضعیه خدایی پسرامون اسنپ کار میکنن دخترامون ناخن کار و مژه کار ! واقعا با این چس تومن پولایی که در میارین توقع دارین بتونین درست حسابی زندگی کنید و عشق و حال کنید ؟! جای این کصکلک بازیا دو دقیقه وقت بزار بیا کانال زیر عین اب خوردن پول در بیار ! اونم دلاری 🤌 @daramad ❤️

Channel
روحِیّات | روانشناسی
@Rohiyat
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
96,084subscribers
-5,496 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001891272163 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Rohiyat |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 61 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Rohiyat |
Topic
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 49% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Nov 2026, 13:26 | 96,084 | -55 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 12:25 | 96,139 | -37 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 14:20 | 96,176 | -51 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 15:26 | 96,227 | -47 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 13:06 | 96,274 | -66 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 10:37 | 96,340 | -61 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 09:16 | 96,401 | -46 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 10:56 | 96,447 | -32 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 14:28 | 96,479 | -36 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 10:50 | 96,515 | -68 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 09:47 | 96,583 | -40 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 08:16 | 96,623 | -46 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 08:45 | 96,669 | -49 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 11:40 | 96,718 | -83 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 11:31 | 96,801 | -71 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 08:07 | 96,872 | -67 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 02:37 | 96,939 | -83 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 21:49 | 97,022 | -50 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 23:58 | 97,072 | -58 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 01:18 | 97,130 | first reading |
Engagement
1,544 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 247 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.789%
- avg views ÷ 96,084 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 758
- 481 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 482
- of 1,544 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 1,544 (5 August 2026 – 6 November 2026) |
| Views total | 364,796 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Nov 2026, 10:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 38m 21s
- Average length
- 45s
Measured directly from 51 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 482 posts held from the last 30 days (0.415%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
دو ماهه نامزد کردیم ، هر بار میریم خرید خجالت میکشیدم باهاش برم لباس زیر بخرم ، اونم هعی میگفت مطمئنی چیز دیگه ای نمیخوای ، منم میپیچوندم ، دیروز پیام داده بسته ات امروز میرسه دستت گفتم چیه گفت نه باید خودت ببینی ، یکم قبل رسیده دستم باورم نمیشه این دو تا ست خوشگل و برام خریده ، با خجالت پیام دادم اینا چیه ، نوشته خب ما الان نامزدیم خجالت نداره که ، دفعه دیگه اصلا با هم انتخاب می کنیم ، گفتم از کجا گرفتی اصلا…
🔴تصاویری از انفجار قشم :
🔴 قشم هم اکنون
🔴 انفجار در قشم و عسلویه:
🔴نمیخوام جو بدم یا ته دل کسی رو خالی کنم ولی این چنلو داشته باشید بدونید چخبره آیدیش: @khabar
اتش بس نقض شدددددد فکنم امشب جنگ شدت بگیره اخبار واقعی رو اینجا بخونید: @Khabar
دو ماهه نامزد کردیم ، هر بار میریم خرید خجالت میکشیدم باهاش برم لباس زیر بخرم ، اونم هعی میگفت مطمئنی چیز دیگه ای نمیخوای ، منم میپیچوندم ، دیروز پیام داده بسته ات امروز میرسه دستت گفتم چیه گفت نه باید خودت ببینی ، یکم قبل رسیده دستم باورم نمیشه این دو تا ست خوشگل و برام خریده ، با خجالت پیام دادم اینا چیه ، نوشته خب ما الان نامزدیم خجالت نداره که ، دفعه دیگه اصلا با هم انتخاب می کنیم ، گفتم از کجا گرفتی اصلا…
روش هایی که باعث میشه مردم از شما خوششون بیاد و کاریزماتیک دیده بشین ! #پادکست_صوتی #روانشناسی 🌱 روحِیّات :)
دو ماهه نامزد کردیم ، هر بار میریم خرید خجالت میکشیدم باهاش برم لباس زیر بخرم ، اونم هعی میگفت مطمئنی چیز دیگه ای نمیخوای ، منم میپیچوندم ، دیروز پیام داده بسته ات امروز میرسه دستت گفتم چیه گفت نه باید خودت ببینی ، یکم قبل رسیده دستم باورم نمیشه این دو تا ست خوشگل و برام خریده ، با خجالت پیام دادم اینا چیه ، نوشته خب ما الان نامزدیم خجالت نداره که ، دفعه دیگه اصلا با هم انتخاب می کنیم ، گفتم از کجا گرفتی اصلا…
حوصلتون سر رفت با هم اینو جواب بدین کدومتون خاله زنک تره؟ کدومتون بیشتر مریض میشه؟ کدومتون رو رسیدن به خودش حساستره؟ کدومتون بیشتر فیلم میبینه؟ کدومتون بیشتر آهنگ گوش میده؟ کدومتون عاشقِ خوابِ و خوابالوئه؟ کدومتون چاپلوسی رو بهتر بلده؟ کدومتون زبون بازتر و بهتر بلده لاس بزنه؟ کدومتون بهتر تو یه جمع با بقیه رفتار میکنه؟ کدومتون خوش اشتهاتره و همش گرسنهش میشه؟ کدومتون نویسندگیش بهتره؟ کدومتون ممکنه یه خلافکار بشه؟ ک…
🚨 جدال غولها در اروپا! ⚽️❤️🔥 🇳🇱 #آلکمار 🆚 #یوونتوس 🇮🇹 📆 پنجشنبه ۱۴ آبان ⏰ ساعت ۲۱:۰۰ 💣 بونوس ۳ برابری منتظرته! 🎁 فرصت ویژه رو از دست نده؛ با VOREXBET هیجان رو چند برابر کن! 🚀 🤣 (vorexbet.com) 👑کانال بونوسهای رایگان:👇 https://t.me/+7vl7f16PMR42ZjJk 🌐پیشبینی از طریق ربات :💥 @VorexBet_bot
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,544 posts we hold for @Rohiyat. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 91 posts on @Rohiyat as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 7 August 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 5 November 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 17 hours
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 16
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@Ritzobet_ir · 39,59993 postsربات چت ملوگپ
@melogap · 1,581,73580 posts❥Delbari
@delbari · 405,61446 postsMovafaghiat | موفقیت
@Movafaghiat · 23444 postsدرآمد در تلگرام NFT,گیفت،تون
@daramad · 1,08736 postsخبر
@khabar · 80,60630 postsکسب و کار طلا
@kasbokar · 42427 postsانگیزه کنکور📚🍀
@Angizeh_konkore · 166,46014 postsکانال رسمی وی پاری | Wepari iran
@weparig · 75,34114 postsورود به کانال آقای تحلیلگر
@AghayeTahlilgar · 114,24911 postsمل بت
@melbet_chaneel · 36,0218 postsعطرشاپ
@atrshop · 237 postsMelBet | مل بت
@MelBet_Iran1 · 179,0447 postsRomaBet
@Romabet_official · 13,0386 postsViral 🔥 Trending Videos
@Find_Anything_Instantly_1 · 5,6783 postsپست اخر را بخونید
@amozesh_guitar · 362 postsانگيزشی
@angizeshi · 10,6752 postsکانال شرطبندی دربی کلاب
@derbybetm · 156,9622 postsحس خوب آرامش🌱
@Hesse_Arammesh · 79,6812 postsشُڪرِ بے پایان.. 🕊️
@Shokr_Gozari · 4042 postsسوالای دخترونه !
@soal_dokhtaroneh · 81,9042 postsخنده کلیپ سیگنال ارز کالاف پابجی ایردراپ خبر اخبار trump آیسان رایگان سریال آتوسالطیفی یاسی
@chnlvip · 181 postNBA
@NBA2kBet · 29,9961 postZaban زبان
@zaban · 1,0991 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 14
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 14
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@Rohiyat named 14 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 18 posts, 18 August 2026 – 5 November 2026
named in 11 posts, 18 August 2026 – 31 October 2026
named in 8 posts, 2 September 2026 – 6 September 2026
named in 7 posts, 23 August 2026 – 31 October 2026
named in 7 posts, 18 August 2026 – 3 October 2026
named in 4 posts, 16 October 2026 – 6 November 2026
named in 4 posts, 23 August 2026 – 4 November 2026
named in 3 posts, 19 September 2026 – 20 September 2026
named in 2 posts, 20 September 2026 – 30 October 2026
named in 2 posts, 20 August 2026 – 21 August 2026
named in 1 post, 2 November 2026 – 2 November 2026
named in 1 post, 3 October 2026 – 3 October 2026
named in 1 post, 22 September 2026 – 22 September 2026
named in 1 post, 22 September 2026 – 22 September 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@Green_Genius · 229,047#1
@Afkar · 1,016,840#2
@Zahne_Aram · 258,038#3
@darkproxy · 4,580,108#4
@liwish · 178,285#5
@bedemure · 72#6
@tajvizAngize · 298,672#7
@sogoandfuckyourlove · 566,436#8
@Senariochanell · 160#9
@TweetyChannel · 824,489#10
@Myelma · 110,892#11
@vahm_sabz · 157,276#12
@letskills · 83,575#13
@iciou · 287,977#14
@MasteMaqmom · 26,025#15
@Lyricsteach · 40,407#16
@irobah · 23,687#17
@Zhakav_Chnnel · 145,432#18
@Amyraly · 40#19
@yourperfuumm · 57,677#20
@Rlighthere · 149,629#21
@Codeain · 348,667#22
@d_Rhyshkrdi · 118,243#23
@xbeus · 19,383#24
@idiewith · 183,744#25
@WryVur · 143,561#26
@initiatur · 207,598#27
@lady_eel · 99,910#28
@spiiderclown · 16#29
@tavahomte · 29,293#30
@havaliafkaram · 21,030#31
@TheShear · 530#32
@Ersalihatun · 140,197 (as read 15 August 2026)#33
@SaeidBaratpour · 91,467#34
@MBTIV · 18,095#35
@YouBgo · 129,875#36
@delbari · 405,614#37
@meowmbti · 25#38
@boyafterU · 4,812#39
@siasefidofficial · 191,640#40
@winstnchannel · 154,277#41
@razcom · 1,218,660#42
@Bahmanbekesh · 14#43
@rebccaghaderi · 281,837#44
@iRoProxy · 7,988,659#45
@iMTProto · 7,725,467#46
@RegaPlus · 1,508,709#47
@x0505xi · 11#48
@proxy_qavi · 3,263,484#49
@Duchar · 252,422#50
@mexxyoux · 11#51
@proxydaemi · 1,741,061#52
@bistodo · 402,940#53
@rapking · 313,945#54
@hamclasixii · 101#55
@classicthemes · 471,656#56
@MakeYourCharacter · 112,223#57
@ShiyareMaqzam · 81,966#58
@samepov · 51,515#59
@HipHopTweety · 270,363#60
@howtlisten · 324,467#61
@crayingroom · 319,136#62
@irproxy · 1,271,691#63
@unja_kee · 442,211#64
@proxymtproto · 11,863,193#65
@Myporoxy · 4,538,660#66
@Sickliy · 26,403#67
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 15 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@greenbook_channel · 53,439
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 23 August 2026
@lady_eel · 99,910
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 15 August 2026
@ShakhsiatShenasii · 18,901
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 1 October 2026
@MyCrrush · 19,423
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 29 September 2026
@Green_Genius · 229,047
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 11 August 2026
@Hesse_Arammesh · 79,681
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 19 August 2026
@Thrpist · 46,652
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 23 August 2026
@malakesho · 1,371
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 31 August 2026
@Dzhav · 78,316
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 18 August 2026
@Siyasatejazb · 29,544
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 6 September 2026
@kalammmeziba1234 · 32,512
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 4 September 2026
@girin · 33,451
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 4 September 2026
@shah_fal · 162,364
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 12 August 2026
@vahm_sabz · 157,276
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 12 August 2026
@Biography_khas1 · 22
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 12 August 2026
@Ravnshnas · 148,351
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 12 August 2026
@Zahne_Aram · 258,038
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 10 August 2026
@Allef · 130
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 17 August 2026
@varzesh_ba_raaghs · 76,211
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 21 August 2026
@Zhakav_Chnnel · 145,432
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 15 August 2026
@tajvizAngize · 298,672
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 10 August 2026
@styleiranii · 45,907
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 26 August 2026
@vazeiyatsefid · 140,464
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 12 August 2026
@wain_s · 73,623
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 2 September 2026
This channel appears in 81 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“روحِیّات | روانشناسی” (@Rohiyat), 96,084 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Rohiyat.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.