Posted without readable text
❤44🔥10😍9

Channel
@prodlx
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
48,184subscribers
+591 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001897848694 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @prodlx |
| Description | Мысли, знания и опыт веб-дизайнера, который стабильно делает на фрилансе миллионы Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/yanadlx |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 27 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/prodlx |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Sept 2026, 08:39 | 48,184 | +92 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 23:36 | 48,092 | +252 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 11:55 | 47,840 | +31 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 09:24 | 47,809 | +49 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 07:38 | 47,760 | +19 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 05:38 | 47,741 | +65 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 03:44 | 47,676 | +37 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 05:35 | 47,639 | +47 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 02:48 | 47,592 | +37 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 05:13 | 47,555 | +11 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 07:32 | 47,544 | +49 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 07:36 | 47,495 | +128 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 13:38 | 47,367 | +1 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 01:34 | 47,366 | -1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 02:01 | 47,367 | -1 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 23:33 | 47,368 | +61 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 21:04 | 47,307 | +110 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 17:34 | 47,197 | -16 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 01:54 | 47,213 | -52 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 17:17 | 47,265 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 65 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (21 July 2026 – 2 September 2026) |
| Views total | 66,620 |
| Reactions total | 429 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Sept 2026, 21:34 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
4,450 reactions across 17 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2,745 | 61.7% | |
| 🔥 | 948 | 21.3% | |
| 🥰 | 472 | 10.6% | |
| 🙏 | 78 | 1.75% | |
| 🤩 | 76 | 1.71% | |
| 😍 | 67 | 1.51% | |
| ❤🔥 | 41 | 0.921% | |
| 😎 | 11 | 0.247% | |
| 👍 | 6 | 0.135% | |
| 💯 | 6 | 0.135% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,450 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @prodlx. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Posted without readable text
❤44🔥10😍9
МНЕ ПОНАДОБИЛОСЬ 3 ГОДА чтобы понять то, что я завтра начну отдавать вам в SYSTEM 🤩 И я сейчас смотрю на свои первые видео и мне одновременно очень смешно и очень хочется себя тогда обнять)) Я не умела ставить свет, нормально снимать и монтировать. Не понимала, как работают Reels, что показывать в Stories, как упаковывать профиль, откуда брать подписчиков и как вообще сделать так, чтобы блог начал приносить деньги …
❤23👍6🔥6
3 ДНЯ ДО СТАРТА SYSTEM, ГОСПОДИ, Я ТАК ДОЛГО К ЭТОМУ ШЛА 🤍 Последние месяцы я буквально жила этим обучением: записывала уроки, переделывала их, тестировала программу, смотрела, что работает у ребят, докручивала задания И сейчас до первого потока осталось 3 дня)) И знаете, о чём я думаю? Сколько крутых специалистов сейчас из этого получится 😍 Сколько блогов через несколько месяцев я буду открывать и думать: «бляяя, …
❤20🤩8😍8
А ЕСЛИ ЗАВТРА У ВАС НЕ БУДЕТ РАБОТЫ? 👀 неважно, вы в найме или работаете на себя Компания сокращает должность. Главный клиент уходит. Проект заканчивается. И вот здесь вопрос — сколько людей уже знают, что вы классный специалист? Не от бывших коллег, которым можно срочно написать: «ребят, у вас там никого не ищут?», а от людей, которые сами вспомнят про вас, когда им понадобится человек с вашей экспертизой Я посто…
❤18🔥9💯6
ПОКА ВЫ НЕ ПРОШЛИ МОНТАЖ, МНЕ ПРИХОДИТСЯ ПРЕПОДАВАТЬ ЛИЧНО 😂 Хожу, показываю, куда нажимать, что куда накладывать... Кого-нибудь узнали на видео? 👀 А вообще недавно я сделала то, чего раньше не делала — впервые открыла в закрытом клубе настоящий урок из SYSTEM Причём именно по монтажу, про который вы спрашиваете у меня постоянно)) Я отдала один из приёмов, который сама использую буквально в каждом втором Reels — к…
❤21❤🔥10🔥9
4991 → 83 400 ПРОСМОТРОВ и это нулевой поток 🤩 Я сейчас обучаю кураторов для SYSTEM, и параллельно они сами проходят всю систему на практике То есть это буквально нулевой поток: мы тестируем, докручиваем, смотрим, где нужно объяснить подробнее, где добавить задание, где человек может застрять И вот один из результатов ↓ Прикрепляю два видео одной ученицы До — 4991 просмотров После — 83 400 И мне здесь даже не са…
❤25😍3🤩2
Posted without readable text
🔥68🤩22😎11
КУДА УХОДЯТ ВАШИ КЛИЕНТЫ? И ПОЧЕМУ? 🤩 В маркетинге есть понятие Category Entry Points — точки входа в категорию. Звучит душно, но сама мысль мне очень нравится)) Допустим, есть два дизайнера Первый постоянно показывает красивые проекты, рассказывает про дизайн, выкладывает жизнь. На него приятно смотреть, его даже запоминают А второй регулярно появляется в контексте конкретных ситуаций: → «запускаете продукт — вот…
❤🔥20🔥12😍6
КТО НЕ ПОПАЛ НА «СИСТЕМУ БЛОГА»? В воскресенье мы провели большой бесплатный вебинар про блог. И судя по тому, сколько потом прилетело сообщений «ЯНААА, А ЗАПИСЬ БУДЕТ?» — надо было сразу понимать, чем всё закончится 😂 Запись будет 🤍 Если вы пропустили эфир, можно посмотреть его сейчас Там я показываю: — почему блог может не расти, даже когда вы реально много делаете — чем отличаются Reels на охваты, подписку и пр…
🔥7🤩6❤🔥5
😄 До вебинара остался всего 1 день Уже завтра в 15:00 встречаемся на бесплатном вебинаре «СИСТЕМА БЛОГА» Мне очень хочется, чтобы после этого эфира вы наконец перестали искать проблему там, где её нет, потому что многие думают, что блог не растёт: — из-за Reels — из-за монтажа — из-за оформления — из-за алгоритмов а потом проходит полгода... и ничего не меняется)) На вебинаре покажу, почему блог может стоять на мес…
❤22🔥7❤🔥6
Posted without readable text
❤26🔥11🤩8
😍 Кажется, Instagram решил обновить вообще всё Пока все обсуждают охваты, платформа тихо выкатывает одну функцию за другой. Часть уже появилась у многих, а другая часть только раскатывается И если честно... некоторые обновления реально классные)) Сделала для вас одну большую подборку. Листайте карусель 🤍 И да... обратите внимание на слайд про чужой контент И маленький совет Не пытайтесь запомнить всё, что есть в …
❤33🔥11😍8
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @prodlx. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@prodlx edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 5 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Яна ProDesign” (@prodlx), 48,184 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/prodlx.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.