یکی پرسیده بود دخترا برای روتین بیکینی چیکار میکنین؟ دخترای اینجا هم کم نذاشتن و کلی روتین پیشنهاد دادن 😂 منم انجام دادم و الان نتیجه اینه که هرجا میرم یه بوی نارگیل نامرئی هم باهامه :)))) روتین کامل رو اینجا گذاشته: @Rotine

Channel
「دژاوو」
@Dzhav
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
78,919subscribers
-8,635 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001322117718 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Dzhav |
| Description | برای بهترشدن رابطتت ( لانگ دیستنس ) و خودت به این کانال نیاز داری! 🤍🌱. |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 49 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Dzhav |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 65% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Oct 2026, 09:05 | 78,919 | -57 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 10:39 | 78,976 | -89 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 09:00 | 79,065 | -86 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 08:38 | 79,151 | -136 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 07:14 | 79,287 | -148 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 02:59 | 79,435 | -96 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 00:47 | 79,531 | -26 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 23:30 | 79,557 | -78 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 21:37 | 79,635 | -55 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 18:38 | 79,690 | -104 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 17:11 | 79,794 | -58 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 16:16 | 79,852 | -90 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 05:18 | 79,942 | -238 |
| 8 Oct 2026, 21:37 | 80,180 | -718 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 07:37 | 80,898 | -825 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 16:02 | 81,723 | -624 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 07:57 | 82,347 | -262 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 08:16 | 82,609 | -262 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 14:58 | 82,871 | -314 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 20:22 | 83,185 | first reading |
Engagement
43 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 169 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 3.63%
- avg views ÷ 78,919 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2,860
- 22 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 22
- of 43 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 43 (24 July 2026 – 26 October 2026) |
| Views total | 63,028 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 26 Oct 2026, 19:35 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈3,590
- Videos
- ≈837
- Links
- ≈3,800
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 17s
- Average length
- 6s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
دوستم پیام داده میدونی چرا پاهام اینجوری میشن و این رگ ها چیه؟ دنبال راه حلش گشتیم دیدم اینجا صفرتاصدشو توضیح داده : @YadGereftamKe
میدونستید اگه دون دون های روی پاهاتون رو درمان کنید، همچین چیزی میشه؟ اینجا قشنگ توضیح دادم
5روش برای دلتنگ کردن طرف مقابل : 🌱 ✅۱- اگه مدتی ازش خبری نشد صبر کن و بهش فضا بده تا خودش دلش تنگ بشه.بهش زنگ نزن پیام نده تا عدم حضورت رو حس کنه ✅۲- فکر نکن اگه دائم بهش بچسبی و چکش بکنی بیشتر بهت جذب میشه اینطوری اونو از خودت دورتر میکنی. ✅۳- برای خودت ارزش قائل شو،انقدر خودت رو محتاج نشون نده. سر خودتو گرم کن ✅۴- وقتی می بینی برای خودت و زندگیت برنامه داری و کل زندگیت بهش خلاص نمیشه. بیشتر سمتت کشیده میشه…
اصطلاحاتی که بهتره وقتی میری کافه بدونی : 🌱 ✅۱- اسموتی: نوشیدنی غلیظ از میوههای مختلف ✅۲- کوکتل: آبمیوه و آبگازدار(سودا) ✅۳- آفوگادو : قهوه داغ روی بستنی ✅۴- دتاکس: میوهای که در آب نگهداری شده ✅۵- پانچ: آبمیوه گازدار و میوه ✅۶- شیک: بستنی و شیر و خامه ✅۷- فراپه: قهوه، شکر، آب با قالبهای یخ ✅۸- کرپ: موز، شکلات داخلِ نان نازک سرخ شده ✅۹- پنینی: ساندویچ گریل مرغ یا گوشت ✅۱۰- آلفردو: پاستا و سُس آلفرد (ا…
10 سوال چالشی و مهم در رابطه لانگ دیستنس :🌱 این سوالات انقدر تیزن که یا صمیمیت بینتون بیشتر میشه یا خیلی چیزا رو میشه 1️⃣. اگه الان کسی پیشت بود که هم حست رو میفهمید، هم میتونست بغلت کنه، منو انتخاب میکردی یا اونو؟ 2️⃣تو تنهاییهات با فکر به من آروم میشی یا بیشتر اذیت میشی؟ یا میری سراغ کسی دیگه؟ 3️⃣اگه یه شب بهت پیشنهاد صمیمی از طرف یه نفر جذاب و نزدیک برسه، قبول میکنی یا نه؟ با دلیل. 4️⃣تو رابطه از راه دور…
اینو بفرست برای پارتنرت و ازش بخوا به سوالات جواب بده :🌱 🔰- اسمم تو گوشیت چیه؟ 🔰- یه لقب بامزه بهم بده؟ 🔰- از عادت های خاص من بگو؟ 🔰- اگه ۵ دقیقه گوشیم دستت باشه کجارو چک میکنی؟ 🔰- یه چیز خوب راجب من؟ 🔰- یه چیز بد راجب من؟ 🔰- تابحال سوالی داشتی که نتونستی ازم بپرسی؟ 🔰- چند درصد دوستم داری؟ ( ۳۵-۵۵-۷۵-۱۰۰) 🔰- من برای تو چیم؟ 🔰- رازی داری که بخوای بهم بگی؟ 🔰- اولین باری که منو دیدی چجوری به نظرت اومدم؟ دژاوو
دختره عکس قدی از خودش توییت کرده و نظر بقیه رو بخونید جرررررر😂 : کامنتای ملت خداسسس 😂
دخترا موقعی که پریود میشین سینههاتون سفت میشه :))؟! جواب : @Tweet
+ جرررر 😂😂😂😂 - به چی میخندی اسکل؟😐 بزن رو ایموجی های زیر از خنده پاره میشی! 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
لعنت بهت ازاده با این ممه هات😂😂😂😂
این سوالات رو برای پارتنرت بفرست و امروز بهم جواب بدید قطعا کمک میکنه به رابطتون: ۱)وقتی ناراحتی دوست داری چه رفتاری باهات داشته باشم؟ ۲)قشنگ ترین صفت شخصیتی من چیه؟ ۳)بزرگترین ترسی که توی رابطه عاطفی داری چیه؟ ۴)سمی ترین و آسیب زا ترین صفت یا رفتار که رابطه رو سرد میکنه واست چیه؟ ۵)چیکار کنم تا با امنیت خاطر بیشتر کنارم خودِ واقعیات باشی؟ ۶)نیاز داری تو کدوم یکی از این ۵ بخش بیشتر حمایتت کنم؟ امنیت، عشق و محبت،…
Showing the 12 most recent of 43 posts we hold for @Dzhav. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@iMTProto · 7,636,279#1
@RegaPlus · 1,496,796#2
@darkproxy · 4,623,487#3
@Afkar · 1,017,244#4
@razcom · 1,220,046#5
@TweetyChannel · 818,546#6
@tajrubeha · 169,872 (as read 18 August 2026)#7
@tajvizAngize · 302,134#8
@Rohiyat · 96,623#9
@Allef · 127#10
@Radiokocsher · 1,133,683#11
@sogoandfuckyourlove · 561,926#12
@liwish · 179,048#13
@lady_eel · 100,333#14
@iciou · 282,597#15
@Comentiat · 403,648#16
@Herochnl · 421,410#17
@bedemure · 134,607#18
@kianaafr · 404,480#19
@timemoodz1 · 285,911#20
@icu_0fficial · 185,327#21
@Green_Genius · 227,642#22
@Zahne_Aram · 250,507#23
@mbtixie · 41,728#24
@TheGamepc · 197#25
@iDeathBirth · 31#26
@cactos · 264,616#27
@Kososher_man · 260,046#28
@Ersalihatun · 140,022 (as read 18 August 2026)#29
@UnNurmal · 526,721#30
@Ravnshnas · 148,749#31
@winstnchannel · 153,020#32
@ocbooks · 324,491#33
@d_Rhyshkrdi · 118,702#34
@idiewith · 180,080#35
@WryVur · 142,249#36
@delbari · 409,804#37
@vahm_sabz · 158,523#38
@Bahmanbekesh · 209,039#39
@TheShear · 500#40
@Senariochanell · 159#41
@Nrfti_Az_Yadm · 11,939#42
@ShiyareMaqzam · 82,402#43
@akharin_dorna · 33,934#44
@Kofebor · 159,503#45
@Loavma · 360,360#46
@Myelma · 112,084#47
@hawlsu · 10,587#48
@Zhakav_Chnnel · 15#49
@isoolatedw · 5,092#50
@NoteChnll · 109,494#51
@horror_of_house · 193,095#52
@whoseartprofile · 53,383#53
@buyeto · 167,115 (as read 18 August 2026)#54
@mane_inja · 84,000#55
@iRoProxy · 7,963,003#56
@Daneshjoo · 359,068#57
@MakeYourCharacter · 113,684#58
@mexxyoux · 99,436#59
@Duchar · 246,042#60
@ParsTwt · 522,049#61
@vazeiyatsefid · 141,272#62
@classicthemes · 477,828#63
@x0505xi · 115,936#64
@howtlisten · 326,086#65
@unja_kee · 427,969#66
@MonaLisach · 82,057#67
@Voguechnll · 291,299#68
@mehraddhiden · 228#69
@xanax85 · 198,149#70
@im403error · 40,645#71
@royemaaah · 17,524#72
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 18 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@lady_eel · 100,333
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 15 August 2026
@colorful_dreamsZ · 39,004
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 30 August 2026
@minii_shear · 49
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 24 August 2026
@iNteRvaAl · 19,543
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 1 October 2026
@peaceradio1 · 22,835
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 19 September 2026
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“「دژاوو」” (@Dzhav), 78,919 subscribers as measured 26 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Dzhav.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.