Channel
@designintrovert
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
3,249subscribers
+43 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001251976540 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @designintrovert |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/designintrovert |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Sept 2026, 04:36 | 3,249 | +8 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 05:58 | 3,241 | +1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 01:57 | 3,240 | -2 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 04:47 | 3,242 | +14 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 13:43 | 3,228 | +3 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 18:52 | 3,225 | +5 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 12:57 | 3,220 | +5 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 23:34 | 3,215 | +10 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 09:22 | 3,205 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:23 | 3,207 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:01 | 3,206 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:48 | 3,206 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
169 reactions across 7 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 82 | 48.5% | |
| 🔥 | 51 | 30.2% | |
| 🍓 | 13 | 7.69% | |
| 😁 | 12 | 7.10% | |
| 🕊 | 11 | 6.51% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 169 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Может дайждест полезных постов? Особенно будет актуально для новоприбывших. 🤩плагины для работы с текстом и здесь уже больше визуальные 🤩мои проекты-портфолио — для понимания, что я делаю и как это выглядит 🤩полезнейшие стандартные блоки Tilda 🤩эфир: как вообще мода влияет на дизайнеров и небольшое отступление для интересующихся: как найти свой стиль и не теряться в трендах. 🤩искусство для дизайна 🤩избежать гиг…
❤5🍓3🔥3
Нейросети для миллениалов в одном чате). Я долго скептически относилась ко всем этим «нейронкам». С мыслями: «я что сама не справлюсь?» 🤩 Начала я с текстов для клиентов. GPT отлично помогает. Если есть основа из тезисной базы (а хороший клиент всегда вам ее предоставит), то результат может быть очень не плохим. Главное потом сделать вычитку и обязательно подкорректировать ошибки, если они вдруг есть в смыслах. 🤩…
❤10🔥4🕊3
// Шрифты в старославянском стиле Ну не могу я никуда деться от этой красоты. Собралась новая подборка. Все файлы можно найти в комментариях. #fonts@designintrovert • • • • • • • • А если вдруг вам этого мало, то в библиотеку для дизайнеров для добавила еще более 40 шрифтов. Бесплатных для коммерции. • 4.990р • бессрочный • вечнопополняемый лк Забрать доступ можно здесь.
🔥16❤4🕊1
Сториз тоже оформляем В продолжении каруселей для бьюти ниши, потребовалось создать и услуги для каруселей. Минималистично. Аккуратно. Стильно. #work@designintrovert
❤32🍓4🕊3
Вы вообще это видели? Алло! Бизнес! *никаких нейросетей
❤12😁12🔥5🕊4
ТОП ссылок, где можно подсмотреть новые дизайн-идеи и концепции Если хочется большего в насмотренности. То имеет смысл пойти куда-то еще, кроме как в подборку Тильды и эвордсы. А еще круче — точечно отслеживать студии и бренды. • Studio Feixen — это небольшая дизайн-студия в Люцерне, Швейцария, которая занимается созданием визуальных концепций. Для них важно, чтобы дизайн бросал им вызов. • Щука — Студия создает б…
🔥18❤5🍓4
5–10 минут, чтобы понять, что портфолио надо переделать… 🖤 Простые или водянистые проекты в портфолио. При скрининге действует простое правило: «Дизайнер показывает только картинки — значит, он не понимает дизайн-процесс». Покажите исследования, данные, как вы пришли к решению сделать именно так 🖤 Антикоммерческие проекты. Это когда у вас сплошь и рядом редизайны и креатив. Учетная система для библиотекарей, обучен…
❤14🔥5🍓2
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @designintrovert. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
@designintrovert named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“дизайн интроверта” (@designintrovert), 3,249 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/designintrovert.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.