تنظیمات تلگرامم چقدر خوشگل شد

Channel
『بیوگرافیـ خاصــ』
@Biography_khas1
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
181,612subscribers
+3,568 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001367851218 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Biography_khas1 |
| Description | خودت باش...! ᴖ̈ انقد میریم بالا کِه کل دنیا مارو بِبینه!! @thealiazar تبلیغات |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 25 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Biography_khas1 |
Topic
Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 89% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 08:01 | 181,612 | -461 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 21:21 | 182,073 | +182,058 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 06:02 | 15 | -175,635 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 06:05 | 175,650 | -60 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 04:23 | 175,710 | -72 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 03:38 | 175,782 | -93 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 06:35 | 175,875 | -89 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 07:04 | 175,964 | +23 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 04:05 | 175,941 | -48 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 21:17 | 175,989 | -180 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 02:18 | 176,169 | -169 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 16:56 | 176,338 | -143 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 16:16 | 176,481 | -152 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 12:54 | 176,633 | -138 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 09:44 | 176,771 | -173 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 15:45 | 176,944 | -152 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 00:53 | 177,096 | -124 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 22:36 | 177,220 | -97 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 00:32 | 177,317 | -153 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 21:44 | 177,470 | first reading |
Engagement
436 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 82 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 2.86%
- avg views ÷ 181,612 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 5,190
- 183 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 183
- of 436 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 183 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 436 (5 August 2026 – 21 September 2026) |
| Views total | 950,101 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Sept 2026, 02:35 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈11,100
- Videos
- ≈173
- Links
- ≈724
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 1
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 1
- of 436 we hold a reading for · 0.2%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Biography_khas1. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 436 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 21 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
عاشق لنگوئج تلگرامم شدم
لنگوئج تلگرام
به جای انلاین اینو میزنه @Theme
راه برگشتی وجود نداره قدر یه چیزیو همون موقعه بدونید
بیو واسه تاکسیکا
بیو واسه برونگراها
وقتی آنلاینه و سین نمیکنه اینو بذار بیوت
هر کسی که بیوی های مفهومی و قشنگ میذاره بی شک ازینجا بر میداره @bio
𝘢𝘭𝘭 𝘵𝘩𝘰𝘴𝘦 𝘪 𝘭𝘰𝘷𝘦 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘫𝘶𝘴𝘵 𝘦𝘮𝘱𝘵𝘺 𝘸𝘰𝘳𝘥𝘴 این دوست دارم ها همش حرف بیخوده
Profile
𝐼 𝐶𝐻𝑂𝑂𝑆𝐸 𝑃𝐸𝐴𝐶𝐸 𝑂𝑉𝐸𝑅 𝑃𝐸𝑂𝑃𝐿𝐸 آرامش رو به آدما ترجیح میدم
Showing the 12 most recent of 436 posts we hold for @Biography_khas1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
اینترنت شما هم ضعیف شده!؟
- اره47%
- نه18%
- ضعیف ک بود ریده تر شد51%
The shares total 116%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
اومدین!؟ بپاکم!؟
- اره53%
- نه الان میام60%
The shares total 113%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
خوندین تکستاشو!؟
- اره50%
- نه الان میام بخونم60%
The shares total 110%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 436 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 21 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@music · 93,3776 postsشعر و غزل
@shear · 2,1293 posts[ BioDep | بیودپ ]
@biodep · 40,2642 postsBio📄📝
@bioooo · 1622 postsVideo - Update every day +Follow
@video_Movie_film · 2,3312 postsکانفیگ های رایگان /V2RayNG / فیلتر شکن رایگان
@ConfigV2rayNG · 13,9891 postلینک ژرف
@Zhaarf · 1,1471 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 4
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 4
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@Biography_khas1 named 4 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 2 posts, 18 August 2026 – 19 August 2026
named in 1 post, 23 August 2026 – 23 August 2026
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@ibiographi · 91,662#1
@iDeathBirth · 4#2
@sogoandfuckyourlove · 548,060#3
@Duchar · 231,503#4
@Loavma · 364,738#5
@irobah · 22,920#6
@samepov · 48,272#7
@DarkRome · 162,403#8
@biodep · 40,264#9
@dokhtarone_profail · 143,039#10
@idiewith · 175,447#11
@Rohiyat · 98,691#12
@ex_koskesh · 20,823#13
@havaliafkaram · 21,291#14
@MasteMaqmom · 26,236#15
@iciou · 272,260#16
@Heroin_Bioo · 32,203#17
@im403error · 41,803#18
@tavahomte · 31,870#19
@autisticme · 50,735#20
@delbari · 408,937#21
@iRoProxy · 7,897,583#22
@iMTProto · 7,490,676#23
@bedemure · 128,555#24
@darkproxy · 4,753,824#25
@proxy_qavi · 3,410,803#26
@liwish · 176,154#27
@siasefidofficial · 191,170#28
@classicthemes · 493#29
@Afkar · 1,028,918#30
@hamclasixii · 63#31
@rapking · 307,869#32
@RegaPlus · 1,474,377#33
@Codeain · 338,713#34
@TweetyChannel · 782,246#35
@timemoodz1 · 88#36
@irproxy · 1,280,895#37
@Ashoftegi_official · 147,777#38
@proxymtprotoir · 3,253,649#39
@lwall_3Dl · 190,033#40
@howtlisten · 332,298#41
@seshot6 · 473,522#42
@initiatur · 191,944#43
@unja_kee · 412,945#44
@nikotiinn_text · 458,101#45
@mexxyoux · 95,822#46
@ahangify · 4,227,722#47
@wallpapercolorv · 99,152#48
@Herochnl · 383,226#49
@Radiokocsher · 966,334#50
@YouBgo · 100,135#51
@RiMixeYou · 966,951#52
@yourperfuumm · 4#53
@Ye_DaneshAmoz · 944,563#54
@rebccaghaderi · 273,082#55
@Maagas · 678,884#56
@Myelma · 114,047#57
@ashkan_kagan · 117,983#58
@ParsTwt · 506,670#59
@proxymtproto · 11,940,791#60
@proxydaemi · 1,753,381#61
@Myporoxy · 4,491,818#62
@bistodo · 389,064#63
@vaarzesh_plus · 316,357#64
@Sickliy · 30,933#65
@tweet_Khabari · 639,173#66
@whatsmusic · 2,066,128#67
@Esticgif · 2,787#68
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 12 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@ibiographi · 91,662
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 17 August 2026
@Bioo_o · 34,039
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 3 September 2026
@girin · 32,810
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 4 September 2026
@Heroin_Bioo · 32,203
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 5 September 2026
@biodep · 40,264
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 30 August 2026
@profaildokhtarone · 25,069
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 14 September 2026
@Zhakav_Chnnel · 14
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 15 August 2026
@DarkRome · 162,403
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 12 August 2026
@dokhtarone_profail · 143,039
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 13 August 2026
@texstman · 62,227
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 5 September 2026
@bhtrenha88 · 51,042
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 27 August 2026
@Mo_Sitoo · 58,550
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 22 August 2026
@colorful_dreamsZ · 39,814
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 30 August 2026
@fakeax · 47,472
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 26 August 2026
@storyhaam · 63,498
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 21 August 2026
@offnot · 111,376
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 15 August 2026
@TheListenSong · 81,150
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 18 August 2026
@aks_tike · 119,948
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 15 August 2026
@TxTBiwo · 37,232
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 1 September 2026
@lady_eel · 102,849
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 15 August 2026
@Bio_TakKhati · 23,340
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 18 September 2026
@arezooedit2 · 24,874
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 15 September 2026
@Nikotniha · 265,591
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 25 August 2026
@tikesngiin · 53,144
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 6 September 2026
This channel appears in 49 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“『بیوگرافیـ خاصــ』” (@Biography_khas1), 181,612 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Biography_khas1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.